“العلم ليس سوى إعادة ترتيب لتفكيرك اليومي”.
• اسئلة وإختبارات •
• خـلـفيـات 4K •
• اقتـبـاسـات ونصوص أدبية •
•مــعلـومـات و غـرائـب •
- قناة امبراطورية المعلومات العراقية 🇮🇶.
- بعض الكتابات الأدبية @I2_zr
- للاعلانات لدينا @Informationiqbot
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,543–17,576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:07
17,569
+22
13 Aug 2026, 12:47
17,547
-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
17,548
-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:33
17,550
-6
10 Aug 2026, 17:38
17,556
-8
9 Aug 2026, 20:12
17,564
-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:40
17,569
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:13
17,571
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:45
17,572
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:39
17,572
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.58%
avg views ÷ 17,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
805
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
57 (31 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
45,095
Reactions total
728
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,770
Videos
≈571
Links
≈2,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
728 reactions across 56 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
667
91.6%
🕊
20
2.75%
🔥
16
2.20%
🍓
7
0.962%
💘
6
0.824%
😁
5
0.687%
🆒
4
0.549%
👾
3
0.412%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 728reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الطبيب الذي عالج طفلة بالكهرباء
في عام 1762 كانت طفلة تُدعى كاثرين فيلد تعيش في مستشفى بلندن وكانت تعاني من تشنجات وتيبس شديد في عضلات جسدها حتى أصبحت غير قادرة على الحركة .
وبعد أن فشلت العلاجات قرر الطبيب ويليام واتسون تجربة شيء غريب بالنسبة لذلك الوقت وهو استخدام الكهرباء على جسدها ومنذ عام 1762 بدأ واتسون بتعريض كاثرين للكهرباء كل يوم لمدة تقارب عشرين دقيقة في كل مرة.
وبعد أسبوعين توقفت التشنجات وبدأت عضلاتها …
اختلاف ألوان الدم بين الكائنات
لا تمتلك جميع الكائنات الحية دم أحمر، ويعود اختلاف لون الدم إلى نوع الجزيء المسؤول عن نقل الأكسجين في الجسم.
فالإنسان ومعظم الفقاريات تمتلك دم أحمر لاحتوائه على الهيموغلوبين الغني بالحديد، بينما تمتلك بعض الكائنات، مثل الأخطبوط وسرطان حدوة الحصان، دم أزرق لاحتوائه على الهيموسيانين الذي يعتمد على النحاس. كما تمتلك بعض الديدان البحرية دم أخضر أو بنفسجي بسبب وجود مركبات مختلفة لنقل الأكس…
رجل فشلوا في إعدامه ثلاث مرات
في عام 1885 حُكم على البريطاني جون لي بالإعدام شنقًا بعد إدانته بقتل امرأة تُدعى إيما في قرية بإنجلترا رغم إصراره على براءته.
وفي يوم تنفيذ الحكم اقتيد لي إلى منصة المشنقة ووُضع الحبل حول عنقه، لكن عندما حاول المسؤولون إسقاط أرضية المنصة فشلت الآلية ولم تسقط.
حاولوا إصلاح المشنقة وإعادة تنفيذ الحكم لكنها فشلت للمرة الثانية ثم أُجريت محاولة ثالثة بعد التأكد من جاهزية الآلية لكنها فشلت …
كيف تستطيع بعض الطيور الطيران أثناء النوم؟
تستطيع بعض الطيور، مثل السمامة الشائعة، النوم أثناء الطيران لفترات قصيرة بفضل قدرة مدهشة تعرف بـالنوم أحادي نصف الدماغ.
ففي هذه الحالة ينام نصف الدماغ فقط، بينما يبقى النصف الآخر مستيقظ ليتحكم بالطيران ويراقب البيئة المحيطة. وبعد فترة يتبادل النصفان الأدوار، مما يسمح للطائر بمواصلة التحليق لمسافات طويلة دون الحاجة إلى الهبوط باستمرار.
https://t.me/informationss_iq
تعلن قناة إمبراطورية الأنمي عن حاجتها إلى أدمنية للمساعدة في نشر وإدارة المحتوى الخاص بالأنمي.
للراغبين بالانضمام إلى فريق الإدارة، للتواصل > @mt_4l
@anime_iq5 ⇔ @anime_iq3
ختامًا، نتقدّم بجزيل الشكر لكل من شارك في فعالية العراق الحديث، ولكل من ساهم بحضوره وتفاعله، وجعل هذه الفعالية أكثر تميزًا ومتعة.
كما يسعدنا دائمًا الاستماع إلى آرائكم واقتراحاتكم، فلا تترددوا في مشاركتنا أفكاركم والمواضيع التي ترغبون برؤيتها في الفعاليات القادمة، لنواصل معًا تقديم محتوى تاريخي متنوع وهادف.
@b_a2nn
ترقّبوا المزيد من الفعاليات القادمة مع قناة إمبراطورية المعلومات العراقية.
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @…
🥇 المركز الأول: @Mu_5xg
🥈 المركز الثاني: @m_or_1
🥉 المركز الثالث: @Raaolaalberto
🎉 تهانينا للفائزين! ✨
📚 تقدّم لكم قناة إمبراطورية المعلومات كل جديد ومفيد!
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @informationss_iq
من هو الفنان العراقي الذي أسس " جماعة الرواد" عام 1950، وأسهم في ترسيخ الاتجاهات الحديثة في الفن التشكيلي العراقي؟
"السؤال يحتاج إجابة كتابية في خانة التعليقات"
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @informationss_iq
من هو السياسي العراقي الذي ترأس " الحزب الوطني الديمقراطي" ، وشغل منصب وزير الاقتصاد في العهد الملكي، وكان من أبرز دعاة الإصلاح السياسي والاقتصادي؟
"السؤال يحتاج إجابة كتابية في خانة التعليقات"
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @informationss_iq
كان جعفر أبو التمن من أعضاء الأسرة المالكة العراقية، وتولى رئاسة الوزراء في العهد الملكي .
الإجابة تكون بـ 'صواب' أو 'خطأ' في خانة التعليقات، مع تصحيح الخطأ إن وُجد
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @informationss_iq
كان معروف الرصافي عضوًا في مجلس المبعوثان العثماني ممثلًا عن بغداد قبل تأسيس الدولة العراقية الحديثة .
الإجابة تكون بـ 'صواب' أو 'خطأ' في خانة التعليقات، مع تصحيح الخطأ إن وُجد.
@informationiq ⇚ 𝜗ৎ ⇛ @informationss_iq
❤5
Signed 🦢
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @informationss_iq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
س¹/ما المعركة التاريخية التي وقعت عام 378 م والتمس فيها القوط الغربيون الانتصار على الجيش الروماني ومقتل الإمبراطور فالنس، وكانت بداية الانهيار العسكري الفعلي للرومان؟
معركة أدريانوبل (أدرنة)37%
معركة كاناي11%
معركة أكتيوم19%
معركة شالون (سهول كاتالونيا)33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 440,687 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@informationss_iq named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@alaoan0 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@iiimmmoon named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الخوة النظيفة @BROTHERSIRQ · 223,627 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي @mohieq · 214,748 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار الطلاب - ابن بابل @iraqed8 · 1,432,891 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امبراطورية المعلومات العراقية” (@informationss_iq), 17,569 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informationss_iq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
