Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

inkzy

@inkzyio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

355subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001860677797
TypeChannel
Username@inkzyio
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/inkzyio

Growth

354355354.57 Aug 2026, 23:34 — 354 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 354 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:55 — 355 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:348 Aug 2026, 09:55
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:55355+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:46354no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:34354first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.2%
avg views ÷ 355 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,487
Reactions total238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9640.3%
custom 52198780750130233574820.2%
custom 51973459120740195414518.9%
custom 52491067276216575323313.9%
custom 5409091635172620091104.20%
custom 520407654673365412162.52%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inkzyio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC95 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Do you feel better or worse after spending time with the person you spend most of your time with?

custom 519734591207401954164

7 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC166 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Have an enemy.

custom 521987807501302335710custom 54090916351726200914custom 519734591207401954132

7 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Put the customer over the company. Tell the customer what you would want to know if you were in their shoes. Edit by cutting everything out until cutting any more would cut something the customer would actually like to know.

4custom 52198780750130233573

7 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC168 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If your marketing would work for any company, it's no good.

custom 524910672762165753241

7 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC173 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Being first to market gets you so much free marketing. And it's better to be first in the mind than to be first in the marketplace.

3

7 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC147 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Ferrari will always deliver one car less than the market demand.”

custom 521987807501302335773custom 52491067276216575322

7 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC155 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Worst marketing strategy is to be all things to all people.

3

7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC183 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

To tell a good story, you must reveal a surprise; otherwise it is just a report.

8

7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC189 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Need to belong is so powerful that people will join a group even when painful or humiliating. The pain is then retroactively reinterpreted as proof of the group's value.

12

7 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC209 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

To know you won’t make it, just check if you’re participating in an entrepreneurial program.

12

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC220 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Most arguments are not really about the argument, so most arguments can’t be won by arguing.

custom 51973459120740195418custom 52198780750130233571

5 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC238 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

What is important is seldom urgent and what is urgent is seldom important. To get the important stuff done, avoid the demands of the urgent. You can start by unfollowing all channels, muting all notifications, and building a life where fewer things get to interrupt you.

custom 521987807501302335712custom 524910672762165753275

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inkzyio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 660,168 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“inkzy” (@inkzyio), 355 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inkzyio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.