Video, posted without a caption
👍3❤1

Channel
@ingress_no_peek
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001208760511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ingress_no_peek |
| Description | Пародия на непородистость |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ingress_no_peek |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 17 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 12 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2024 to 4 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🎄2💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔1
13 марта группа «ВИС» проинформировала о завершении строительства клинической поликлиники №27 на улице Ереванской в Заельцовском районе города. Инспекция Госстройнадзора НСО выдала частному партнеру положительное заключение о соответствии объекта требованиям проектной документации. Приемку надзорного ведомства ГЧП-поликлиника на Ереванской прошла не с первого раза. В ноябре прошлого года застройщику отказали в выдач…
🐳1🤔1
🐶Покорили на собаках Новосибирцы забрались на самую высокую вершину региона на собачьей упряжке. Уже опытные сибиряки покорили гору Пихтовый гребень, которая находится в Маслянинском районе. Её высота – 494 метра над уровнем моря. Своим восхождением они побили свой же рекорд шестилетней давности. В этот раз они смогли доехать до Пихтового гребня с меньшим количеством собак: «Ровно шесть лет назад наша упряжка из 1…
🔥2🫡1
Вся элита Новосибирска прошла через «Мэдисон»... Неожиданно история про первый ночной клуб города получила продолжение. Телеграм-редактор Арина пообщалась с человеком, который знает все о легендарном заведении. Константин Кошкин работал в «Мэдисоне» с 1995 по 2000 год — сначала диджеем, потом директором. 🟦Как было внутри? По его словам, клуб производил впечатление. Тогда нонсенсом было ковровое покрытие, а огромна…
🤮2
Photo, posted without a caption
Уникальные кресты нашли на территории Умревинского острога под Новосибирском В музее «Россия – Моя история» разработали виртуальный макет Умревинского острога. Это одно из старейших оборонительных сооружений, построенных русскими на территории Новосибирской области. На месте раскопок нашли православные кресты, очень напоминающие католические. Подробнее... #НАУКА
Водонапорки не достопримечательности, говорили они
📍 Государство взяло под охрану водонапорную башню в Мошково На улице Железнодорожной в Мошково располагается интересное здание: деревянная водонапорная башня 1903 года постройки. Раньше это было производственное сооружение, часть железнодорожного комплекса, а теперь башню включили в перечень выявленных объектов культурного наследия Новосибирской области. Фото: Алексей Соболев ✋ @otsnews 📲Прислать новость
Депутат Милонов назвал тех, кто играет в Genshin Impact, лузерами В популярную по всему миру игру Genshin Impact играют только лузеры. Об этом в эфире «Говорит Москва» заявил зампред комитета Госдумы по защите семьи, вопросам отцовства, материнства и детства Виталий Милонов. Корейские дорамы, японское аниме и китайские видеоигры оказывают негативное влияние на молодежь, заявил Виталий Милонов. По его словам, необхо…
🍌1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ingress_no_peek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ingress_no_peek named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Селёдка с молоком” (@ingress_no_peek), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ingress_no_peek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.