Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Imaginative Girl 🦢

Channel

Imaginative Girl 🦢

@imaginative_girl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,930subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001294709211
TypeChannel
Username@imaginative_girl
Created4 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/imaginative_girl

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8264,0193,922.56 August 2026 — 3,841 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,841 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,826 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,858 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,855 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,857 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,985 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,019 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,990 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,968 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,956 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,930 subscribers3,9306 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,797–4,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:373,930-26
13 Sept 2026, 14:003,956-12
9 Sept 2026, 16:163,968-22
4 Sept 2026, 14:153,990-29
1 Sept 2026, 00:584,019+34
29 Aug 2026, 06:573,985+128
25 Aug 2026, 23:253,857-15
19 Aug 2026, 12:373,872+17
16 Aug 2026, 05:463,855-3
12 Aug 2026, 13:563,858+32
9 Aug 2026, 21:123,826-15
7 Aug 2026, 05:113,841no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:453,841first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

933 reactions across 22 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25727.5%
👍15917.0%
🤣14215.2%
😢11612.4%
💯798.47%
🔥616.54%
💔252.68%
🤯242.57%
❤‍🔥151.61%
🤷‍♀121.29%
🕊111.18%
😍80.857%
😁60.643%
🙏60.643%
💅40.429%
💘40.429%
😐20.214%
😭20.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imaginative_girl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC478 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Настарин, сен ҳамма гуллардан баландсан, чиройлисан, сени тананг бақувват- сен кучлисан! Фақат...одамлар сени бор пайтинг қадрлашмайди, сен ҳеч кимга ўхшамайсан, сен ягонасан, аммо фақат баҳор фаслида очиласан ва жудаям оз яшайсан... @imaginative_girl

21❤‍🔥4🕊4

6 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC774 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Шундай... @imaginative_girl

24👍14🕊4🔥2❤‍🔥1💯1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC974 views137 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Бувим жони узилаётган пайтда ҳам ўзини эмас, бошқаларни ўйлади. Оғзига тутилаётган "зам-зам" сувни ҳам "Қолганини сизлар ичинглар, жуда кўп у сув дерди ҳиқиллаб... Жон ҳалқумга келиб, 2 марта қайтганда кетаётганини аниқ билиб, насиҳат ва васиятни тезда айтиб, бутун бошли ўзидан қолаётган авлодини бирма-бир исмини айтиб, ҳар бирини эҳтиежини айтиб, камига ҳар бирининг ҳаётий муаммоларини ҳам билар экан, ҳаммасига ечим

72😢44💔11🙏6👍2💅2

5 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,030 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Агар мен 80 ёшли онахон бўлганимда қандай насиҳат қилган бўлардим: Қиз фарзанд туғинглар. Мол-мулкингизни қизларингизга беринг. Фарзандларингизни бир-бирига меҳрли қилиб тарбияланглар. Ўғилларингизни 20 ёшга тўлса уйдан чиқариб юборинглар. Уйланса ўзи алоҳида уй олиб уйлансин. Келинларни ота-онангизга ортикча яқинлаштирманглар, фақат меҳмондай келиб-кетишсин. Ҳурмат ва иззат сақлансин уларга ҳам, лекин бир том остид

👍4418🤯8😢4

4 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,650 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Орзулар баъзан армонга айланади🍂...

😢50💔144

1 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,490 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Боғчага ёки уйдаги энагага кўникиш даври 🐰Кўп оналар боласини боғчага ёки энагага топширишдан олдин битта саволни ўйлайди: "Боламни тарбиячи/энагага берсам ва тезда кетсам бўладими?" 🐰Болалар психологияси бўйича жавоб: ЙЎҚ. 3-4 ёшли бола — айнан боғчага мослашиш ёши — онадан тарбиячига "ҳиссий топширилиши" учун камида 6 ҳафта керак. Бу ёшда бола аллақачон гапиришни, ҳис-туйғуларини ифодалашни билади, аммо онадан уз

👍9❤‍🔥75🕊3

1 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC≈1,270 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ҳақиқий дўст оғир кунингда синалади, деган мақол эскирибди. Ҳақиқий дўст яхши кунларингни кўришга бардош берадиганлари бўлиб қолибди. @imaginative_girl

🤣43💯14🔥9😁3👍1

1 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,030 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Инсоннинг тақдири — ДНК ва онг ўртасидаги курашдир. @imaginative_girl

💯8👍7💘4

1 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈2,300 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ўзбек бўлсам ҳам миям немисларникидай экан;-) @imaginative_girl

19💯6❤‍🔥2😐2

30 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,020 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одамларнинг асл юзини кўриш учун қизиқарли ўйин ташкил қил. Маймун ким, эшак ким, чўчқа ким, шоқол ким, шер кимлигини четдан кузатишдан кўра завқлироқ "тадқиқот" йўқ бу дунёда, Сизларга айтсам) @imaginative_girl

18👍7

28 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,620 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Йўлингдаги ҳар қандай тўсиқни юксалишга хизмат қилдир. @imaginative_girl

👍18🔥75

28 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,680 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Деструктивликни мунтазам равишда талқин қилиш деструктивликнинг кучайишига олиб келади.» ( Рене Руссийон). У бир нўноқ бола мисолида келтиради: бола ҳамма нарсани беихтиер синдириб юборади. Агар унинг эътиборини бунга қаратиб, танбеҳ берилаверса, у янада кўпроқ нарсани синдира бошлайди. Аммо унга: «Эҳтимол, қўлингдан ҳамма нарса тушиб кетаётгани ва синаётгани сени қийнаётгандир, лекин бунинг қўрқинчли томони йўқ»,

👍136🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @imaginative_girl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Imaginative Girl 🦢” (@imaginative_girl), 3,930 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imaginative_girl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.