Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ДВА ПАРНЯ НА «А»

@impragod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,921subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441868387
TypeChannel
Username@impragod
Created18 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/impragod

Growth

2,9212,9352,9286 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,934 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,921 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,919–2,937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:582,921-6
9 Aug 2026, 16:212,927-7
6 Aug 2026, 16:002,934-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,935no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:572,935first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 13s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

661 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545842205757646025937356.4%
🔥13520.4%
🥰11617.5%
custom 5458733391165810569284.24%
👏91.36%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 661reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Feb 2026, 18:19 UTC993 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soonwillbesoonVideo

Вот они и никто больше❤️‍🩹. тт

🔥41🥰22👏3

28 Jan 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,300 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @matgiperficsovVideo

это так прекрасно, что у меня просто нет слов 💕 видео

🥰50🔥3

19 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,360 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Имроком делится 🥹

🔥49🥰7👏2

9 Jan 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,330 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

как же я люблю эти моменты в импровлогах из минивэнов, на которых они обычно передвигаются на гастролях 🤌🏻

custom 545842205757646025953

9 Jan 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,040 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

продолжаю нарезки ❤️ [ часть 5, #архив ]

custom 545873339116581056922custom 54584220575764602599

9 Jan 2026, 12:45 UTC992 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О, этот видос тогда так мощно залетел. Мне кажется, 50% людей пришли на канал после этого видео. Одна из частей! p.s Музыка везде бомба, конечно😂

custom 545842205757646025923

9 Jan 2026, 12:43 UTC969 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

сначала пересмотрите видос, потом голосуйте)) все станет очевидно 😹

custom 545842205757646025931custom 54587333911658105696

9 Jan 2026, 12:42 UTC733 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. Да90%
  2. Не10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54584220575764602599

9 Jan 2026, 12:41 UTC741 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, идея бомба! Делаем?

🔥18custom 54584220575764602596🥰5

9 Jan 2026, 12:41 UTC755 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

предлагаю в канале устроить постоянную рубрику) выкладывать и обсуждать все, как будто мы в той эпохе🥺 благодаря вашему каналу, я третий день пересматриваю эдиты и листаю инстаграм в самый низ, чтоб погрузиться в это все

🥰14👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @impragod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jan 2026, 12:42 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

?

  1. Да90%
  2. Не10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 5 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,360,460 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДВА ПАРНЯ НА «А»” (@impragod), 2,921 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impragod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.