Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Контент продаёт

Channel

Контент продаёт

@infograf_prodal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,038subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910697633
TypeChannel
Username@infograf_prodal
DescriptionО визуальном контенте для маркетплейсов (МП). Как поднять продажи на МП и как организовать свой доход, создавая контент для них. Курс AI-контент продаёт https://contentmakermp.ru ИП Пулькин А.Г. ИНН 291401614620 Оферта clck.ru/3GSH8o РКН 7075104726
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/infograf_prodal

Growth

11,99312,04512,0197 August 2026 — 11,995 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,993 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,999 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,003 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,014 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,019 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,023 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,029 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,045 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,041 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,039 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,045 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,038 subscribers12,0387 August 202621 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,985–12,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 18:2512,038-7
20 Aug 2026, 18:1312,045+6
19 Aug 2026, 16:3412,039-2
18 Aug 2026, 15:2312,041-4
17 Aug 2026, 14:3312,045+16
16 Aug 2026, 06:0512,029+6
14 Aug 2026, 16:5612,023+4
13 Aug 2026, 06:5412,019+5
12 Aug 2026, 08:4512,014+11
11 Aug 2026, 05:4412,003+1
10 Aug 2026, 06:3012,002+3
9 Aug 2026, 09:1111,999+6
8 Aug 2026, 07:4511,993-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:1911,995first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 12,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held16 (9 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total22,070
Reactions total558
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
522
Videos
45
Links
252

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,535 reactions across 16 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66243.1%
🔥35323.0%
23415.2%
👍1217.88%
👏322.08%
🤣261.69%
❤‍🔥251.63%
🙉191.24%
🤯161.04%
🥰80.521%
😁60.391%
🤝60.391%
40.261%
💊40.261%
🏆30.195%
👌30.195%
💯30.195%
🌚20.13%
🤔20.13%
🤩20.13%
4 further kinds40.261%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,535reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,130 views34 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤯16🔥116🍾1

18 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,520 views68 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥3814👍12💊4

5 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈3,020 views118 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Собрал систему, которая делает 10000 карточек товара за 15000 рублей в месяц В последнее время всерьез увлёкся автоматизацией контента для e-com. Это практически не раскрытая ниша, потому что технология очень свежая, а как ее применить знают вообще единицы. К нам обратился заказчик, который продаёт оплётки на руль. В ассортименте 22 вида и каждая подходит примерно к 500 актуальным моделям авто. Он придумал ход, ко

🔥6928👍134🤩2🥰2

3 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈2,950 views57 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Без умения адаптироваться, каждый станет невостребованным. А что же делать, если не понимаешь, как адаптироваться? Мы работаем в такой сфере, где нужно уметь меняться ПОСТОЯННО, чтобы оставаться актуальным. В начале века обучались фотошопу, потом фигме, далее ИИ. Но что делать, если сам рынок штормит и заказчики терпят убытки? К такой фундаментальной проблеме многие из нас не были готовы. Один из вариантов, который

29👍23❤‍🔥5

30 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈3,470 views80 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥5416👍5👏3😁2

26 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈3,740 views102 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Posted without readable text

50🔥32❤‍🔥9👏6🥰3👍2

25 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,020 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026

4 шага: Как не угодить в кризис при текущей ситуации Друзья, привет! Вчера у нас прошел вебинар, где мы разобрали стратегию поведения дизайнера инфографики. Сейчас ру рынок штормит, поэтому нам нужно адаптироваться и предпринимать меры, если вы уже в рынке. А если вы еще не в рынке, то логичным действием будет посмотреть сразу шире. Эфир получился эмоциональным и классным. Если нет возможности его посмотреть, то во

293👍3🔥3🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC≈3,220 views60 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🔴 Запись прямого эфира Разобрали несколько стратегий, которые можно применять дизайнеру инфографики в текущей ситуации с маркетплейсами. Как не потерять и даже вырасти в доходе в этот период. Если есть вопросы, то можете писать мне в личку @apulkin https://a.teleboss.ru/play/b5c3dcc5-aa20-4f68-bb4d-19fcec70fab9

35🔥146❤‍🔥2👍2🥰1

22 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,990 views63 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Моушн-анимация без навыков Друзья, привет! Подготовил новое видео на канал и в этом видео я всю анимацию (а ее там много) собрал с помощью Claude Code + Remotion. Для меня, как для YouTube-автора, всегда было привлекательно поставить какую-нибудь анимацию в видео, но я не делал этого, потому что НЕ УМЕЛ и она сложна в производстве. А если заказывать ее, то это долго и нет прямой зависимости, что она как-то будет о

32🔥18👍1111

20 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,990 views294 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Ситуация со складами WB и как это повлияет на рынок визуального контента Безусловно, все уже знают, что произошло с двумя складами WB. Поэтому сегодня решил написать об этом, а не выпускать плановый пост про тексты. Я пока не видел цифр ущерба, но денежные цифры нам ничего не дадут. Мы все равно не сможем их понять объективно и не сможем представить масштаб. Нам известно, что пострадали люди, как в самих складах в

22153👍14🏆3👌3

16 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈4,750 views250 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Posted without readable text

191🔥39👍152🎉1🥰1😍1

15 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈3,860 views68 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Дарю Шаблонизатор для Amazon за анкету! Друзья, привет! Не так давно мы создали новый Шаблонизатор, который заточен именно под Amazon. Я помню с эфиров, что желающих выйти на эту площадку было много, но у всех будет одна задача: адаптировать или создать новое портфолио для этого рынка. С соблюдением технических требований площадки, в нативной стилистике и на английском языке. Шаблонизатор для Amazon поможет вам эт

32🔥24👍6🤝6

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @infograf_prodal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 145,510 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Контент продаёт” (@infograf_prodal), 12,038 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infograf_prodal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.