Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вова Информатик из ЕГЭЛЕНД

@informatic_el

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

35,101subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002095130188
TypeChannel
Username@informatic_el
DescriptionЭто питон 🐍 а это 👆— канал Вовы Информатика: здесь ты овладеешь мастерством питона и таблиц Каждый 4ый ученик сдал ЕГЭ на 90+ Подготовка в 2026: @infa_el1 Заявление №6038261530 о подаче сведений в Роскомнадзор: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68c14e4aa
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/informatic_el

Growth

34,78635,11634,9517 August 2026 — 35,056 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,958 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,872 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,803 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,786 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,116 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,101 subscribers35,1017 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,737–35,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:1535,101-15
12 Aug 2026, 09:2235,116+330
11 Aug 2026, 11:0534,786-17
10 Aug 2026, 12:4434,803-69
9 Aug 2026, 14:1734,872-86
8 Aug 2026, 15:4734,958-98
7 Aug 2026, 16:1535,056first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.63%
avg views ÷ 35,101 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,680
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held36 (31 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total96,394
Reactions total1,073
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,330
Videos
238
Links
891

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 46s
Average length
2m 23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,073 reactions across 36 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38736.1%
🍓17616.4%
🔥11110.3%
😎837.74%
❤‍🔥767.08%
😭534.94%
🌚393.63%
😁333.08%
🥰282.61%
👍171.58%
🙈171.58%
👏131.21%
💘131.21%
🤝90.839%
🐳40.373%
🤗30.28%
🤪30.28%
👨‍💻20.186%
😱20.186%
🤩20.186%
2 further kinds20.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,073reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC427 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Че выдаст ии на эту имбу? Ваши предположения в комментариях

🔥5

14 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC917 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Как ChatGPT поможет тебе готовиться к ЕГЭ по информатике? Использовать ИИ в подготовке — абсолютно нормально. Только важно понимать, что он реально умеет, а в каких моментах просто убьет твое время ✅В ЧЁМ ЧАТ GPT ДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНО ПОЛЕЗЕН 1️⃣ Найти ошибку в твоём коде GPT отлично находит очевидные косяки по типу потери скобки, неверная запись кода или опечатка 2️⃣ Уточнить, что делает конкретная часть кода Вот здес

3

12 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,810 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

История о том, как плесень начала хайповать Я готовлю к ЕГЭ по инфе, страшно сказать, уже 12 лет 🧐 За это время я учил ребят во всех возможных форматах: я сам ездил к ученикам, ученики ездили ко мне, занятия в группах очно, занятия по зуму, маленькие курсы, большие курсы… Так что поверьте, уж я-то точно знаю, что нужно каждому из вас, чтобы вырасти и сделать свой максимум 📈 В среднем каждый год: - четверть ребят

15🔥3🍓2🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,850 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Готовим с Ильясом кое-что полезное на выхи, чтобы узнать слушать всем круг

4

11 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,900 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13

11 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,010 views27 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, не забивайте на 4 задание, иначе у вас тоже будет 98 баллов, а не 100.

18😁9

11 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,010 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

МАКСИМААААЛЬНО ЛЕГКИЙ БАЛЛ Процент решаемости №4 на условие Фано очень большой В этом задании вам надо будет шифровать буквы и другие объекты через двоичные коды. А если конкретнее - рисовать ёлки 🌲 из нулей и единиц В файлике оч подробно описал ход решения этой задачки на полный балл начать подготовку к ЕГЭ 2027 по информатике | Клуб 11классников

8❤‍🔥1🍓1

10 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,310 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

Вещаю о своем мнении по поводу проги: 00:00 - начинать кодить в 11 кл - норм? 01:00 - почему прога - самый важный скилл для ЕГЭ? 02:20 - когда начинать прогать? Кст, на этой неделе у всех преподов будет куча пользы в каналах, так что подписывайтесь на всех ЗДЕСЬ

👏41🍓1🤝1

10 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,350 views337 reactionsread 14 August 2026

В каком классе начали изучать питон? 😎- в 10 🔥- в 11 🍓- раньше 🌚- ваще еще не начал/в школе паскаль

🍓149😎83🔥60🌚393🐳3

10 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈2,410 views39 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Приехал обсудить с коллегами с какого класса нужно изучать питон Ладно, на самом деле в офисе уже над годовым работаем с командой

❤‍🔥2210🤗3🥰3🍓1

9 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,420 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Кто уже записался на годовой ловите тик ток, чтобы время зря не тратить №1 можно решать автокодом и не ломать голову никогда Те, кто уже освоил ручное решение могут попробовать этот способ, может он кому-нибудь зайдёт лучше начать к подготовку к ЕГЭ 2027 по информатике I Клуб 11 классников

👏94❤‍🔥1🤔1

9 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,420 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Поймал дочку А вы ловите момент и записывайтесь на годовой курс, пока есть возможность записаться по сейчашним ценам. Завтра можно будет записаться только по повышенным ценам Жду всех в личке с кодовым "ПИТОН"

22❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @informatic_el. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,770 voters approx.

x = int(7.6) Чему равен х?

  1. 829%
  2. 744%
  3. 7.627%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 144,480 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вова Информатик из ЕГЭЛЕНД” (@informatic_el), 35,101 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informatic_el.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.