We're bringing them back

Channel
We're in a clock.
@inaclock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002123719868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inaclock |
| Description | It's flat |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inaclock |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 16 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 382
- Videos
- 366
- Links
- 242
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8m 09s
- Average length
- 1m 38s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Everything reminds me of her.
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEmoJZWKIzY
𝔑𝔢𝔴 𝔄𝔤𝔢𝔱𝔞𝔯𝔡 & 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡
Video, posted without a caption
14 miles from 8 inch observation
Moisture in air, atmospheric refraction, and angular resolution
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
En 1969, l'ordinateur de bord de l'Apollo 11, avec seulement 64 Ko de mémoire, aurait prétendument permis à des hommes d'atterrir sur la Lune. Il traitait 40 000 instructions par seconde, une infime partie de la puissance d'un smartphone. Et pourtant, tu crois qu'il a calculé avec précision les trajectoires lunaires grâce à la mécanique orbitale.... Mon ami...rend toi à la raison... @LabHyp_Terre_Plane 🗃 **Le Co…
1/6 Gravity On The Moon https://t.me/FlatEarthAntiquityArchive
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @inaclock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@hackernewslive · 28,3682 posts𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡〘 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕪 ℍ𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕟𝕣𝕪 〙
@Atheoid · 1,8271 post▰▱ LΛBYRINTHΞ ▱▰
@Du_Labyrinthe_aux_Hypotheses · 16,0181 postFlat Earth Antiquity Archive
@FlatEarthAntiquityArchive · 3,4981 postDu Labyrinthe aux Hypothèses Secours
@Terre_Plane · 1,3041 postGod's strongest Dvmpster Divers 2: electric boogaloo
@divingdump · 1,5151 postDr. Melissa Sell
@drmelissasell · 4,9931 post𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞
@flatearth · 44,7401 postAll sorts of shit
@jebanistikafcjakaja · 1,4921 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Du_Labyrinthe_aux_Hypotheses · 16,0182 posts▰▱ TΞRЯΞ PLΛNΞ ▱▰
@LabHyp_Terre_Plane · 2,3642 posts𝕹𝖊𝖜 𝕬𝖌𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉
@Anti_NewAge · 9281 post𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔦𝔡〘 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕪 ℍ𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕟𝕣𝕪 〙
@Atheoid · 1,8271 post𝕱𝖑𝖆𝖙 𝕰𝖆𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖊𝖙𝖞
@flatearth · 44,7401 postFlat Earth Antiquity Archive
@FlatEarthAntiquityArchive · 3,4981 postRemarks
@remarks · 26,3091 postDu Labyrinthe aux Hypothèses Secours
@Terre_Plane · 1,3041 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“We're in a clock.” (@inaclock), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inaclock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.