Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Илья Овечкин (канал)

Channel

Илья Овечкин (канал)

@ilyaovechkincomedy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,251subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527291184
TypeChannel
Username@ilyaovechkincomedy
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilyaovechkincomedy

Growth

11,24811,27111,259.56 August 2026 — 11,271 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,269 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,262 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,257 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,263 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,262 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,248 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,255 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,250 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,251 subscribers11,2516 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,245–11,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:3611,251+1
15 Aug 2026, 16:3611,250-5
14 Aug 2026, 05:1711,255+3
12 Aug 2026, 22:4211,252+4
11 Aug 2026, 21:5511,248-14
10 Aug 2026, 19:1211,262-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:5111,263+6
8 Aug 2026, 23:0311,257-5
7 Aug 2026, 23:3511,262-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:4011,269-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3711,271first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 11,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,050
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (27 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total121,270
Reactions total5,449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,238 reactions across 22 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,59049.4%
❤‍🔥81015.5%
😁4749.05%
🥰2314.41%
🔥1973.76%
🤣1783.40%
🍓1362.60%
🕊1182.25%
👍791.51%
💋611.16%
571.09%
💯390.745%
💩290.554%
🤩260.496%
👏230.439%
💔220.42%
🤨220.42%
🙏200.382%
😍190.363%
🤡180.344%
13 further kinds891.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,449reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈2,750 views202 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сейчас все ругают современное кино. Могу сказать, что я счастлив, что не являюсь режиссером и мне не надо ничего снимать. Потому что щас просто ваще хз как сделать крутой фильм. Всё, что я посмотрел - F1, нового Паука, Проект Аве Мария, Нуарный Паук, Фантастическая Четверка, Голый пистолет 2025 и прочее прочее прочее - ну просто хуета грустная. Хотя ну хз, нормально сделанные фильмы. Но вообще не трогает за душу. А я

131🕊29🤡18🍌5🔥5💯4❤‍🔥3🍓2

14 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈3,260 views494 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Мне очень часто припоминают, что я однажды в этом тг-канале жестко раскритиковал девушек, которые любят кеды и надевают платья с кроссовками. Говорил, мол так одеваются замухрышки и неудачницы. И я по-прежнему придерживаюсь своих слов. Ещё платье с кроссами часто предпочитают девчонки из неблагополучных семей или девушки, которые выросли без отцов У них не было родительской фигуры, которая бы показала как надо одеват

257😁152❤‍🔥27🤣24👏8🥰7🍓6🔥6

14 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC≈3,050 views63 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁39❤‍🔥192🤣2💋1

13 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈3,490 views111 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

68🕊29💋10💩2🐳1🤯1

11 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC≈4,570 views630 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Отправлю без звука, чтобы никого не разбудить. Но вот вы представляете, я реально всего несколько недель назад ебашил по бездорожью на мотике. По деревне, без связи. Уебал куда-то на гору, смотрел закат. У меня не было карты, навигатора, я ехал домой по памяти. А ещё надо было мансить по деревне, потому что туда приехал патруль ментов, а мой мотик типа не мотик, а чисто как "спорт инвентарь" зареган. Меня бы штрафану

❤‍🔥365164🍓43💔22🥰11🕊10👍6🔥5

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈4,770 views236 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @comigrationPhoto

Илья Овечкин играет в Человека-паука (ноябрь 2023) 23 августа 2026 в Белграде состоится Творческий вечер Ильи Овечкина. Приходите!! Билеты — по ссылке

🤣11692🔥15🏆6🙏5💋2

10 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈5,190 views342 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ещё вот с чего в ахуе, когда люди в комментах так вот сверху-вниз пишут «Запомните:», а потом выдают просто двухкопеечную мысль. О, внатуре? Прям ЗАПОМНИТЬ? Спасибо, что глаза открыл на такую революционную мысль. Вот о чём думает такой чел? Типа «ща я их ошарашу откровением» «Запомните» кто блять? Туда же летят ебанаты, которые говорят такую же банальщину и говорят в конце «И точка.» Типа ебать закрыл диалог чел без

😁18087👍27💩12❤‍🔥9💯95🍓5

10 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC≈4,700 views347 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Вообще не понимаю тезис «если шутку надо объяснять, то это плохая шутка» Если шутку надо объяснять, то слушатель возможно тормоз ёбаный, которому всё надо разжёвыватт А возможно шутку надо объяснять, потому что чел не в контексте А возможно шутку надо объяснять, потому что она просто плохо сформулирована, что не делает её плохой автоматически, ведь суть у неё смешная Туда же отправляется «шутка либо смешная, либо не

❤‍🔥16487🤣34👍16🍓11👏11🥱9💯5

9 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈4,920 views242 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Тейбл с Мадиком 😍🙊 https://youtu.be/SBfgohqNLG0?si=VTwuWHHqBELaf-ov

129🔥63🤩26❤‍🔥9🕊5🌭4💋3😍3

8 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈5,320 views190 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ребзя, докупите пожалуйста последние 4 билета на завтрашний Вотафлаг в Белграде по вот этой ссылке Если будете хорошими ребятами и сделаете это, то обещаю завтра сняться в этих красивых туфельках 😍🙊 А если хотите, чтобы мы поискали вам пару прямо на сцене, то заполните, пожалуйста, нашу анкету и с вами свяжется менеджер! Целую вас! Увидимся завтра!

🥰9366😍16😁8❤‍🔥5🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈7,010 views231 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Почти готовы аж 3 выпуска Хуинглиша! Первый вы увидите уже совсем скоро Ваня красавчик! Очень рад с тобой работать!

❤‍🔥12472💯19🤔9👍3👎2💋2

7 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈5,140 views195 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Последний Вотафлаг вышел же? Метрики, цифры, всё отлично. Но читаю комменты.. Я не ожидал, что у нас в аудитории СТОЛЬКО не выкупающих

153😁18😱17💩5🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ilyaovechkincomedy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,074 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Илья Овечкин (канал)” (@ilyaovechkincomedy), 11,251 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyaovechkincomedy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.