Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Управление оперативных мероприятий инспекции МНС по г. Минску

Channel

Управление оперативных мероприятий инспекции МНС по г. Минску

@imnsrb_minsk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,494subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001273376756
TypeChannel
Username@imnsrb_minsk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/imnsrb_minsk

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,49414,52614,5107 August 2026 — 14,525 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,524 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,521 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,517 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,516 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,517 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,526 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,525 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,520 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,524 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,526 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,520 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,519 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,520 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,523 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,522 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,518 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,515 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,512 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,509 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,508 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,512 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,506 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,507 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,505 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,506 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,504 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,494 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,489–14,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1914,494-10
15 Sept 2026, 15:5714,504-2
13 Sept 2026, 20:5914,506+1
12 Sept 2026, 06:3914,505-2
10 Sept 2026, 02:3714,507+1
6 Sept 2026, 21:1714,506-6
4 Sept 2026, 09:5514,512+4
2 Sept 2026, 22:1614,508-1
1 Sept 2026, 18:0914,509-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:2814,512-3
30 Aug 2026, 22:1814,515-3
29 Aug 2026, 20:2614,518-4
27 Aug 2026, 19:5314,522-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:3414,523+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:5414,520+1
23 Aug 2026, 07:5314,519-1
21 Aug 2026, 18:5814,520-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:0714,521-5
19 Aug 2026, 17:5314,526+2
18 Aug 2026, 16:4814,524first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 14,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,370
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (18 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total19,100
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC≈3,760 viewsread 2 September 2026

Подведены итоги визита к забывчивому предпринимателю Да, про налоги предприниматель не вспоминал в течение более чем 3-х лет. За это время размер выручки, «заботливо» скрытой от налогообложения, подобрался к 15 миллионам рублей. В оправдание бизнесмен лишь сказал: «Я думал, что этим занимается бухгалтер», но примечателен факт, что тот самый бухгалтер покинул страну, как раз несколько лет назад. Интересно, знает ли о

28 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈8,000 viewsread 2 September 2026

Поехали за знаниями! Последние дни августа наполнены приятными хлопотами: школьники вместе с родителями готовятся к новому учебному году, выбирают форму, рюкзаки и необходимые принадлежности. Совсем скоро наступит 1 сентября — день новых встреч, знаний и открытий. В преддверии этого важного события для пассажиров с детьми wb такси был подготовлен приятный сюрприз, который подарил семьям хорошее настроение и добавил

18 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈8,970 viewsread 2 September 2026

Многолетние нарушения при торговле мобильными телефонами Сотрудники 1-го и 3-го отделов управления провели оперативные мероприятия в 2 торговых объектах, специализирующихся на реализации мобильных телефонов, чехлов и аксессуаров к ним. Индивидуальный предприниматель, осуществляющий деятельность на территории столицы с 2021 года, систематически игнорировал требования законодательства, собрав целый букет нарушений: •

11 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈9,740 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Онлайн новость Сегодня управление в полном составе решило проверить индивидуального предпринимателя, торгующего напольными покрытиями. Поводом для визита послужило то обстоятельство, что ИП длительное время торговал плиткой, но налоги, видимо, откладывал «на потом». Похоже, главным для бизнесмена было, чтобы плитка была без сколов и трещин, но насколько прочен налоговый фундамент, его не заботило. Пока устанавлива

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Что можно сказать, глядя на фотографии – управление проверило зоомагазин? Нет, так оформлен интерьер для привлечения посетителей в одном из столичных рестобаров. Необычно, но только, похоже, всё внимание рестораторов отвлёк внешний лоск, и о требовании законодательства о наличии документов на алкогольную и табачную продукцию они подзабыли, как в прочем и о необходимости получить лицензию на их продажу. Что ж нелега

4 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 2 September 2026

Не знаем, где руководство этого магазина подсмотрело схему ухода от налогообложения, но налоги - не та тема, где стоит учиться по советам из чатов 👀 Для этого есть журнал «Налоги Беларуси» - официальный журнал по налогам в Республике Беларусь. Там разбирают изменения законодательства, практику применения налоговых норм, актуальные вопросы плательщиков и позицию специалистов. Потому что “мне в чате написали” - не а

4 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈8,480 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Онлайн-новость Сегодня сборная команда третьего и первого отделов управления проводят контрольные мероприятия в магазине по продаже товаров для винокурения и пивоварения. Основанием послужило обращение гражданина о том, что в магазине выдают «липовые» чеки, распечатанные на принтере. Уже понятно, что заявитель не ошибся, но насколько «хмельные» ингредиенты вскружили голову руководству магазина будем выяснять.

3 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈7,770 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Онлайн-новость Очередной салон красоты попал под пристальное внимание первого оперативного отдела управления. Причина нашего визита – нежелание бизнесменов показать реально полученные доходы. В настоящее время проводятся мероприятия по установлению размера сокрытой от налогообложения выручки.

30 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈9,700 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Стоит ли пускать свое дело по течению Подведены итоги контрольного мероприятия, проведённого первым оперативным отделом в отношении ООО «М», торгующего живыми цветами, подарками, и они неутешительны для руководства организации – порядка 176 тыс. руб. выручки сокрыто от налогообложения за менее чем 3 года. Сумма в целом не поражает воображение, но для небольшого магазина с годовой выручкой порядка 100 тыс. руб. это

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @imnsrb_minsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Realt
@realtbyofficial · 34,191
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Myfin.by
@myfin_news · 27,599
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Мерзкий Кокобай
@koko_by · 110,998
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
МАРТ
@mart_gov_by · 23,229
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
ЧП Беларусь 🚨 Будь в курсе
@cpbelarus · 51,781
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Следственный комитет Беларуси
@skgovby · 30,373
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Литовская о жилье
@Litovskaya_o_zhilje · 27,542
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Управление оперативных мероприятий инспекции МНС по г. Минску” (@imnsrb_minsk), 14,494 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imnsrb_minsk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.