Channel
@infliv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
79subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001260758227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infliv |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infliv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 79 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 80 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 41.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello Inflian, We have detected unusual on-chain activity involving IFV that occurred earlier yesterday. As a precaution, we are actively investigating the matter with our internal team and security partners. At this stage, systems remain operational, and we are closely monitoring all related transactions. Our priority is to ensure the stability of the ecosystem and protect our community. INFLIV Team
👍2
Thank You, Infliv Community 🙏🚀 The voting has been successfully completed with 100% votes in favor of the proposal. We sincerely thank every community member who participated, reviewed the proposal, and cast their vote. Your trust, support, and active governance make Infliv stronger, more transparent, and future-ready. This success reflects the power of our community-driven ecosystem. Let’s keep building Infliv t…
👍2
Voting Update 🔔 We’ve published a new proposal to adjust the Infliv Token block emission value, following the BSC Fermi hard fork. 🗳️ IFV token holders are encouraged to review the proposal and cast their vote. 🔗 Vote here: https://snapshot.box/#/s:infliv.eth/proposal/0x0da92f5a0b12268e60ceef9e82e017888e8bf0f6bdad86b0c8d8bc7556c7a89e #Infliv #DAO #Governance #BSC #CryptoVote
Community Update 🚀 Due to the BSC Fermi hard fork, we are proposing an update to the Infliv Token contract related to the block mint value. A community voting will be held on Monday, 2/2/2026. We request all community members to actively participate in this vote and support us in making the Infliv token contract and protocol stronger, more stable, and future-ready. Your vote matters. Let’s build Infliv together 🤝
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Refer & Earn Rewards: Earn 50 IFV tokens for every successful referral who completes KYC verification and First Swap. In Phase 1, participants received 200 IFV tokens per referral. Now, during Phase 2, you can still earn 50 IFV tokens (worth $5) for each verified referral — but only until Phase 3 begins. ⚡ Don’t miss this limited-time opportunity — refer now and grab your rewards before Phase 2 ends!
"🚀💸 Infliv Token reaches $0.098(₹8.39)! 📈 Are you considering adding this growing token to your portfolio for potential gains? Don't miss out on this rising star! Add it to your portfolio and unlock potential returns with IFV! 💰 #InflivToken #Crypto #Opportunity"
🎉2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @infliv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
At what price would you like to see the IFV token in July!!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 27 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IFV Token Official🔹” (@infliv), 79 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infliv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.