Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

Channel

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

@informaciar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002375510414
TypeChannel
Username@informaciar
Created27 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/informaciar

Growth

5767 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:135-2
12 Aug 2026, 19:037no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:177first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 27 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

527 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋18134.3%
👍8516.1%
💔6111.6%
🔥346.45%
💯326.07%
285.31%
❤‍🔥244.55%
🍓244.55%
💘244.55%
💅224.17%
122.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 527 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 21 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2025, 09:56 UTC≈1,070 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ краш лист Мин, Грейс, Ная, Лиля, Нур, Муня, Эли, Лили, Лесли и все из Qwer км. порядок не имеет значения

🔥21💅7💘43❤‍🔥31🍓1👍1

23 Jun 2025, 10:11 UTC≈1,350 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ︎ ☦️ мизуки/? 1? 20?? 21.12 ✝ me stan : i-dle, BlackPink, aespa, twice, i've, stray kids, baby monster, x:in , itzy, nmixx, illit, lesserafim, ichillin', allday project, newjeans, ketsay, bts, kiss of life, redvelvet, txt, izna, enhypen, loona, kiiikiii, meovv, unchild, h2h, qwer, cortis

14💋6❤‍🔥3🍓3💅3💘3💔21

27 Feb 2025, 12:27 UTC≈1,700 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ оформи подписку по братски,там очень интересно и полезно channels: love love love love

💋17🍓11❤‍🔥422💅2💔2💘2

27 Feb 2025, 12:24 UTC≈1,960 views403 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ кто ты? 💘-друг/подруга 🍓-родные 💋-прохожие ⚡️-одноклассники 💔-хз кто я ❤️-хочу подружиться 👍-из флуда/ролки/мью/вз 🔥-фанат ❤️‍🔥-влюблен 💅-бывшая подруга/друг 💯-пересекались где-то

💋157👍84💔57💯30💘15❤‍🔥14💅10🔥10

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @informaciar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤㅤㅤ” (@informaciar), 5 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informaciar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.