Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Foxglove.
@imonparadise
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001416620003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imonparadise |
| Description | 📁 = @Mounarchives 📞 = @Nnarayourbot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imonparadise |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 1 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
📝 Tbh Nara itu... ᨦ🌷f⍶ɩ𝗋𝘆 𝗞αlᧉyzʜ𐐼 𓄹 !? @KaleyzhaRpw: Cantikk Captain, Rajena.: Pretty sascana @yerimskimv: cantik briel: 🪄. pretty ansel isn't reply.: CANTIKK AND CUTE TOO 💞💞 Superhero, Aaron..♡ @aSunshiene: super duper cantik and humble betul jayden @urlocalmorkli: humble myb Seaa: Cutee shanaya intipdr: cantikkk Jarel @jaystprk: cwk haekal @pLeechanhae: cewek 👍 raka vogos @iMarkLocal: pretty Chandra A…
Sticker, posted without a caption
@donediving aku pake bracket (🎐⨾ ) or ( #Naraia ) di board anonymous, jika merasa aku belum mengisi board kamu bisa kirim link bbc board ch kamu ke @Nnrayourbot langsung kirim aja Ooke
Oke aku ngerti pasti ada yang limit/rest tapi ga mungkin hampir semuanya kan?
Sisanya pada kemana?
tiap hari aku diving 100+ ch, itu juga aktif semua tapi kenapa rata-rata feedback yang aku dapat cuma nyampe 30-50 an?
📝 Ketik "Nara pacar haechan" untuk absen hari ini Yang bener ya briel: #BRL nara pacar haechan Seaa: Nara pacar haechan abigail @ljunqeunha: nara pacar haechan dir. 놋쇠! Teemothe: Nara pacar haechan 𝐓he ℘rettiest, Assa! @xyzasa: #𝓐ssaa Nara pacar haechan Georleya D'Calypso @iLoubeJeno: nara pacar haechan tp boong patra @haegcham: nara pcr haechan kaleyzha, tawan gf 🦸🏻♀️: nara pcr ecan Djof suka bini pak Joko…
Sticker, posted without a caption
📝 About me pt 2 👤 ꣸֗🌺᩼⑅ Ᏹ֗. cantik 👤 #hswu pretty n terlihat agak cerewet 👤 🪄. cool amd ofc pretty 👤 🎐` Pretty gurl ! 👤 pretty and cool 👤 #티모떼. Definitely an easy going person! 👤 𖥻ℒ𝗩ꢭׄ. seems friendly, pretty 👤 ⩩ᧁᦔᥴ. humble, easy going, talkactive?! AW POKOKNYA KM KIYOWOK 👤 #ptra so pretty & talkactive 👤 ៹𖤐. PRETTY ! 👤 🦦. anak ayah cantik & lucu poll 👤 pretty gurl 👤 #faith gorgeous 👤 #𝐉.🎸pretty 👤 #kmrk…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Which is the type of me !?!!
- you are a 🅒︎🅤︎🅣︎🅔︎ little bunny🐰🔮,i want pinch your chubby 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘴🤏63%
- A sosial butterfly 🦋🦋, friendly, easy going and lovely person. Always give positive vibes 🎀🧚♀.23%
- You're so annoying, intimidating sshH 🥶 hard to approach her. I'm scared of you☠☠.3%
- 𝗶𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗼𝘆! i woaffs you so much because you are a vewyy bwewyy prettie👩🍳🤍!5%
- eww! you so ugly,just leave me alone such a ugly girliee 😾🧟♀6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @imonparadise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which is the type of me !?!!
- you are a 🅒︎🅤︎🅣︎🅔︎ little bunny🐰🔮,i want pinch your chubby 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘴🤏63%
- A sosial butterfly 🦋🦋, friendly, easy going and lovely person. Always give positive vibes 🎀🧚♀.23%
- You're so annoying, intimidating sshH 🥶 hard to approach her. I'm scared of you☠☠.3%
- 𝗶𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗼𝘆! i woaffs you so much because you are a vewyy bwewyy prettie👩🍳🤍!5%
- eww! you so ugly,just leave me alone such a ugly girliee 😾🧟♀6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2022 to 28 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 28
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 28
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@imonparadise named 28 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Foxglove.” (@imonparadise), 1 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imonparadise.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.