📍آخرین نرخ ها ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۳ قیمت دلار : 269 هزار تومان قیمت تتر : 270 هزار تومان قیمت یورو : 302 هزار تومان نفت برنت : 101 دلار قیمت درهم: 73,219 هزار تومان قیمت نقره: 461 هزار تومان طلای ۱۸ عیار : 25,9 میلیون تومان قیمت سکه امامی : 264 میلیون تومان انس طلا : 4,038 دلار انس نقره : 51,8 دلار بیت کوین: 78,4 بورس: 7,912,000 📲 @imtiaz_capital

Channel
imtiaz capital امتیاز
@imtiaz_capital
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,623subscribers
-1,721 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001491915422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @imtiaz_capital @sona_samipoor |
| Description | مطالب کاربردی و مفهومی سرمایه گذاری و معاملات طلا به زبان ساده پشتیبان کانال : @Imtiaz_support ربات اموزش و عضویت در کانال سیگنال: @Sonagold_Fx_bot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imtiaz_capital |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:38 | 16,623 | -26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 16,649 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 16,663 | +12,460 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 4,203 | -12,479 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:00 | 16,682 | -34 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 16,716 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 16,747 | +12,508 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 4,239 | -12,524 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:08 | 16,763 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 16,780 | +12,519 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 4,261 | -12,543 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 16,804 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 16,819 | -26 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 16,845 | +12,548 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 4,297 | -12,569 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 16,866 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 16,885 | -40 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:10 | 16,925 | +12,546 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 4,379 | -12,578 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 16,957 | first reading |
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.65%
- avg views ÷ 16,623 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 440
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.721%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 150 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,874 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 779
- Videos
- 52
- Links
- 180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 44s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
388 reactions across 80 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 311 | 80.2% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 13.9% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 3.09% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.32% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.258% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.258% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ریزش کوین ترامپ پس از باخت در انتخابات 🔻
یادت باشه، کانال سیگنال معتبر قرار نیست بهت وعده سود قطعی بده. باید بتونی عملکردش رو بررسی کنی، ریسک معاملاتش رو بشناسی و بدونی وقتی معامله به حد ضرر میرسه چه اتفاقی میافته. اعتماد با ادعا ساخته نمیشه؛ با شفافیت و عملکرد قابل بررسی ساخته میشه. اگر میخوای با جزئیات روند کانال سیگنال ما آشنا بشی به پشتیبانی پیام بده👇🏻 📲 @Imtiaz_support
❤2
یه تست ساده! فرض کن دو کانال رو میبینی: کانال اول: وینریت ۹۰٪ اعلام میکنه، اما فقط معاملات موفقش رو منتشر میکنه. کانال دوم: تمام معاملات، حتی ضررهاش رو ثبت میکنه و گزارش عملکرد منظم داره. به نظرت کدوم قابل اعتمادتره؟🧐
❤3
قبل از اعتماد به هر کانال سیگنال، این ۴ مورد رو بررسی کن: ۱. آیا سیگنالها قبل از حرکت قیمت منتشر میشن؟ ۲. آیا معاملات ضررده هم مثل معاملات سودده نمایش داده میشن؟ ۳. نقطه ورود، حد ضرر و حد سود مشخصه؟ ۴. آیا نتیجه معاملات در یک بازه زمانی قابل بررسیه، یا فقط چندتا سود بزرگ نشون داده میشه؟
اگه فردا بخوای عضو یه کانال سیگنال بشی، از کجا میفهمی واقعاً میشه بهش اعتماد کرد؟ تعداد ممبرها؟ اسکرینشات سودها؟ یا ادعای وینریت بالا؟ اتفاقاً هیچکدوم بهتنهایی دلیل قابل اعتمادی نیستن!⚠️
📍آخرین نرخ ها ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۲ قیمت دلار : 273 هزار تومان قیمت تتر : 271 هزار تومان قیمت یورو : 305 هزار تومان نفت برنت : 106 دلار قیمت درهم: 74,171 هزار تومان قیمت نقره: 461 هزار تومان طلای ۱۸ عیار : 25,5 میلیون تومان قیمت سکه امامی : 261 میلیون تومان انس طلا : 3,911 دلار انس نقره : 49,1 دلار بیت کوین: 76,8 بورس: 7,828,000 📲 @imtiaz_capital
از امروز بهجای مقایسه نتیجه خودت با دیگران، پیشرفت خودت رو اندازه بگیر. مثلاً از خودت بپرس: • نسبت به ماه قبل چه چیزی بیشتر یاد گرفتم؟ • کدوم اشتباهم رو کمتر تکرار میکنم؟ • آیا تصمیمهام منطقیتر شدن؟ گاهی پیشرفت واقعی، قبل از اینکه توی حساب بانکی دیده بشه، توی رفتار و تصمیمگیری ما اتفاق میافته.
👍3
ما معمولاً بهترین لحظات زندگی بقیه رو میبینیم، نه تمام مسیرشون رو! وقتی کسی از سودش صحبت میکنه، معمولاً از ضررها، اشتباهات، روزهای ناامیدی و زمانی که برای یادگیری گذاشته حرفی نمیزنه. برای همین ممکنه فکر کنیم همه دارن جلو میرن و فقط ما متوقف شدیم. درحالیکه داریم پشتصحنه زندگی خودمون رو با ویترین زندگی دیگران مقایسه میکنیم.
تا حالا شده سود یه نفر رو ببینی و با خودت بگی: «پس چرا من هنوز نتونستم به این نتیجه برسم؟»
- خیلی زیاد54%
- گاهی این حس رو دارم15%
- بهم انگیزه میده8%
- خودمو با کسی مقایسه نمیکنم23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📍آخرین نرخ ها ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۱ قیمت دلار : 273 هزار تومان قیمت تتر : 272 هزار تومان قیمت یورو : 303 هزار تومان نفت برنت : 113 دلار قیمت درهم: 73,927 هزار تومان قیمت نقره: 459 هزار تومان طلای ۱۸ عیار : 25,6 میلیون تومان قیمت سکه امامی : 262 میلیون تومان انس طلا : 3,906 دلار انس نقره : 50,3 دلار بیت کوین: 78,1 بورس: 7,640,000 📲 @imtiaz_capital
🔺️ ادعاهای جدید ترامپ درباره توافق با ایران رئیس جمهور آمریکا مدعی شد: 🔹️ روند مذاکرات در حال حاضر به خوبی پیش میرود، اما مشکل اصلی این است که طرف ایرانی چندان قابل اعتماد نیست. 🔹️ ایرانیها توافق میکنند و سپس به راحتی زیرِ تعهدات خود میزنند و از آن عقبنشینی میکنند.
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @imtiaz_capital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 9 posts on @imtiaz_capital as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 2 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 44 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تا حالا شده سود یه نفر رو ببینی و با خودت بگی: «پس چرا من هنوز نتونستم به این نتیجه برسم؟»
- خیلی زیاد54%
- گاهی این حس رو دارم15%
- بهم انگیزه میده8%
- خودمو با کسی مقایسه نمیکنم23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تا حالا شده بعد از یه ضرر، حتی وقتی دیگه معاملهای نداری، ذهنت همچنان درگیر اون معامله باشه؟
- آره، ساعتها بهش فکر میکنم50%
- مدام حساب میکنم چقدر پول از دست دادم10%
- دنبال فرصتی برای جبران میگردم20%
- سریع میپذیرم و ادامه میدم20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگر قرار باشه یک بخش از اتاق سیگنال رو بیشتر دنبال کنید، کدومه؟
- سیگنالهای اونس38%
- مدیریت معاملات باز24%
- تحلیل طلا و دلار38%
- روانشناسی و مدیریت سرمایه14%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
راستشو بگو 👇 بیشتر مشکل کدوم بخش رو داری؟
- آموزش زیاد میبینم ولی اجرا نمیکنم31%
- تحلیل میکنم ولی برای ورود مطمئن نیستم11%
- زیاد وارد معامله میشم9%
- هنوز نمیدونم از کجا شروع کنم49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
وقتی یه تحلیل خوب پیدا میکنی، بیشتر کدوم قسمت برات سخته؟
- پیدا کردن نقطه ورود47%
- تعیین حد ضرر11%
- تعیین حجم معامله21%
- صبر کردن برای اجرای پلن42%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگه یه معامله خیلی خوب جلو بره، کدوم کار برات سختتره؟
- زود سود نگیرم37%
- طمع نکنم37%
- حجم اضافه نکنم11%
- دست به معامله نزنم26%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rezagolshaniinvest · 44,020
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@Mahanteymouri_hooshemali · 90,436
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@akhabare_mohemm · 64,359
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“imtiaz capital امتیاز” (@imtiaz_capital), 16,623 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imtiaz_capital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.