6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -180. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,575–9,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 00:33
9,602
-40
17 Aug 2026, 19:53
9,642
-39
14 Aug 2026, 14:05
9,681
-38
10 Aug 2026, 23:51
9,719
-58
7 Aug 2026, 19:46
9,777
-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:46
9,782
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 9 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
66
Videos
5
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
312 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
115
36.9%
🔥
51
16.3%
⚡
48
15.4%
👌
29
9.29%
🤝
26
8.33%
❤🔥
22
7.05%
👏
8
2.56%
😢
7
2.24%
✍
3
0.962%
🏆
3
0.962%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2024 to 20 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @incrypted_future. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2024 to 20 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет ребята! 🤝
Как вы там? Как проживаете?
Я новый владелец этого канала и с этих пор буду стараться активно вести его!
Я: Ульяна, в крипте давно
Хочу вам рассказать про свою бесплатную группу (оплату не берём): @demotrid
Там есть:
Обучение, 📚
Стратегии, 📈
Обсуждение, 💭
Идеи и мысли трейдеров, 💡
Сигналы от меня, 🚨
И прочее.
Нас уже 1500 человек!👥 Ждём и тебя в рядах! 🫵
Присоединиться: @demotrid (Прочтите Пр…
WalletConnect запустит токен и проведет аирдроп
Команда WalletConnect сообщила, что запустит собственный токен Connect (WCT) в основной сети OP Optimism, а также проведет аирдроп 185 млн WCT. Раздача начнется 24 сентября и завершится 11 октября.
Два победителя вчерашнего конкурса объявлены и получили по 5$. Вроде мелочь, но приятно 😊
Будет активность в канале и в чате? https://t.me/+fW3Wu2rsAD1mNDIy
Конкурсы будут на постоянной основе ✅
Накидываем реакций.
Возможно сегодня ещё один розыгрыш сделаем ❤️
Утреннее состояние рынка
- BTC ≈$58 200 (-0.54%)
- ETH ≈$2 280 (+0.21%)
- Капитализация рынка ≈$2T (-0.10%)
- Индекс страха и жадности: 33 (страх)
- Индекс альтсезона: 33
Два победителя в конкурсе
1. @nikita_fleshkin
2. Fik (юзера нету)
Мои поздравления Вам
Благодарю всех за участие 🤝❤️
Хотите ещё подобные конкурсы? Накидывайте реакции
Напомню, что через 23 минуты будут два победителя. Для участия нужно лишь выполнить два условия.
Быть подписанным на мой канал и канал Volk Community. Он указан под кнопкой "участвовать"
Каждому по 5$ ❤️
💰💰💰
Кстати в этом втором розыгрыше, который проводим в коллаборации с Volk Community.
💰💰💰👍⚡️
Тоже розыгрыш на двоих. Каждому по 5$. Бот определит победителей сам. За каждого приглашённого друга получаете ещё один билетик для розыгрыша. Шансы увеличиваются и они есть у каждого
А розыгрыш уже менее через 15 часов
👍8👌3🔥3⚡1🏆1
Signed Incrypted Cat
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @incrypted_future. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@incrypted_future named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nikita_fleshkin named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Growth @AirdropGrowth · 72,651 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Incrypted Future” (@incrypted_future), 9,602 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/incrypted_future.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
