10 Jan 2021, 10:22 UTC695 viewsread 12 August 2026
但是我们确实是真飞机啊
Channel
中华入口
@ingresschina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001258316312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ingresschina |
| Description | 为各位代理人提供入口游戏的各种中文资讯，本频道与浸世界(中国)科技有限公司及其董事会成员、管理层、执行层、吃瓜层等均无任何关联。任何强制联想两者之间关联的行为均属个人行为，不管远近都不诛。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 29 December 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ingresschina |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 8 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
10 Jan 2021, 10:22 UTC543 viewsread 12 August 2026
相比阵营 利益更直接
10 Jan 2021, 10:22 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 August 2026
操你妈逼 对不起 我不会喷你
10 Jan 2021, 10:22 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 August 2026
我不会喷也懒得喷蓝军开小号作弊也好 还是绿军作弊也罢 这种人 没有阵营会接纳他
10 Jan 2021, 10:22 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 12 August 2026
我， @SemiBan，并不怕人打我成就。 游戏而已，公平竞争，跑来跑去也不容易。 但是作弊，对不起，操你妈逼。
10 Jan 2021, 10:16 UTC948 viewsread 12 August 2026
玩小畜生是可以开飞机的呀
10 Jan 2021, 10:16 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 12 August 2026
有人说过我们是飞机吗？（还真有
10 Jan 2021, 10:16 UTC592 viewsread 12 August 2026
但是我们确实是真飞机啊
10 Jan 2021, 10:16 UTC741 viewsread 12 August 2026
相比阵营 利益更直接
10 Jan 2021, 10:16 UTC882 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ENLoot
现在大家终于能看清当初背景图里多次转发引用的这位，给后来不知何故（我猜是跨国跨洲共享帐号灌道具导致的，但我不断言）封号了的”欧罗巴正义蓝军“ @Allonautilus 对线出谋划策的猪头军师 @dasKupfer 的真面目了： 正常玩家不开小号 流氓玩家开小号偷偷开 他作为IFS leader，居然公然鼓励教育别的玩家在开小号 @CSAEgress 整个社群的多位管理员，在系统性的共享多帐号玩 此外，在当时事件的后续更新中我已经多次强调的很清楚了 https://t.me/ENLoot/410 在我反复声明我质疑的是可能存在共享帐号行为的情况下，摆明了有人造谣说我喷事主喷的是在开飞机，甚至还造谣说我喷事主专打人成就坡，竖好几个不存在的胡扯靶子来批判我，而这个人就是 @Arekusanda ，这一上海核心绿军玩家直到今天还在呕萝卜社群里复读这个谣言来激化矛盾 现在看来这就是这群恶俗小伙一贯的手法：通过扣一顶不存在的显然荒谬…
10 Jan 2021, 10:15 UTC637 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ENLootPhoto
今天在上海IFS群受两位单场活动负责人（POC）强制邀请（参考路上遇到训练师强制进入战斗），从 https://t.me/c/1235935954/6661 开始被迫讨论了两个话题。第一个话题源于某POC的与其职责相悖的不妥发言，而他已被广大群友轮番上阵摩拳擦掌抵制和教育了，虽然不确定阿睿哭杉达最后是否真的理解和妥协了，但并不是啥有趣话题且不应鼓励这类讨论因此略过不表。 第二个话题则是同场另一POC找准机会气愤之极的发出呐喊说我在https://t.me/ENLoot/284 里提出的 AneurinenTardis 这一账号行为异常如同小号（注意，我始终是说小号，从没说过飞机，那纯属这位POC杜撰之结论）之观点是百分百造谣，宣称我说的都是“正常人看不懂的话”、“求求我做个人吧”，然后又是“恶心”又是“脑回路XXX”的把我批判了一通。 虽然我寻思着比如尽想着装逼的章鱼今天又跑来COMM辱骂的这种行为和他背后的拥趸才叫真的恶心…
9 Jan 2021, 10:44 UTC443 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
https://www.instagram.com/p/CJy2mPjA7ie/
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ingresschina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中华入口” (@ingresschina), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ingresschina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.