Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мария Райдер 👍 Напиши и издай®

Channel

Мария Райдер 👍 Напиши и издай®

@imariarider

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,261subscribers

+3,006 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001106311398
TypeChannel
Username@imariarider
DescriptionКак написать и издать свою книгу. Советы литературного редактора, которая издала 3000+ книг. #NT66X НАЧНИ ОТСЮДА👇 https://telegram.me/c/1106311398/1970 Все вопросы 👇 https://telegram.me/mariariderpro
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/imariarider

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,25413,6089,4316 August 2026 — 5,255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,254 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,172 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,160 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,608 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,605 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,601 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,593 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,591 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,588 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,583 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,580 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,576 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,573 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,570 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,567 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,564 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,562 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,565 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,561 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,559 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,409 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,407 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,372 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,348 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,243 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,229 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,148 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,041 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,496 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,414 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,379 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,368 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,351 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,332 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,320 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,310 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,296 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,278 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,261 subscribers8,2616 August 202611 November 2026
41 measurements spanning 96 days, net +3,006. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,001–14,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:588,261-17
7 Nov 2026, 07:398,278-18
4 Nov 2026, 10:088,296-14
1 Nov 2026, 12:448,310-10
29 Oct 2026, 07:468,320-12
25 Oct 2026, 20:088,332-19
22 Oct 2026, 11:378,351-17
19 Oct 2026, 06:258,368-11
16 Oct 2026, 01:308,379-35
12 Oct 2026, 23:068,414-2,082
8 Oct 2026, 16:0010,496-2,545
4 Oct 2026, 05:3913,041-107
25 Sept 2026, 12:1813,148-81
18 Sept 2026, 21:3513,229-14
16 Sept 2026, 09:3913,243-105
14 Sept 2026, 17:5513,348-24
13 Sept 2026, 04:5913,372-35
11 Sept 2026, 07:4113,407-2
8 Sept 2026, 10:3813,409-150
5 Sept 2026, 08:0113,559first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.48%
avg views ÷ 8,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held83 (20 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total5,336
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,630
Videos
≈85
Links
≈1,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 34s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

592 reactions across 80 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28548.1%
🔥19232.4%
👍569.46%
🎉518.61%
🙏40.676%
😁20.338%
🤩20.338%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 592 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (19.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

«А на какие книги похожа ваша?» Один из вопросов, который автор может услышать во время питчинга с издательством. И, пожалуй, один из самых неудобных. Особенно если автор уверен, что написал совершенно уникальную книгу, аналогов которой просто не существует. Но почему издатель вообще спрашивает о других книгах, если перед ним представляют новую? Дело в том, что сравнение помогает понять, какому читателю может быть…

❤4🎉2🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

☝️ «Первая книга» – книга с говорящим названием. Можно сказать это пошаговый путеводитель для авторов нон-фикшн, где вы найдете ответы на вопросы: от «Сколько страниц должно быть в книге?» и «Какую поставить стоимость?» – до всех возможных вариантов написания, издания и продвижения книги. Две мои главы внутри – «Пишем с продюсером» и «Пишем с литературным агентством». Где я раскрыла, как мы с командой литературног…

❤2🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Игорь Манн предложил мне написать пару глав для своей новой книги – и я сказала «Да» На днях получила радостную весть: вышла «Первая книга» Игоря Манна, для которой я писала две главы. Мало кто знает, что знакомы мы с Игорем уже лет этак 20, еще со времен основания издательства «Манн, Иванов и Фербер». С тех пор и дружим – 4 раза в год я выступаю в его клубе и регулярно привожу авторов, которые писали книги со мно…

🔥3❤1

11 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC142 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Какую роль играет структура в жизни книги? 🦞 13 ноября в 19:00 мск на мастер-классе «Архитектура книги: от идеи до успешной реализации» покажу, как выстраивать содержание книги под авторский замысел. И разберу примеры из своей издательской практики! Один из них — история Ирины Павловой. Ирина преподает йогу и медитацию, создает образовательные программы. У нее уже были материалы, проверенные на учениках, и большо…

🔥4❤3🎉1

10 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC157 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

21.11▪️Питчинги с Эксмо! Как эксперт «Эксмо» оценивает книжные проекты? У вас будет возможность увидеть это на практике! 🗓 21 ноября 12:00 мск проведем живой эфир с питчингами художественных и нон-фикшн книг. 🎙Четыре автора представят свои проекты Христине Гляцевич — эксперту издательства «Эксмо» по работе с авторами. Каждый получит профессиональную обратную связь, а вы сможете наблюдать за процессом и услышать,…

❤4🔥3

10 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC160 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Только начали новый курс «Как издать свою книгу», а я уже получаю такие сообщения от участников 🔥 У одной из участниц уже складывается понимание, что делать не только с первой рукописью, но и с двумя следующими! И особенно меня радует, что автор не спешит с выбором способа публикации. Пока рассматривает самиздат, но хочет разобраться и в других вариантах, чтобы принять взвешенное решение. Для меня как издателя это…

❤4🎉1

9 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

В какие форматы работы ко мне можно попасть в ноябре? Публикую актуальные варианты, наличие мест и условия можно уточнить через мою помощницу в чате. 📗 Фокус-группа «Напиши и издай» — 240 000 ₽ 3 месяца работы над вашей книгой с моим сопровождением — 12 онлайн-встреч в группе, уроки, задания и поддержка. Будем последовательно работать над рукописью, разбирать возникающие вопросы и готовиться к изданию. Вы сможете…

❤4

8 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC190 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Можно иметь литературный опыт, публиковаться в сборниках, побеждать в конкурсах. И при этом не понимать, с какой стороны подступиться к собственной экспертной книге. Именно с такой задачей ко мне пришла Елена Волкова — психолог, психотерапевт и создательница проекта «Жизнь в плюсе», который поддерживает девушек и женщин плюс-сайз. У Елены уже были художественные рассказы, основанные на историях ее клиенток. Была ид…

❤4🔥3

7 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTC222 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🔰 Сегодня в 16:00 мск проведу первый урок на курсе «Как издать свою книгу». ❗️Участники, которые еще не в чате — проверяйте почту и мессенджеры! Жду вас в чате. Кто не успел, долго думал, не разобрался с оплатой — у вас последний шанс присоединиться. Быстро о важном: 📌 длительность курса — 1 месяц, внутри 4 онлайн-встречи; 📌 можно прийти с любым этапом подготовки книги, даже если у вас только идя и первая глава …

❤3🔥2

6 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⏩ Ваше место ждет вас здесь ⏪ По всем вопросам о курсе пишите в чат моему ассистенту.

❤3

6 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC225 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @imariarider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@imariarider edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @imariarider as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

На каком этапе ваша книга?

  1. Пока выбираю идеи, думаю в этом направлении6%
  2. Тема есть, собираю материал, есть несколько глав31%
  3. Черновик готов, редактирую31%
  4. Рукопись полностью готова, ищу пути издания38%
  5. Книга издана, продвигаю и продаю13%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Что вы пишите или планируете писать?

  1. Экспертная / нон-фикшн книга28%
  2. Художественная61%
  3. Мемуары / личные истории17%
  4. Пока не выбрано направление0%
  5. Нет моего варианта ответа17%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Какой этап подготовки книги вызывает больше всего вопросов?

  1. Выбор темы, идеи и концепции9%
  2. Сбор черновика, архитектура рукописи14%
  3. Дописать рукопись до конца, качество и скорость32%
  4. Издание через самиздат23%
  5. Издание через издательство45%
  6. Поиск и выбор путей издания под свою книгу45%
  7. Продвижение после выхода, поиск читателей55%
  8. Все понятно, но почему-то не дописываю и не издаю5%

The shares total 228%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мария Райдер 👍 Напиши и издай®” (@imariarider), 8,261 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imariarider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.