Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

)))

@infoRelapse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003090806385
TypeChannel
Username@infoRelapse
Created21 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/infoRelapse

Growth

812 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:3112 Aug 2026, 16:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:178no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:318first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 21 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1378.1%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
72.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held7 (21 August 202528 July 2026)
Views total441
Reactions total239
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54226181321602002119122.9%
custom 51884363460158788368521.4%
custom 54426427514578929297919.9%
custom 54227629799322678775112.8%
custom 52581073083317892984711.8%
custom 5210713813099244892164.03%
custom 535969665082041518792.27%
custom 535040947123757049082.02%
custom 523783057874881911271.76%
custom 523596732315157007741.01%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC102 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 518843634601587883625custom 52378305787488191127custom 52107138130992448925custom 52359673231515700774

28 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC111 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

🫃 Рецидив is..

  1. innocent.29%
  2. guilty.71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 542261813216020021125custom 525810730833178929823custom 544264275145789292918custom 518843634601587883610custom 54227629799322678779custom 53596966508204151875custom 53504094712375704904

28 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTC116 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❨❨.. ﹫ Рецидив. 🫥 ┈ 𐐼ׅ𝗇𝗒 𝗉𝗋ׁ𝗇. 🤔 ✦ 𖥻 𐐼𝗇ׁ⃬𑄝𝗇. 🎁 ⫘⫘ 𖥻 𝖽𝗆. 🔤 ꗃ My w𑄝rk. 𓏴 ׁ🌟 Telegraph. 𝅦 ִ ֹ ✨️ I۪STP ⥂ sp5. 🌟🌟 ♯ 𐐼f𐐼b

custom 542261813216020021129custom 525810730833178929824custom 542276297993226787723custom 54426427514578929298custom 51884363460158788367custom 52107138130992448925custom 53504094712375704904custom 53596966508204151874

6 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC123 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544264275145789292927custom 518843634601587883620custom 542261813216020021119custom 52107138130992448926

4 May 2026, 12:22 UTC191 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yesikinroblox

❱ ❱ ❱ — [ 🤩 ]𖥻 да, я кинню Артфула, и я не особо люблю разговаривать. @yesikinroblox | ᴨᴩᴇдᴧожиᴛь идᴇю. . . | #DieofDeath

custom 544264275145789292926custom 518843634601587883623custom 542276297993226787719custom 542261813216020021118

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @infoRelapse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTCAnonymous Poll51 voters

🫃 Рецидив is..

  1. innocent.29%
  2. guilty.71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 821,677 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“)))” (@infoRelapse), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infoRelapse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.