🇺🇸 U.S. July jobs data missed expectations, with nonfarm payrolls falling by 23,000, while wage growth also came in below forecasts. The unemployment rate, however, improved to 4.1% from the expected 4.2%.

Channel
Info Talk With Asif
@infotalkwithasif
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,311subscribers
-160 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001796605536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infotalkwithasif |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infotalkwithasif |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 5,311 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 5,327 | -14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 5,341 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:54 | 5,368 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 5,386 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 5,400 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 5,410 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 5,423 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 5,430 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 5,444 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 5,464 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 5,470 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 5,471 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 65.4% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 13.5% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 4.81% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 BITCOIN'S NEXT BIG MOVE STARTS NOW! 😱 CPI, PPI & FOMC Could Change Everything https://youtu.be/VQiWCR07Gg4
❤3
🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Fed Chair Kevin Warsh is prepared to raise interest rates in September if inflation is higher than expected.
❤4
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Federal Reserve is no longer projected to raise interest rates next month.
❤12
🇺🇸 $1 trillion added to the US stock market YESTERDAY . S&P 500 closes at 7,600.
❤8
🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senate Majority Leader Thune says he still expects to hold a vote for the crypto Clarity Act this week before recess.
❤5
🚨 Bitcoin Big Update! BTC Next Move? | Altcoins & Crypto News https://youtu.be/CUFCgcxgHns
❤4
🚨 BITCOIN UPDATE | Bigger Crash or MASSIVE Bull Run Next? (Altcoins Update) https://youtu.be/8w_rXEMvqeI
❤6
🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Treasury Secretary Bessent says Senate Democrats are blocking the Crypto Clarity Act
👍1
$1,000 Voucher Giveaway 🔥 🌏 Both new and old users are welcome 🚀 Event highlights: 🔗 Register Now: https://bingx.pro/activity/netDeposit/0319366992?ch=bingx_partner&ref=W1D7NL 🏮Complete event registration to receive a mystery gift. 🏮 Deposit & Earn: • Deposit $50 →$50 Voucher • Deposit $500 →$100 Voucher • Deposit $1,000 →$200 Voucher • Deposit $5,000 →$500 Vocuher • Deposit $10,000 →$1000 Voucher ⏰ Till 31st J
🎉1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Over $1 trillion wiped out from the US stock market today.
🔥6
🇺🇸Fed Leaves Interest Rates Unchanged Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Is Delivering Remarks After the FOMC Rate Decision.
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @infotalkwithasif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@waqarzaka_channel · 116,513
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@p4provider · 27,470
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
@waqarzaka · 212,079
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Info Talk With Asif” (@infotalkwithasif), 5,311 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infotalkwithasif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.