wip ✍️ С этой работой я уже где-то на грани с психбольницей— (шутка... наверное)
custom 522418112114251176310custom 54719058582941341013💘2custom 52175028979687866652

Channel
@inanis_sonus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001640213196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inanis_sonus |
| Description | ☀️ Audentes Fortuna Iuvat ☀️ ~КИРИБАН НА 100 ПОДПИСЧИКОВ~ Коммишены: открыты. Трейды: открыты Основная информация в закрепе. По вопросам: @inanissues |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inanis_sonus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 79 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 79 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (27 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 603 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
313 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5224181121142511763 | 115 | 36.7% | |
| custom 5471905858294134101 | 63 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5256217926448468100 | 32 | 10.2% | |
| 💘 | 31 | 9.90% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 7.35% | |
| custom 5319050721008562338 | 17 | 5.43% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 4.15% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 2.24% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.92% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.958% | |
| custom 5217502897968786665 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.319% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inanis_sonus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
wip ✍️ С этой работой я уже где-то на грани с психбольницей— (шутка... наверное)
custom 522418112114251176310custom 54719058582941341013💘2custom 52175028979687866652
wip я тихонечко сошел с ума со всеми этими штучками и механизмами, но как же мне нравится то, что получается Осталось только покрасить 😁
custom 52241811211425117639💋6custom 54719058582941341013💘2
Я резко вспомнил, что у меня полыхает дедлайн в мультиаске и быстренько сделал ответ 😁 Цвия: Имир, ты куда, Хель тебя дери, собрался? Имир: Имир лететь на море, Имир устать от это всё Прим. автора: — Королевскую примулу с острова Ява также называют "цветком смерти". Примула, расцветающая не в свое время, ознаменует скорое извержение вулканов, землетрясение, начало катаклизмов. С ней и этим ее свойством связано мно…
custom 52241811211425117639custom 54719058582941341014💘2custom 52562179264484681002❤🔥1
Мы наконец-то закончили ✨ Обменялись лайнами под покраску с @soverrsh и @in_generrre Получилось, как минимум, очень интересно, как максимум, испытали друг друга на прочность ахаха 1. лайн @soverrsh, покрас мой 💙 2. лайн @in_generrre, покрас @soverrsh 😐 3. лайн мой, покрас @in_generrre 🚬 В комментарии еще отдельно скину лайны, вдруг кому-то будет интересно
custom 52241811211425117639custom 54719058582941341014custom 52562179264484681003❤🔥2🍓1💘1
Лисий вип Чем больше нравится мне идея и скетч, тем дольше я вожусь с лайном и покрасом, как оказалось...
custom 522418112114251176312custom 54719058582941341016💘3custom 52562179264484681003
аааааа фурри короче фроглинг Инанис да накнец-то нормально оформленное и с редизом небольшим
custom 52241811211425117637❤4custom 54719058582941341013
С подругами решили обменяться лайнами и зарендерить работы друг друга. Моя деловая кощька.
custom 522418112114251176310custom 53190507210085623386custom 54719058582941341015💘1
Случился некоторый подарок для чудесной @in_generrre с ее чудесными девочками из КР
custom 522418112114251176325custom 547190585829413410115custom 525621792644846810012🍓4💘1
Всем привет. Вы же тут живы, да?.. Я немного откисаю под учебными завалами, надеюсь, как сдам экзамены смогу вернуться и сделать еще много красивых картинок. А пока скетчик небольшой летающей головы 🤲🏻🤍
custom 522418112114251176316custom 52562179264484681008custom 54719058582941341018🍓1💘1
Наверное, я могу назвать это моей первой работой с осознанно нарисованным фоном
🔥13❤7💘5custom 54719058582941341011
Котячий скетчик. Желание рисовать Альфиков у меня примерно: ⬆️⬆️⬆️ Желание рисовать фоны конечно: ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Но Альфики без фона теряют 50% шарма, остальное держится на том, что они выглядят как домашние кошки, но в одежке 😭🤲🏻
custom 531905072100856233811💘4custom 54719058582941341012🙏1
Нашел старенький лайн, доделал старенький лайн
❤12custom 54719058582941341014custom 52241811211425117633custom 52562179264484681001
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @inanis_sonus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 508,527 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iNANiS” (@inanis_sonus), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inanis_sonus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.