Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

imhlai

@imhlai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,088subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001521648415
TypeChannel
Username@imhlai
Descriptionلینک ناشناس ِ من: t.me/safeCht_bot?start=sf_0395736e چنل موزیک: @imhlaiplaylist
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imhlai

Growth

11,05511,08811,071.514 Aug 2026, 09:04 — 11,055 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 09:15 — 11,055 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 16:12 — 11,088 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 09:0415 Aug 2026, 16:12
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,050–11,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:1211,088+33
14 Aug 2026, 09:1511,055no change
14 Aug 2026, 09:0411,055first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 11,088 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held58 (13 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total80,955
Reactions total1,203
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
506
Videos
62
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,203 reactions across 43 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42034.9%
😭25020.8%
🤣17414.5%
🍓15613.0%
👌725.99%
👀362.99%
💔312.58%
🤝191.58%
❤‍🔥151.25%
💘151.25%
💋120.998%
🔥20.166%
🤗10.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,160 views113 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Lilies ☺️

🍓103💋4🔥21💘1🤗1😭1

15 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈1,410 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تو واقعا محشری دختر لطفا همه تلاشتو بکن که هیچ وقت نمیری 😭😭😭

🤣27👌3😭3

Signed Safe Chat

15 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,430 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026

مهلا واقعا ازت ممنونم :) خیلی ممنونم که اهمیت دادی بهم و گفتی بوس بهت💋♥️ قضیه ی پرش فکری هم بامزه ست منم دارم و اصلا از نظر من رو مخ نیست💋

7

Signed Safe Chat

15 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,380 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥14💋4

15 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,360 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

15🍓4🤣2

15 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,330 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

13🍓4

15 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,270 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

13🍓4🤝1

15 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,260 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

14🍓4🤣1

15 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,250 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

مهلا راستش من کنکوری ام و این هفته کنکور میدم میشه لطفا بزاری ؟ من خیلی این چند روز نیاز به آرامش دارم:)

4

Signed Safe Chat

15 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 15 August 2026

یکی از برنامه هام این بود یه روز بهت پیام بدم ازت بخوام یه کار مشترک کنیم یه کار خیلی خیلی کوچیک چون این مردم نیاز دارن به چند نفر مثل تو که بیان اینقد قشنگ جلو دوربین حرف بزنن و احساساتشون و ترجمه هاشونو بگن و اگه جدی آدمو این کارارو کنن فضای مجازی خیلی مفید تر از چیزی که هست میشه کاش تو و نسل تو ادامه پیدا کنه

Signed Safe Chat

15 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 15 August 2026

https://t.me/imhlai/37503 من همینارو دیدم که اون اولا از بین هزاران ادم فقط چنل تلگرام تورو داشتم فقط تو چون خیلی به دلم نشستی نمیدونم چطور بگم خیلی هم وایبم بودی خوش ذوق و دوست داشتنی و اینو بدون وقتی خودتی ما خیلی بیشتر دوست داریم:))

Signed Safe Chat

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @imhlai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 95,877 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“imhlai” (@imhlai), 11,088 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imhlai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.