Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сеть Пряничных Караганда

Channel

Сеть Пряничных Караганда

@imbirchik09kz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196099317
TypeChannel
Username@imbirchik09kz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/imbirchik09kz

Growth

464746.57 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 12:2846-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:2447first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 16 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2024 to 1 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @imbirchik09kz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Сеть Пряничных Ташкент
@imbirchik01uz · 11
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Алматы
@imbirchik02kz · 39
1 post
Сеть пряничных Кокшетау
@imbirchik03kz · 20
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Обнинск
@imbirchik040 · 34
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Махачкала
@imbirchik05 · 14
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Конаев
@imbirchik05_kz · 10
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Уральск
@imbirchik07kz · 11
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Костанай
@imbirchik10kz · 14
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Сыктывкар
@imbirchik11 · 12
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Кызылорда
@imbirchik11kz · 13
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Котлас
@imbirchik129 · 14
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Валуйки
@imbirchik131 · 13
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Ангарск
@imbirchik138 · 16
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Семей
@imbirchik16kz · 12
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Белоярский
@imbirchik186ru · 13
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Братск
@imbirchik238ru · 16
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Ессентуки
@imbirchik26 · 11
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Иваново
@imbirchik37 · 12
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Иркутск
@imbirchik38 · 33
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Калининград
@imbirchik39ru · 14
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Курган
@imbirchik45 · 15
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Курск
@imbirchik46 · 14
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Уфа
@imbirchik702 · 17
1 post
Сеть Пряничных Москва
@imbirchik777 · 17
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сеть Пряничных Караганда” (@imbirchik09kz), 46 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imbirchik09kz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.