Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Илья Сплин channel

Channel

Илья Сплин channel

@ilyasplin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,271subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661516562
TypeChannel
Username@ilyasplin
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilyasplin

Growth

10,26610,27210,2697 August 2026 — 10,268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,267 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,270 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,272 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,271 subscribers10,2717 August 202618 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 11 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,265–10,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 19:3510,271+5
17 Aug 2026, 21:3410,266-6
14 Aug 2026, 01:1610,272+2
12 Aug 2026, 00:2210,270+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:2110,269+3
10 Aug 2026, 01:0110,266-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:0010,267-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:5310,269+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:4510,268first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.2%
avg views ÷ 10,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,850
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held34 (18 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total150,360
Reactions total4,619
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 09s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,156 reactions across 34 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,59150.3%
😁59211.5%
2945.70%
👏2855.53%
😱1793.47%
👌1382.68%
🙏991.92%
💯931.80%
🥱821.59%
🕊771.49%
💔751.45%
🫡751.45%
🤣731.42%
🤡681.32%
🤬561.09%
🥴531.03%
340.659%
330.64%
🤔260.504%
🤝260.504%
29 further kinds2074.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 34 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilyasplin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,900 views199 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Едим в кафе на секретной заправке На вывеске весь бензин по нулям, но на кассе - 95 по 140₽ сколько душе угодно. И еда из оленины есть.

😁117🔥5014👏6🍾4😐3🤔2🤮2

17 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,120 views165 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥77😱41😁15🫡14🙈54🙏3🏆2

17 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,040 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Это я Ване описывал расклад. Без цензуры 😁

👏2🤮1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈3,310 views134 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

+12 Дождь. Много дождя. Первое, что я сделал утром - заказал навигационную башню в Мурманск самой быстрой доставкой. Я был уверен, что у меня просто арктический сетап экипировки - но это справедливо, если ты не едешь на нейкеде по 14 часов в день в такую погоду.

🔥103😁14👏75🕊2🤪2🤮1

16 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈3,680 views203 reactions3 Starsread 18 August 2026

Я сегодня заглох по пути на заправку, проехав почти 400км на своем огромном 13-литровом баке. Заглох в 15 метрах от бензоколонки. Повезло. Но с бензином в Карелии не очень.

😱81🔥5032🤣11👻9🏆7😁7👌3

15 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈3,980 views215 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Доехали, краткий итог первого дня: - если учесть время, когда я выехал из дома и потом ждал Мишаню больше часа, то я побил свой электромобильный антирекорд «11 часов между мск и питером» - Ехали 115 на круизе. Погода +16/+17, местами дождь. Пожалел, что не купил раллийную башенку - при постоянной езде по трассе без ветрозащиты вообще становится зябко несмотря на экип, который и в куда больший холод отлично работает

🔥18316😨8😁4👏3🤮1

15 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈3,860 views241 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Начинается наше путешествие на Рыбачий! Главной челлендж этой поездки - топливо. Мой правый кофр превращен в канистру на 12 литров, что очень кстати, тк бак 13. Жду Майка и по плану сегодня до Питера

🔥189👏2388😁4🎉2👌2🫡2

14 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈4,280 views40 reactionsread 18 August 2026

У меня за много лет собралось несколько шлемов из дорогих линеек разных брендов - и некоторые модели отделаны (фурнитура, обивка) отлично, а некоторые - простенько. Однозначно классно сделаны AGV (Sportmodular) и Alpinestars (R10) NEXX (x.wed3) неплохо, но попроще. HJC туда же (RHPA90) SHOEI (Glamster) совсем просто за свой ценник. Arai ни разу не покупал.

31🔥8🤮1

14 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈4,050 views91 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, каким образом, но вы угадали верный вариант с большим отрывом. Вообще, я всегда хотел Руби, но будто бы под супервелоче Глэмстер больше подходит - да и вообще, он хоть на шлем похож. Пока не ездил в нем, но по первому впечатлению - простовато он сделан внутри за свой ценник. Покатаюсь - расскажу, как он вообще. Еще почему-то пинлок не пришел в комплекте, хотя должен был :(

🔥3424👌16🥴9😁2😱2🆒2🤮1

11 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈4,910 views185 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Кстати про ошибки - в субботу чуть не случился мой первый хайсайд. У меня из-за кучи модификаций стал неадекватно работать АБС, прям мешал тормозить после прямой. Отключил датчик, стало гораздо лучше. Решил сдвинуть на 20 метров точку торможения - в моем случае тормозишь там со 170 до 3 передачи, вход в 90 градусный поворот примерно на сотне, может чуть меньше. Тормозил со 100 метров, решил попробовать с 80. Отторм

😁99😱4111🤣10👌8👏7🙏32

11 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈5,130 views99 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

С первого поворота понятно, чем видео закончится. Вы тут уже опытные, понимаете, что мотоциклист делает не так? И, конечно, эта показушная уверенность, смешанная с отсутствием навыков и экипировки - меня вот прям такое раздражает.

💯44🌚19😁16🤡7🤔4😢43🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈5,310 views29 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥱15🔥12🤮2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @ilyasplin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,190 voters approx.

Заказал себе ретро-шлем под Агусту. Как думаете, какой?

  1. Agv x300010%
  2. HJC V1010%
  3. SHOEI Glamster26%
  4. Ruby Castel14%
  5. Arai Concept-XE19%
  6. Посмотреть результаты22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTCAnonymous Poll1,720 voters approx.

На что снять обзор ближайший

  1. Triumph Rocket 3R47%
  2. Triumph Daytona 66030%
  3. MV Agusta Superveloce33%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Андрей Скутерец
@ascooterets · 134,505
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Илья Сплин channel” (@ilyasplin), 10,271 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyasplin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.