Channel
@imnanews_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,372subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001073113824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imnanews_ir |
| Created | 4 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imnanews_ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 3,372 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3,380 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 3,383 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 3,387 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,388 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 3,388 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,294 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 10 | 52.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 مهمترین خبرهای امروز ایمنا 🔻سران عربستان، ترکیه و پاکستان توافقنامه دفاعی امضا کردند 🔻درخشش جوانان ایران در المپیاد جهانی هوش مصنوعی 🔻وزارت خارجه آمریکا از وضع تحریمهای جدید علیه ایران خبر داد 🔻یحیی سریع: مواضع نظامیان سعودی را هدف قرار دادیم 🔻 پزشکیان: هرگز استعفا ندادهام و نخواهم داد 📱مشاهده ایمنا در فضای مجازی
🎥 پزشکیان: کسانی که بدون داده یا با اطلاعات ناقص نسخه میپیچند، جامعه را به انحراف میبرند. 🔹عدهای برای جامعهای به این پیچیدگی، درباره اقتصاد، سیاست، جامعهشناسی و کشاورزی همزمان نظر میدهند و راهحل ارائه میکنند؛ این علم را از کجا آوردهاند؟ 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: با گفتوگو توانستیم جنگ لبنان را متوقف کنیم، محاصره را برداریم و برخی تحریمها را کاهش دهیم. 🔹عدهای میخواهند بجنگیم؛ همان چیزی که اسرائیل میخواهد تا ما را وادار به تسلیم کند. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: کلیات توافق نهایی شده بود و برای افزایش اعتبار آن، قرار بود امضای نهایی از سوی ترامپ انجام شود تا امکان عقبنشینی از توافق وجود نداشته باشد. 🔹اما کمتر از ۲۴ ساعت بعد، روند مذاکرات بهطور کامل تغییر کرد و توافق به سرانجام نرسید. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: از قالیباف خواهش کردیم که رئیس تیم مذاکرهکننده شود 🔹همکاری و هماهنگی میان دولت، مجلس، قوه قضائیه و نیروهای مسلح، عامل اصلی عبور از شرایط سخت بوده است. 🔹بیاحترامی و تفرقه، خواستۀ دشمن است و باید با همدلی و احترام با یکدیگر رفتار کنیم. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: هرگز استعفا ندادهام و نخواهم داد 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: هیچ دولتی به اندازۀ ما در جهت سیاستهای رهبری قدم برنداشت 🔹اینکه عدهای اختلافسازی کنند و القا کنند رهبری چیزی میگویند و دولت چیز دیگری، هم در حق رهبری جفاست و هم در حق دولت. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: تفاهمنامه آتشبس با هماهنگی، تفاهم و همدلی در شورای امنیت ملی شکل گرفته است 🔹ما با نیروهای نظامی کاملاً هماهنگ هستیم و پشتیبانی از آنان را وظیفه خود میدانیم. 🔹کسانی که جانشان را کف دست گرفتهاند و از این کشور دفاع میکنند، مگر ممکن است میان ما و آنها اختلافی باشد؟ 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: آمریکا از سرزمین کشورهای منطقه به ما حمله میکند و ما باید از خود دفاع کنیم 🔹مبدأ حمله به مدرسۀ میناب یکی از کشورهای مسلمان بود. 🔹دشمن از پایگاههای آمریکا در برخی کشورهای منطقه علیه ایران استفاده کرد و ایران ناچار به دفاع از خود شد. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
🎥 پزشکیان: هیچ امتیازی در تفاهمنامه ندادیم 🔹میگویند آمریکا به تعهداتش عمل نمیکند؛ تا جایی که آنها عمل کنند، ما نیز عمل میکنیم. آنچه به دست آوردیم امتیاز بود؛ اینکه آمریکا از محاصره کنار کشید، به معنای امتیاز دادن ما نبود. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: ایران آغازگر جنگ نبود و همراهی مردم، محاسبات دشمن برای فروپاشی کشور را برهم زد. 🔹امروز ایران با قدرت و انسجام بیشتری مسیر خود را ادامه میدهد؛ دشمن روی فروپاشی کشور حساب کرده بود، اما ناکام ماند 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
🎥 زیر بار زور نمیرویم، اما بهدنبال جنگ و تجاوز هم نیستیم 🔹ایران بهدنبال جنگ یا توسعهطلبی نیست و تنها از توان دفاعی و امنیت خود حفاظت میکند؛ اگر فشار و تهدید علیه ایران متوقف شود، دلیلی برای ادامه تنش وجود نخواهد داشت. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @imnanews_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 179,801 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگزاری ایمنا” (@imnanews_ir), 3,372 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imnanews_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.