Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for InfoCatólica

Channel

InfoCatólica

@infocatolica_oficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,280subscribers

-164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263215429
TypeChannel
Username@infocatolica_oficial
DescriptionTelegram de InfoCatólica: https://www.infocatolica.com
Created18 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/infocatolica_oficial

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,2809,4449,3626 August 2026 — 9,444 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,443 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,438 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,429 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,425 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,412 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,404 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,394 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,386 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,376 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,368 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,362 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,353 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,342 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,322 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,320 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,316 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,315 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,308 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,298 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,294 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,285 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,280 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,255–9,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 20:579,280-5
5 Nov 2026, 19:579,285-9
2 Nov 2026, 14:089,294-4
30 Oct 2026, 03:349,298-10
27 Oct 2026, 01:079,308-7
21 Oct 2026, 02:289,315-1
17 Oct 2026, 17:589,316-4
15 Oct 2026, 02:579,320-2
12 Oct 2026, 02:219,322-20
5 Oct 2026, 07:199,342-11
27 Sept 2026, 04:579,353-9
13 Sept 2026, 19:229,362-6
10 Sept 2026, 11:199,368-8
5 Sept 2026, 06:369,376-10
1 Sept 2026, 00:189,386-8
28 Aug 2026, 20:549,394-10
25 Aug 2026, 15:139,404-8
22 Aug 2026, 17:169,412-13
18 Aug 2026, 23:179,425-3
15 Aug 2026, 18:149,428first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 9,280 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held166 (1 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total54,374
Reactions total1,802
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 23:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,620
Links
≈7,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,696 reactions across 158 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏2,08831.2%
❤93714.0%
👍93614.0%
😈6139.15%
👏5177.72%
🤮2413.60%
😢1952.91%
👎1722.57%
🤔1291.93%
🤡1151.72%
😱1081.61%
😡841.25%
🔥741.11%
🤬681.02%
😭550.821%
💯530.792%
💩520.777%
🤯350.523%
❤‍🔥300.448%
🥱280.418%
35 further kinds1662.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 23:03 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Fundación Gates financia encuentro de Asís Se banalizan graves males morales https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56360&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

😱3😈1

9 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC215 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Lunes, 9 de noviembre de 2026 «No se resignen a las voces que repiten que la familia cristiana está superada», pide el Papa en Buenos Aires Del Cottolengo de Claypole a 2,5 millones de fieles https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56367&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=bltnte El Card. Zen pide al Papa que conceda «unas largas vacaciones» a Grech y Hollerich y que sustituya al Card. Fernánde…

👍2

9 Nov 2026, 20:03 UTC512 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Los obispos noruegos celebran que el Parlamento rechace en comisión estudiar la legalización de la eutanasia Noruega frena la eutanasia antes del primer paso https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56364&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏32👏5❤1

9 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC680 views33 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Las verdades fundamentales «nunca pueden ser legítimamente sometidas a votación» Los obispos de Virginia responden a la aprobación del aborto y la redefinición del matrimonio en la Constitución estatal https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56365&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

👍19🙏10👏4

9 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC802 views72 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

El Card. Zen pide al Papa que conceda «unas largas vacaciones» a Grech y Hollerich y que sustituya al Card. Fernández «Si ahora pretendemos acomodarnos al mundo, traicionamos nuestra propia misión» https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56366&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏34💯20👍8❤5👏2🔥2🥰1

9 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC861 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

León XIV, en Buenos Aires: «¿Qué lugar ocupan en nuestras decisiones quienes todavía no han nacido?» «Ninguna generación comienza la patria desde cero» https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56362&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏23❤10👍2🔥1🗿1🥰1

7 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,240 views59 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pensilvania y Wisconsin, en el punto de mira del suicidio asistido Tras las elecciones de mitad de mandato https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56348&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

😈37😢11🙏7😱3👍1

7 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,270 views56 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

León XIV pide desde Uruguay a los obispos de todo el mundo jornadas de oración y ayuno por las vocaciones «Custodien el silencio de la oración, la escucha de la Palabra, el encuentro con Cristo en la Eucaristía» https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56351&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏35❤10👍6👏3🗿1🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,380 views53 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Mons. Reig Pla: «Morían por el alma católica de España» «La raíz última del martirio está en el bautismo y en la Eucaristía» https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56337&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

❤36🙏13👏2👍1🕊1

6 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,390 views41 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Dos obispos chinos defendieron la «sinización» de la Iglesia Católica en China Una capitulación ante la dictadura de Xi Jinping https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56338&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏14😈10😭9👎3👍2💩1🗿1🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,330 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

¿Qué espera Adveniat del viaje del Papa? Lo previsible La poderosa organización alemana de ayuda a Hispanoamérica https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56340&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏9😈7👍4

6 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,270 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

La Fraternidad de San Pedro supera los 600 miembros con una edad media de 39 años Apunta que 2027 será parecido https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=56334&utm_medium=telegram&utm_source=telegram&utm_campaign=sngte

🙏22❤9👍5👎1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @infocatolica_oficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Foros de la Virgen
@forosdelavirgen · 26,317
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
EJÉRCITO REMANENTE 🏹 NOTICIAS
@ejercitoremanente · 19,610
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Canal de Agustín Laje
@lajeagustin · 26,725
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“InfoCatólica” (@infocatolica_oficial), 9,280 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infocatolica_oficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.