Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨

@infopiarvp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722769736
TypeChannel
Username@infopiarvp
Created31 May 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/infopiarvp

Growth

1014 Aug 2026, 19:06 — 10 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 10 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:0614 Aug 2026, 19:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:1710no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:0610first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 31 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮1341.9%
👍619.4%
39.68%
💩39.68%
🤬39.68%
😢26.45%
❤‍🔥13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2022 to 6 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2022, 19:00 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️АП‼️ отписка после вп юз @sofiko_rr канал @liebrown

🤬2

Signed веер👿

5 Oct 2022, 20:42 UTC241 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️АП‼️ отписка после вп юз @keisymillson канал @OCD_odi_fill и кинула в чс

1

Signed веер👿

31 Aug 2022, 19:16 UTC400 viewsread 14 August 2026

‼️антипиар‼️ отписка после вп юз @beddli канал @feiallis @layteri @elizabev @AZI_ZEH канал @narezkyi

Signed 💗

30 Aug 2022, 12:19 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️антипиар‼️ отписалась после вп+0 говорит,что больше нет у неё каналов и от моего вп никто к ней не пришёл.позже начала угрожать,что сделает мне ап на канале своей «лип».после чего удалила переписку ее юз @lavwwe не советую в дальнейшем делать с ней вп. пересылайте на свои каналы

2😢2🤬1

Signed 💗{бан до 30}

8 Aug 2022, 10:27 UTC≈1,130 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026

‼️антипиар‼️ отписалась после баттла каналов юз @fljwwx не советую принимать её голоса.

🤮13❤‍🔥1👍1

Signed 💗

1 Jun 2022, 16:45 UTCviews —

𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨 pinned «~гайд по каналу: @euphorf0 •ВП +0 с подпиской на @euphorf0 и на @infopiarvp сразу прислать шаблон и скрин подписки(сколько держать договоримся) писать @zveravp •ОП делаю! от 10 до 50 пм. остальное будем добивать долго. -сразу кидайте пост, скрин и на сколько…»

1 Jun 2022, 16:45 UTC831 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

~гайд по каналу: @euphorf0 •ВП +0 с подпиской на @euphorf0 и на @infopiarvp сразу прислать шаблон и скрин подписки(сколько держать договоримся) писать @zveravp •ОП делаю! от 10 до 50 пм. остальное будем добивать долго. -сразу кидайте пост, скрин и на сколько пм (просмотров) вы хотите !В КОНЦЕ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО СКРИН! отписка- антипиар.если канал не интересен- просто киньте в архив.в чем проблема? наши админы: админ по

👍5💩3

Signed 💗

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @infopiarvp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨” (@infopiarvp), 10 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infopiarvp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.