Channel
@info_ruby_veil
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003544333668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @info_ruby_veil |
| Created | 17 January 2026 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/info_ruby_veil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 4 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
โ. ๐๐ หโ ๐ดโด !! ๐ฒโฏ๐๐ธโด๐โฏ ๐โด โ๐๐ท๐ ๐ฑโฏ๐พ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐พ๐ธ๐โฏ๐๐ ' ๐๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ ' ๐ฌ๐๐ถ๐๐พ๐๐ ' ๐ซ๐๐ฐ ' ๐๐๐น ๐ทโฏ๐โด๐๐น ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐นโฏ ๐ปโด๐ ๐โด๐
๐ 1
. . . ๐๐น๐๐พ๐๐ โโฏ๐๐๐ // โด๐๐โฏ๐ โ๐๐ท๐ // ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐
๐ 1
โ ๐ค โ ... ๐ซ๐๐ฐ ... ... ๐๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ ... ... ๐ฌ๐๐ถ๐๐พ๐๐ ... ๐ฒโฏ๐๐ธโด๐โฏ ๐ฒโฏ ๐ถ๐โฏ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐โด ๐โฏโฏ ๐โด๐ ๐ฝโฏ๐โฏ ๐ฒโฏ โ๐ถ๐โฏ โฌโฏโฏ๐ ๐ฒ๐ถ๐พ๐๐พ๐๐ฐ โฑโด๐ ๐ดโด๐
๐ 1
ะะฟ 0+ ั ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบะพะน 50+ ะฑะตะท ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบะธ ะัะธั ะพะด ะพั 2 ะดะพ 4 ะะฟ ะดะตัะถะธะผ 24 ัะฐัะฐ
๐ 1
๐๐vatars . . . ๐ uality . . . everything for you here!! ๐ค
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @info_ruby_veil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 161,491 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๏นซ ๐๐ท๐ฏ๐ธ . . .โ (@info_ruby_veil), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info_ruby_veil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.