Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[Лив из инфокм] 𝐼𝓃𝒻𝑜 𝒽𝑒𝒸𝒽𝒾 .ᐟ.ᐟ

@info_hechi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

95subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003938336130
TypeChannel
Username@info_hechi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/info_hechi

Growth

95979612 Aug 2026, 06:02 — 97 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:15 — 97 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:58 — 95 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:0212 Aug 2026, 21:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5895-2
12 Aug 2026, 06:1597no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:0297first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 4 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53773966491339011875914.8%
custom 53102177771669784495313.3%
custom 53100425768610423495112.8%
custom 52987456575263502784711.8%
custom 53079955009584896814110.3%
custom 52447804156543332334010.0%
custom 5445276622972293287328.00%
🍓317.75%
🤡174.25%
💘102.50%
custom 540886302265340639592.25%
custom 528295185159818715182.00%
custom 521112007835074538710.25%
custom 528295278360609065410.25%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC454 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

уᨵׁׅׅ𝙪... 🤩

  1. 💕 ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ 𝙣ᨵׁׅׅ𝘬ᵉꪀ𝐭 🍥🍥79%
  2. 💕 ꩇׁׅ֪݊𝐚ʳժׁׅ݊ꏂʀ 🤩🤩21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 537739664913390118720custom 524478041565433323315custom 529874565752635027815custom 531021777716697844913custom 530799550095848968112custom 531004257686104234912custom 52111200783507453871custom 52829518515981871511

3 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC409 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alnstkinand

❌# 🤩﹔ да, я кинню мизи, и я не знаю какая на самом деле,ведь многие мои привычки и фразы были взяты от других людей. 📶да, я кинню и... | @alnstkinand

custom 530799550095848968116custom 531021777716697844916custom 529874565752635027813custom 531004257686104234913custom 537739664913390118713custom 544527662297229328712custom 52829518515981871512custom 52829527836060906541

21 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC378 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍 💘 🤩🤩 🍥🤩౨ৎ 🎀🎀 (๑′ᴗ‵๑) ФД ๋๋࣭ 𓏲 ๋๋ ˶ 🤩 . 𖥔 ˖♡˚₊‧ 🎀 𝐼 𝓃𝑒𝑒𝒹 🤍🤍 ЗА КОТОРЫЕ Я ШАРЮ!! 💕🥹 🥹🥹🥹 ❤️ 🦷🦷 🦷 🎀🎀

custom 531004257686104234917custom 524478041565433323315custom 531021777716697844915custom 530799550095848968113custom 529874565752635027812custom 537739664913390118711custom 544527662297229328711custom 52829518515981871512

8 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC531 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

────୨ৎ──── ✉️✉️ ⋆౨ৎ˚⟡ 🤩 ࣪ ⋆.𝄞 ˚hׁׅꫀׁׅܻ݊chׁׅɑׁׅ ˚༘ 🥹જ⁀➴♡ ೀ 🤩 › ׅ꯱ᨵׁׅׅ5 𓂃🤍🤩🤩😀🤩 𝖽𝗆 : 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗇 : tgk 🤩 ꒷︶ 🎼 𓂃ෆ˚ 🐾🐾 🥹🥹 Boost 🤩 Резы 🤩 Архив 🐾🐾🐾🐾 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ 🥹🥹🥹 🤩 : 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎀🎀🎀 Зоо, 🎀 педо, микро и тд 🤩 игнор без весомой причины 🤩 старше 30 🤩 всё 🔇 общение держится на мне 🤩 оскорбление религий 🖤 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

🍓31🤡17custom 537739664913390118715💘10custom 524478041565433323310custom 53100425768610423499custom 53102177771669784499custom 54088630226534063959

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @info_hechi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

уᨵׁׅׅ𝙪... 🤩

  1. 💕 ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ 𝙣ᨵׁׅׅ𝘬ᵉꪀ𝐭 🍥🍥79%
  2. 💕 ꩇׁׅ֪݊𝐚ʳժׁׅ݊ꏂʀ 🤩🤩21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,150,921 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Лив из инфокм] 𝐼𝓃𝒻𝑜 𝒽𝑒𝒸𝒽𝒾 .ᐟ.ᐟ” (@info_hechi), 95 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info_hechi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.