Which sentence is a REQUEST?
- May I leave early?7%
- Can I use your laptop?22%
- Could you help me with this?64%
- Is it okay if I sit here?7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍5👌2🔥2🎉1

Channel
@ingliztili_britishcouncil
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,539subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001493163983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ingliztili_britishcouncil |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ingliztili_britishcouncil |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 7,539 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 7,542 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 7,547 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 7,550 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 7,550 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
267 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 85 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 31.5% | |
| 👌 | 24 | 8.99% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 8.99% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 7.12% | |
| 🤓 | 16 | 5.99% | |
| 😎 | 15 | 5.62% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Which sentence is a REQUEST?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍5👌2🔥2🎉1
📚 REQUEST vs PERMISSION 🔹 REQUEST = asking someone to do something. 👉 Could you help me? 👉 Can you open the window? 👉 Would you please call me? 🔹 PERMISSION = asking if you are allowed to do something. 👉 May I come in? 👉 Can I use your phone? 👉 Could I leave early? 💡 Remember: REQUEST → “Will you do it?” PERMISSION → “Can I do it?” ✨ Learn the difference and use English confidently! @ingliztili_britishcuncil
👍3🔥3👌2🤓1😎1
✅ Correct answer: B Explanation: This is the Third Conditional (past unreal situation): If + Past Perfect → would have + V3 Example: If I had studied harder, I would have passed the exam. 💡 Want more grammar quizzes like this? Stay tuned and keep following our page for more English questions, explanations, and daily practice! 🚀📚 #Grammar #LearnEnglish #C1 #Conditionals https://t.me/ingliztili_britishcouncil
👍4🔥3🎉1🤓1
Let's test yourself🍀 Choose the correct sentence: 👇 A) If I would have known about the meeting, I would have attended it. B) If I had known about the meeting, I would have attended it. C) If I knew about the meeting, I would have attended it. D) If I have known about the meeting, I would attend it. 💬 Comment below if you know the answer. #LearnEnglish #Grammar #C1 #Test https://t.me/ingliztili_britishcouncil
👍1👏1🔥1🤓1
The farmers in the walley eat most of .... they produce, and ... they don't eat, they sell.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2🎉1👏1🔥1🤓1😎1
🧠 Can You Make the Difference Clear? These two sentences look very similar, but they don't mean the same thing. 🔹 I have read this book. 🔹 I have been reading this book. Now it's your turn! ✍️ Write two similar sentences using: Present Perfect Present Perfect Continuous Make them look almost the same, but give them completely different meanings. 💬 Post your pair in the comments, and we'll tell you if you've used the …
🎉1👍1👏1🔥1
Now, test yourself! 🧠👇 1️⃣ I __ English for five years. A) have learned B) have been learning 2️⃣ She __ her project already. A) has finished B) has been finishing 3️⃣ They __ football for two hours. A) have played B) have been playing 4️⃣ I __ this movie three times. A) have watched B) have been watching 💬 Write your answers in the comments! 🚀 Don’t just memorize grammar rules — understand the difference! #questions…
🎉2👌1👍1👏1🔥1
📚 Present Perfect vs Present Perfect Continuous — What’s the Difference? 🤔 Many English learners confuse these two tenses. Let’s check your understanding! 👇 ✅ Present Perfect (have/has + V3) We use it when we focus on: ✔️ a completed action ✔️ the result of an action ✔️ life experiences Examples: I have finished my homework. ✅ (The result is important) She has visited Germany three times. ✅ (Experience) ✅ Presen…
🎉1👌1👍1👏1🔥1
🍎 One Apple Changed the World Imagine if that apple had never fallen... 🤯 A simple moment made Isaac Newton ask a simple question: “Why did the apple fall down instead of up?” That curiosity led to one of the most important discoveries in science — gravity. 📚 Lesson: Great achievements often begin with a small question. Stay curious. Ask why. Never stop learning. #LifeLesson #ShortStory #Motivation #ThinkTwice #Engl…
👍3👏3👌1🔥1🤓1😎1
📌 TAG QUESTIONS: The Small Questions That Make Your English Sound Natural 🇬🇧 Have you ever heard sentences like: ✅ You are a student, aren’t you? ✅ She doesn’t like coffee, does she? ✅ They went home, didn’t they? These little questions at the end are called Tag Questions. 🔹 What are Tag Questions? A tag question is a short question added at the end of a sentence. We use them when we want to: ✔️ check information ✔️ …
👍6🎉1🔥1🤓1😎1
"Do you know what this theme represents? Let me know in the comments 👇"
👍5👌1🔥1
They didn't finish the work,_____?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2🎉1👏1🤓1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ingliztili_britishcouncil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which sentence is a REQUEST?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The farmers in the walley eat most of .... they produce, and ... they don't eat, they sell.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
They didn't finish the work,_____?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I'm staying in a hotel on the shore of the Lake Windermere. My holiday ... better and better as the days go by.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I'd like to buy this coffe, it ... delicious.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Unless Ray ... here soon, I'm going to leave because I'm getting bored.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2024 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IELTS British Council English Language” (@ingliztili_britishcouncil), 7,539 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ingliztili_britishcouncil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.