welp, looks like we just crossed the point of no return with video generation models. I genuinely couldn’t find a single sign it was all AI. something something it’s so over
🤯3🔥2

Channel
@imkonavenue
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
152subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266307323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imkonavenue |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imkonavenue |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 152 | +1 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 151 | +12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 139 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:43 | 138 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 137 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 138 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 140 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 46.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 16.0% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2023 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
welp, looks like we just crossed the point of no return with video generation models. I genuinely couldn’t find a single sign it was all AI. something something it’s so over
🤯3🔥2
pilaf-maxxing at an openai event "sir we're reaching levels of ням-ням we never thought possible"
❤2🔥1😭1
If you need movie recs for tonight, here are two: 1. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004). “Joel and Clementine undergo a procedure to erase each other from their memories after a painful breakup, only for Joel to realize he wants to keep the memories as they fade.” A beautiful movie; watched it on my flight with Turkish Airlines recently. 2. Cosmic Princess Kaguya! (2026) “The story follows high school …
🔥3❤2
Instagram must have the most vile moderation ever. Whenever I'm back in Uzbekistan, I get tons of AI-slop scam ads posted by no-name farmed bots. It never happens when I'm abroad, which leads me to believe they specifically target users in our country. Every time I see one, I report it, hoping there will less disgusting garbage out there and that at least someone will be saved from those scams. Lo and behold, NOT …
❤5💯3
There is a clear lack of “gateway” literature for secondary school students in Uzbekistan: the kind of books that ease teenagers into the habit of reading. If you think about it, there’s a huge selection of highly illustrated, simple books for elementary school students, and then suddenly a jump to 300+ page, text-only books meant for adults. That gap is one of the main reasons so many people lose interest in readin…
❤4💯1
just saw this on twitter. written by ai but definitely worth the read. lmk what you think 👍 / 👎 credit (the text version is in the comments)
❤5👍2
hey, folks. it's truly been a minute ;) you might be wondering why this inactive channel suddenly got defibbed on the New Year's Eve. i'm sure OGs can already tell who is behind the keyboard right now, but if you're new here: hello and nice to meet you. the reason i'm back is because nostalgia's been hitting hard lately, and today i finally decided to just f-it-we-ball. it was also sad seeing this place and its awe…
❤5👍1
Studienkollegs in Germany with their deadlines. *there was a mistake with Goethe universität: deadline is already passed
Signed Azizbek Ochilov
i went through all top-1000 Korean universities and these are the ones which you can still apply to. please, check their requirements yourself. you can acces this document using this link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gNP2sHzQhG_m3NPbA7mWavO7S0Yyd4Reb0pzg5OzZY8/edit?usp=sharing also, if you wanna research more, you can use bachelorsportal.com (or mastersportal.com), can be useful @imkonavenue
Signed Azizbek Ochilov
well, yeah, i totally forgot about that post. right now i'm on a 8-hour trip, so i will have some time, first will send deadlines of Korean universities. (there are 41 of them in top-1000). stay tuned.
Signed Azizbek Ochilov
hi, guys. it is already June and deadlines at most universities already passed. so I want to make a list of unis you can still apply to. which country/continent do you want the list to be based on?
Signed Azizbek Ochilov
Paper-based SAT vs Digital SAT Well, since all international test centers made full transition to digital SAT, there are some things you should know about: What remains the same as the old paper-based test: • The digital SAT uses the same score scale of 400-1600 as the old, paper test. • Like the paper test, the digital SAT will be administered only in schools and designated testing centers. What will change with …
Signed Azizbek Ochilov
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @imkonavenue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Imkon Avenue” (@imkonavenue), 152 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imkonavenue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.