Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for In лангуаге we trust

Channel

In лангуаге we trust

@inlanguages

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,176subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002230280724
TypeChannel
Username@inlanguages
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inlanguages

Growth

7,1767,2067,1917 August 2026 — 7,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,196 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,185 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,176 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,172–7,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:137,176-9
14 Aug 2026, 15:567,185-11
11 Aug 2026, 04:017,196-8
8 Aug 2026, 11:187,204-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:167,206no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:097,206first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 7,176 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (20 October 20255 August 2026)
Views total3,940
Reactions total384
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,020 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
98032.5%
🔥95331.6%
🎃2307.62%
👀2086.89%
1815.99%
😁943.11%
❤‍🔥822.72%
🤯632.09%
🤓501.66%
🌚441.46%
💔431.42%
💘311.03%
🫡270.894%
🦄100.331%
60.199%
😱50.166%
😍40.132%
🙏40.132%
🤣30.099%
😢10.033%
1 further kind10.033%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,020reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inlanguages. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,420 views189 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Набрасываю слова на вентилятор, или история про то, как я хотела вам рассказать про одно слово, но получилось *чуточку* больше 🧙‍♂️ Недавно на занятии заговорили про cast-гипс (который для сломанных костей), и ученик меня спросил: "Падажжи, а есть же ещё cast-состав актёров, кастинги и всё такое, они связаны?" Рассказываю! В Old Norse (древнескандинавском) был такой глагол kasta. Значил "бросать/метать". И, доплыв

🔥1234122🦄3

20 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC≈2,520 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чёлочные приколы 🤩 Когда мы на занятиях со студентами обсуждаем описание внешности, там всегда вылезает чёлка. А за чёлкой вылезают вопросы. Во-первых, есть два стула слова: a fringe - британский вариант для "чёлки" bangs - американский вариант. Он ещё и во множественном числе (да, мы говорим "my bangs are too long"). И многих (включая меня) с этого множественного числа немного корёжит. 🍎 С fringe всё миленько и

👀116💔43🔥257😁4

22 Jun 2026, 10:13 UTC≈3,910 views189 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Принесла вам развлекаловку под названием There's no way Tolkien was speaking English here (=без шансов, что Толкин разговаривал тут на английском) 🎧 Чисто потестить свои listening skills в эльфийском английском. А вот, собственно, что он говорит: Let me say at once that owing to the casualties in the war and various other things, there were very few people to elect. It's a pity you couldn't be here in the springt

👀90🤓46🔥23🫡23😁7

13 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC≈4,210 views203 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Какая-то поножовщина 🔪 Я обожаю на занятиях обсуждать тему бытовых предметов. Вот эти все инструменты, мебель, кухонные принадлежности - подайте сюда, пожалуйста. Там всегда можно порыться и найти что-то новое или выяснить, что для одной и той же штуки есть миллион региональных вариантов. 😈И вот мы недавно заговорили за перочинные ножи, которые на англ можно назвать penknife (это чаще в British English) или pocket

🔥1373527😱4

19 May 2026, 11:23 UTC≈4,700 views171 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рукоделие и капелька французского 🧶 Мне тут ученица недавно рассказывала про свои многообразные hand-made проекты, и в частности ей нужно было слово "мулине". Собственно, на англ это mouline. Хотя зачастую люди с этим словом не очень знакомы и порой надёжнее использовать что-то вроде embroidery thread/embroidery floss (=нити для вышивки) И вот мы говорим про эти мулине. Причём иногда его произносят как moo-li-nay,

105❤‍🔥33🔥236🤓4

29 Apr 2026, 12:17 UTC≈5,160 views139 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про баскет с крылышками и обман (отрыла даже под такое дело свою фоточку с полковником Сандерсом) 🍗 🌟Мы тут на занятии разбирали всякие бытовые предметы, в частности там мелькали basket (корзина) и bucket (ведро). И мне ученик говорит что-то вроде: "Но если так подумать, то в кфс должен быть бакет, а не баскет..." 🍗 И, господа, открылась удивительная вещь: в англоязычном kfc нет никаких baskets-корзиночек. Там име

81🔥32😁17🤯8💘1

8 Apr 2026, 13:13 UTC≈6,700 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Душнопост 🤓 Меня периодически ученики спрашивают: "Катя, а как сказать, что я душнила?". Поэтому я решила подсобрать словарную душно-коллекцию в одном месте. Считаю, что идеального аналога в англ нет, но есть много штук, которые норм могут подойти. Итак, погнали: 1️⃣a killjoy / a buzzkill / a party pooper - это прям база, которую вам выдадут словари на "душнилу". Буквально "тот, кто портит всё веселье". По факту

🔥12547🤯1815🤣3

24 Mar 2026, 12:45 UTC≈6,220 views185 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Микроприкол с quite 🐈 Когда говорят про разницу между British и American English, то вспоминают всякие lift/elevator, flat/apartment, biscuits/cookies и т.п. А я вам ещё закину мааленькую разницу в восприятии quite. Если очень грубо, то расклад такой: - в AmE quite = очень/реально/крайне - в BrE quite = довольно-таки/в некоторой степени - но в целом слово quite чуть более характерно для BrE, а американцы скорее буд

🔥9359226🤯5

14 Feb 2026, 15:50 UTC≈7,310 views226 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пара слов Полотно про любовь ❤️ 1️⃣Мне очень важно делить любовь и влюбленность. Мол, влюблённость - это неконтролируемые гормоны, эйфорический подъём и passion во всех проявлениях, а любовь вся такая спокойная и стабильная. Вплоть до того, что мне норм сказать: "Слушай, я больше не влюблена в тебя, но я люблю тебя. И это хорошо." Если что, в англ тоже есть похожее деление: ❤️"I love you" - это стандартное "я любл

149❤‍🔥44💘28😍4😢1

22 Jan 2026, 12:30 UTC≈7,890 views174 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Неприятие написания и лепреконы 🍀 Начну с признания: я люблю английские слова, которые вызывают реакцию "да какого хрена это так пишется??". С ними всегда много разных эмоций. 🍀 Например, когда мои ученики в первый раз сталкиваются с тем же sewing (=шитьё, а в середине там звучит, мать его, O. Да, оно риал по звуку как sowing), я понимаю, что сейчас будут поднятые брови, тяжелые вздохи принятия и может даже *мем с

108🔥30😁30❤‍🔥5😱1

11 Jan 2026, 12:44 UTC≈8,230 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лимонные свиньи 🍋 В последние пару недель мне на реддите начали попадаться lemon pigs. 🐖 Если вы про них ничего раньше не слышали, то вы не одиноки. Это такая "новогодняя традиция" - поставить лимон на ножки-зубочистки, сделать ему глазки из гвоздики (или из чего придётся), вырезать ушки и рот, и положить в него монетку. А ещё можно сделать хвостик из фольги. Мол, получается такой good luck charm (талисман) на целы

104😁32🔥15🤯5

11 Dec 2025, 11:41 UTC≈9,300 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мода из канавы 🥶 Мы тут мельком на занятии обсуждали всякие ямы, кюветы, траншеи и т.п (да, иногда и такое к слову придётся). В какой-то момент указываю на то, что траншея будет trench. И тут меня немного подкашивает. А в голове крутится: "Подождите, trench и trench coat - это про одно и то же??? Аааааа!!! 😳" И да, тренч - это траншейное пальто. Именно так. Потому что их активно носили во время World War I. За зва

🔥1073724🤯8🫡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @inlanguages. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,316,222 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“In лангуаге we trust” (@inlanguages), 7,176 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inlanguages.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.