Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ٬ 𝗂𝗆𝗁𝗈 — 𝗄𝗉𝗈𝗉.𝗏𝖾𝗋 ֪ ׁ ꕊ‌

Channel

٬ 𝗂𝗆𝗁𝗈 — 𝗄𝗉𝗈𝗉.𝗏𝖾𝗋 ֪ ׁ ꕊ‌

@imho_kpop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

3,425subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002064375774
TypeChannel
Username@imho_kpop
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imho_kpop

Growth

3,4253,5433,48411 August 2026 — 3,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,541 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,509 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,486 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,467 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,437 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,425 subscribers11 August 202628 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 17 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,407–3,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:243,425-12
24 Aug 2026, 22:063,437-30
21 Aug 2026, 10:033,467-19
18 Aug 2026, 18:223,486-23
15 Aug 2026, 12:153,509-32
11 Aug 2026, 16:023,541-2
11 Aug 2026, 11:013,543no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:513,543first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.23%
avg views ÷ 3,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
282
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (4 August 20264 August 2026)
Views total4,511
Reactions total399
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

399 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22957.4%
💯5614.0%
🤣4411.0%
🤝266.52%
🤨246.02%
🗿194.76%
🤔10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC418 views50 reactionsread 11 August 2026

SWEAT КИОФ ЭТО ТО, ЧЕГО МНЕ НЕ ХВАТАЛО ВСЕ ЭТО ЛЕТО, ЭТО НЕРЕАЛЬНО 🙏🙏🙏🙏

38💯7🤣4🗿1

4 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC412 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Короче мне очень серьёзно нужно высказаться касаемо вдохновением Лолитой (фильма) в поп культуре, прощу вас, не пролистывайте, я постараюсь вас не задерживать, быть краткой и понятной. Так вот: Когда артист(я подразумеваю такде режиссёров, художников и других творческих людей) поддерживает образ лолиты из фильма и делает на него отсылки не осуждаюшего контекста это - пдф наклонности и желание получать внимание от ло

25💯2

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC336 views55 reactionsread 11 August 2026

bts устарели

27🤣14💯5🗿5🤝3🤨1

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC331 views37 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Как вам камбэк рв? 10/10, очень понравилась, особенно песня « hawaii” Альбом прям summer vibe

25💯7🤝4🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC303 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Серьёзно? Вы реально сидите и с умным видом пишете, что одна песня BTS в 2016 «закончила карьеру» целой группы? Милые, успех это не пирог, который можно отобрать у кого-то и всё, больше никому не достанется. То, что у ваших любимчиков в какой-то момент случился мощный рост, не превращает другую группу в пыль только потому, что вам так хочется. вам очень нужно кого-то принизить, чтобы собственная гордость чувствовала

💯15🤨6🤝32🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC268 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

я конечно понимаю как приятно когда твой биас бьет рекорды, но когда я увидел этот пост, то было неприятно читать комментарии. бабки арми так обосрали чимина, просто нереально. это было так омерзительно. что с людьми становится не так?

🤨51

4 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC239 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

В 2024 году баннис хейтили айллит за виниры, а сейчас они хейтят нд за тоже самое 😃😃😃😃 я не могу с этого фд, готовы мочить собственную группу лишь бы поднасрать хайбу

12💯3

4 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC278 views48 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Интересно какого щас хайб стэнам, которые говорили, что нд "придумывают проблемы" видеть, как одна за другой их фавка отправляется в рест из-за проблем со здоровьем. Прикольно было высмеивать слезы ханни в национальной ассамблее? (Уже предвещаю ржущие реакции под этим тейком. Ну что ж смейтесь дальше, состояние ваших фавок лишь доказывает, что нд были правы)

🤣23🗿118🤨3💯2🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC278 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

как я себя ощущаю когда хочу поддерживать ньюджинс, но не хочу поддерживать адор: я считаю, что бойкот бесполезен. никакой бойкот, кроме бойкота луна, не продлился больше 3 дней. я хочу, чтобы девочки уже с богом просто закончили карьеру группы и разошлись кто куда. я понимаю, что их новые песни больше не будут попадать в чарты или выигрывать награды, потому что репутация группы уже зарыта. я люблю нд от5, но я прос

14🤨3💯1🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC225 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

от каких групп 5пк и 4 пк по вашему мнению идёт вайб друзей или семьи?

3

4 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC237 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мне смешно с того, что Чимин даже визуально вписывается в эту тусовку

17💯4

4 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC242 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026

очень смешно наблюдать как ведут себя кпоперы когда нугу группа становится популярной. начинают её форсить и делают, вид что знали эту группу за десяток лет до сформирования ( они узнали про нее вчера из тиктока*)

19💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @imho_kpop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“٬ 𝗂𝗆𝗁𝗈 — 𝗄𝗉𝗈𝗉.𝗏𝖾𝗋 ֪ ׁ ꕊ‌” (@imho_kpop), 3,425 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imho_kpop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.