Channel
@impoisoned
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54,722subscribers
-953 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001350848773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @impoisoned |
| Description | универмаг украшений Poison Drop задать вопрос – @PoisonHelpBot проголосовать за канал: https://t.me/boost/impoisoned сайт: https://bit.ly/3GFcGFL реферальная программа: http://bit.ly/3I4pdZn регистрация в реестре РКН: https://clck.ru/3NRDYY |
| Created | 22 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/impoisoned |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 54,722 | -89 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 54,811 | -129 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 54,940 | -193 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 55,133 | -217 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 55,350 | -262 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 55,612 | -140 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 55,752 | +77 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 55,675 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 55,675 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 166,130 |
| Reactions total | 3,433 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,136 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 829 | 38.8% | |
| custom 5435900245508649674 | 513 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5451676918812277386 | 416 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5454176190346586812 | 192 | 8.99% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5434034726463631176 | 49 | 2.29% | |
| 💅 | 46 | 2.15% | |
| 💔 | 34 | 1.59% | |
| 😎 | 7 | 0.328% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,433reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
back in stock: Lalique Дизайн культовых колец-кабошонов был спроектирован Рене Лаликом в 1931 году, и с тех пор не менялся. Рецепт знаменитого опалесцентного стекла все еще «секрет фирмы», но новые цвета украшений мы больше не можем скрывать.
❤47💅17custom 543590024550864967410custom 54516769188122773863💔2custom 54340347264636311762
Posted without readable text
❤28💔12custom 54516769188122773867
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 543590024550864967435❤24😁11
Нас тоже устраивает, как мы выглядим в украшениях GOSHA KARTSEV.
😁21custom 543590024550864967411💔9❤1custom 54541761903465868121
Бриллианты убили поэзию? #тикторник До 18 века самым популярным помолвочным кольцом было не бриллиантовое, а posy-ring (от фр. poésie – «поэзия») – рассказала блогер tinyrainboot. На кольцах делали гравировку с личными подписями – сначала на внешней стороне, а позже стали прятать внутри. У ювелиров даже были сборники с готовыми фразами, как каталог эскизов у тату-мастеров. 🤌 – бриллиант всему голова ❤️ – предпочту…
❤59custom 543590024550864967416custom 54516769188122773869custom 54541761903465868121
P.S. А еще парные украшения для хвостатых и их хозяев 🤫
❤45😁12custom 54359002455086496747custom 54516769188122773864
У Poison Drop вышла коллекция украшений для пушистиков. Рич уже свою получил 🐾
❤76custom 543403472646363117624custom 543590024550864967412
Как называется длинное колье до пояса и ниже? Правильный ответ – сотуар (с фр. – «носить через плечо»). Надевать его можно поверх и даже вместо одежды, но мы советуем вдохновиться на стилизацию у икон эпохи ар-деко, благодаря которым украшение и получило популярность. ❤️/💔?
❤60custom 545167691881227738614custom 54359002455086496747
самые-самые Маша, управляющая Poison Drop на Патриарших, провела нам мини-экскурсию по флагману. А вот и самое… 0:01 – роскошное 0:13 – непохожее на украшение 0:22 – универсальное 0:33 – популярное 0:47 – желанное 🖤 – ждите в гости
❤55custom 545167691881227738623custom 543590024550864967415
скидки до 30% Украшения для долгожданного отпуска, спонтанных вечерних встреч и тех дней, когда из-за жары не хочется надевать вообще ничего.
❤51custom 545167691881227738617custom 54541761903465868128custom 54340347264636311761
Еще успеваете следить за новостями про Зендею и Тома Холланда? Вот новая: пару заметили во время прогулки с обручальными кольцами. Кажется, слухи о секретной свадебной церемонии 4 августа находят свое подтверждение 👀
❤120custom 543590024550864967436custom 545417619034658681221
Собрались с друзьями-стилистами в нашем флагмане на Патриарших – примеряли украшения, сделали на них гравировку с личными символами, угощались игристым Bruni от SimpleWine. Креаторы и стилисты, присоединяйтесь к нашей реферальной программе – создавайте контент для Poison Drop в своем аккаунте, делитесь промокодом с клиентами и получайте баллы на покупки.
❤49custom 545167691881227738617💔11custom 54359002455086496743
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @impoisoned. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 31,412 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Poison Drop” (@impoisoned), 54,722 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impoisoned.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.