Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TEST collection

Channel

TEST collection

@ingliz_tiliTests

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,279subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001481666344
TypeChannel
Username@ingliz_tiliTests
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ingliz_tiliTests

Growth

1,2791,2871,2835 September 2026 — 1,287 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,283 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,281 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,279 subscribers5 September 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,278–1,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 12:411,279-2
12 Sept 2026, 03:571,281-2
8 Sept 2026, 02:161,283-4
5 Sept 2026, 21:221,287first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3531.8%
custom 54225308627197158422623.6%
🔥2018.2%
🥰1210.9%
👍76.36%
👏43.64%
❤‍🔥21.82%
🤗21.82%
10.909%
😇10.909%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

In just under an hour, our team, Uzbekistan will face an important match. Let's get behind ✨💫🏆

5

21 Jun 2026, 09:11 UTC229 views7 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Describe something that made you uncomfortable when you were a child When I think back to my childhood, one thing that really made me uncomfortable was lizards. I've been quite squeamish about them for as long as I can remember. There was just something about the way they looked and moved that made me feel uneasy. I remember my mum telling me a story from Islamic tradition about Prophet Ibrahim. According to the st

3🔥2👍1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:56 UTC223 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Introduction When discussing the topic of telecommuting, people often hold differing views. While some argue that working from home promotes a healthier work-life balance, others believe that it can undermine teamwork and communication. While both perspectives have merit, I contend that working from home can be highly advantageous, as long as employers demonstrate sufficient self-discipline and motivation.

🔥3🥰1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:52 UTC214 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Some argue that remote work improves work-life balance, while others believe it reduces teamwork and communication. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

3🥰1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:21 UTC206 views7 reactionsread 5 September 2026

I’m truly happy for my students. Allah sees every effort, every kindness, and every intention — and His reward is always the greatest.✨💫

3🔥2custom 54225308627197158422

19 Jun 2026, 04:18 UTC162 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Ayniqsa speakingda kop ishlatgandim sozlarni

3🥰1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:18 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Assalomu alaykum ustoz bergan bilimlaringizga rozi boling speakingdayam writingdayam siz orgatgan complicated vocablardan foydalandim rahmatt

🔥3custom 542253086271971584221

19 Jun 2026, 04:15 UTC156 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3👍1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:14 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum ustoz sertifikatimni javobi B2 chiqdi

👏4👍1custom 54225308627197158421

19 Jun 2026, 04:13 UTC117 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3👍1🥰1

19 Jun 2026, 04:13 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3🥰1custom 54225308627197158421

16 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC110 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @diyorbeksieltslc

TASK 1 LESSONS FROM A 5X NINER 📊 ‣ making it ‣ there is notable varation ‣ slightly more than, just ahead of, where ‣ clear front runner, close behind ‣ inverted sentences, participle clauses ‣ why you shouldn't use dominant ‣ hit an all-time high ‣ Band 9 map words ‣ the most important sentence structure for T1 ‣ Not intuitive grammar but advanced ‣ More inverted sentences ‣ participle clause with two commas ‣ perc

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ingliz_tiliTests. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hakkı Hoca
@hakkihoca · 37,625
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
English worksheets
@english_worksheets_more · 32,710
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TEST collection” (@ingliz_tiliTests), 1,279 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ingliz_tiliTests.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.