IM系统短信嘎嘎发射🚀🚀🚀,直接后台看报告 坐等客源进线😂😂😂 Sending large batches of iMessage messages, with automatic backend statistics and reports, just wait for customer inquiries. 即装即用|免费更新升级|一对一教学 一手卡商/邮箱/ID商都可找我合作 联系认准指定客服:@imqf888

Channel
iMessage群发|苹果推群发系统|iM群发软件|ID协议注册机|RCS群发系统
@imqfxt888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,455subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002284107764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imqfxt888 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imqfxt888 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 4,455 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 4,468 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.4%
- avg views ÷ 4,455 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 August 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,731 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 25s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💋 机房老板的系统不断批量上号,即将开始大量发送IM推信🔥 搞起😀 Customers' IM system is logging in with IDs in bulk, preparing to send a large number of iMessage text messages.😊 😀😀 🎰💯✅ 😀😀 ❤️😇 🔖 搭建专属机房 · 数据不泄露 · 量足成本低 📱 安装认准指定客服:@imqf888
😀😀😀😀 老板考察iM群发系统过后安排搭建 🤜🤛 感谢信任和支持! After experiencing our iM SMS sending software, the customer made a purchase decision without hesitation✅ 📞 发信机房搭建请认准我们:@imqf888
🟥😀😀 老板小机房搭建IM系统现在批量上号准备发信💬 The boss has already installed our IM sending software and is now starting to log in to ID accounts in bulk to prepare for sending SMS messages.🆕 💯 机房搭建认准:@imqf888【一定发】
😀😀 😀😀 搭建iM系统短信嘎嘎发射,直接后台看数据报表!坐等进线😀 Continuously sending iMessages—this client has already sent nearly 100,000 messages. ⚠️ 新手老手均可快速上手 ⚠️ 全套发信方案快速普及 ➡️安装认准客服:@imqf888
😃😃‼️ 老板远程体验后安排一套iMessage群发系统 After experiencing our iMessage sending software through remote desktop, the boss readily purchased a software system 🔥 一对一专群教学服务 🔥 全套发信方案及渠道共享 💯 安装认准指定客服:@imqf888
😀🐞😀😀 协议上百线程同时批量注册ID,嘎嘎出号! Automatically register ID software, quickly create ID accounts in bulk 😀😀 开户即用联系:@imqf888
❤️😇🆕 老板搭建的iM机房开工了,嘎嘎发射🚀👏 Customers are now using our iMessage messaging system to send IM messages in bulk.👛 📞发信机房搭建认准:@imqf888
❌市面上购买的ID质量就是差到离谱!可能还会连设备都被封禁!✔️所以我们才需要自己搭建注册机批量产ID!这样不仅节省成本,ID质量还会非常稳。 ❌The quality of IDs purchased from the market is ridiculously poor! They might even get your devices banned! ✔️That's why we need to build our own registration generator to mass-produce IDs! This not only saves costs, but also ensures very stable ID quality. ✔️一手开发团队 ✔️认准我们指定客服:@imqf888
😀😀 😀😀 打精聊的老板搭建IM群发系统机房发信开工🫸 The boss installed our IM messaging system and is now sending IM messages. 😀😀😀安装系统联系:@imqf888
🌎 超长文案直接用我们iM系统群发秒送达,手机直接叮叮响《实拍实发》 Regardless of the content, our iM SMS sending system ensures instant delivery of messages to the recipient, with a direct pop-up notification on their phone Welcome to contact customer service for system installation 欢迎联系客服安装系统: ✈️ @imqf888
😀😀 给老板讲解iMessage群发系统批量发送美区短信,消息落地对方秒回复😀 系统安装即用 认准指定客服:@imqf888
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @imqfxt888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,269,123 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iMessage群发|苹果推群发系统|iM群发软件|ID协议注册机|RCS群发系统” (@imqfxt888), 4,455 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imqfxt888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.