Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ILYA BLANKO

Channel

ILYA BLANKO

@ilyablanko

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

70,638subscribers

+694 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454721675
TypeChannel
Username@ilyablanko
Descriptioninst: ilya_blanko Kick: https://kick.com/ilya-blanko 🌟ОБУЧЕНИЕ: @it_blanko_join_bot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilyablanko

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

69,13870,65669,8977 August 2026 — 69,944 subscribers7 August 2026 — 69,944 subscribers7 August 2026 — 69,943 subscribers8 August 2026 — 69,938 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,894 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,858 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,845 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,838 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,816 subscribers15 August 2026 — 69,804 subscribers16 August 2026 — 69,773 subscribers17 August 2026 — 69,724 subscribers18 August 2026 — 69,702 subscribers19 August 2026 — 69,661 subscribers20 August 2026 — 69,610 subscribers22 August 2026 — 69,595 subscribers23 August 2026 — 69,570 subscribers25 August 2026 — 69,534 subscribers26 August 2026 — 69,471 subscribers27 August 2026 — 69,449 subscribers28 August 2026 — 69,421 subscribers29 August 2026 — 69,409 subscribers30 August 2026 — 69,344 subscribers31 August 2026 — 69,311 subscribers1 September 2026 — 69,268 subscribers2 September 2026 — 69,228 subscribers3 September 2026 — 69,192 subscribers4 September 2026 — 69,138 subscribers7 September 2026 — 69,441 subscribers10 September 2026 — 70,560 subscribers12 September 2026 — 70,604 subscribers14 September 2026 — 70,656 subscribers16 September 2026 — 70,566 subscribers18 September 2026 — 70,638 subscribers70,6387 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +694. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,910–70,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:2270,638+72
16 Sept 2026, 05:1870,566-90
14 Sept 2026, 10:3670,656+52
12 Sept 2026, 19:1670,604+44
10 Sept 2026, 17:5570,560+1,119
7 Sept 2026, 18:4069,441+303
4 Sept 2026, 20:3769,138-54
3 Sept 2026, 05:5469,192-36
2 Sept 2026, 03:0269,228-40
1 Sept 2026, 03:2669,268-43
31 Aug 2026, 03:4369,311-33
30 Aug 2026, 05:4669,344-65
29 Aug 2026, 03:2669,409-12
28 Aug 2026, 05:1969,421-28
27 Aug 2026, 03:2869,449-22
26 Aug 2026, 02:1669,471-63
25 Aug 2026, 00:5969,534-36
23 Aug 2026, 15:3869,570-25
22 Aug 2026, 04:3869,595-15
20 Aug 2026, 18:4869,610first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 70,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,520
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held88 (9 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total413,650
Reactions total5,241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
556
Videos
143
Links
380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,051 reactions across 88 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,78743.3%
🔥1,42012.8%
❤‍🔥1,18810.8%
👏7466.75%
🤣6686.04%
💯6625.99%
👍4424.00%
😁2732.47%
⚡1511.37%
😱1411.28%
🍓990.896%
💊580.525%
🫡490.443%
🥰300.271%
😭290.262%
🤯290.262%
🌚260.235%
🦄260.235%
🤩240.217%
💅200.181%
29 further kinds1831.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,051 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
467
across the posts below
Posts paid on
55
of 88 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
253
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilyablanko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,410 views30 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026

Всем привет, дорогие друзья. Хочу отдельно обратиться к рекламодателям и ко всем, кто хочет запускать со мной проекты или предлагать сотрудничество. Пожалуйста, будьте максимально внимательны к тому, с кем вы общаетесь от моего имени. Я веду коммуникацию только: — через посредников, которые официально указаны в шапке моего Instagram; — напрямую через мой основной аккаунт в Instagram; — через аккаунты и техподдержк…

❤15👍6💯6🍓2👏1

29 Sept 2026, 23:26 UTC≈3,020 views128 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Завтра закину видос на YouTube о том, как берут под контроль уличные баннеры. Это будет скорее мини-гайд о том, как пользоваться данным инструментом, и как защититься от подобных атак☠️ реакция «❤️» если ждешь⚠️ Пока можете подписаться на мой канал на YouTube⛔️

❤103🔥18🍓4💯2❤‍🔥1

28 Sept 2026, 22:10 UTC≈4,450 views172 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Я к чему это спросил: сейчас запишу туда видос с прохождением OSINT-лабы. Что-то простое, лёгкое и без перегруза по сути, для новичков. Так что, если ждёте, поддержите «❤️».

❤137🔥16👏11💯4⚡2🍓2

28 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC≈4,730 views29 reactionsread 30 September 2026

и так родные свободно 600 мест чтобы зайти в бота: @Argus111_bot

❤16🔥7👏3🤣2⚡1

28 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈5,020 views105 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣64💯18❤6👏5🔥5👌4⚡1❤‍🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC≈5,700 views91 reactions9 Starsread 30 September 2026

А я вот нахуя делюсь инфой, которую вы сами просите? 😄 Давайте, заходим, лайкаем, комментируем. И напишите в комментариях, о каком софте ещё рассказать.

❤62👏16💯9🍌2👾1🕊1

27 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈5,630 views223 reactions8 Starsread 30 September 2026

реакций хотя бы киньте что вы живы))

🔥137🤣31❤28🫡12🍌6⚡4👨‍💻3👏2

27 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC≈5,630 views140 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026

Ладно не много вас порадую, новый софтяра подъехал NOX, в ролике выше рассказал что он умеет: https://clck.ru/3VdPD8

🔥78👏25💯15🍓11❤7⚡4

27 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,570 views118 reactions2 Starsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Ну че вы панкейки🫡 газ газ газ! Залил еще 3 OSINT инструмента⚠️ Смотрим кайфуем не делаем вид что всем похуй: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Ddee2UBM-Jg/?stkn=MWczbTFyaGNhc3hqZg==

👍66❤25👏16🍓3💯3💅2⚡1🏆1

25 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC≈6,210 views49 reactionsread 30 September 2026

На закрытой премьере Евгения Чебаткова🫡 Скоро на Кинопоиске выйдет🤫

🔥35💯6❤3👏3⚡1💊1

25 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC≈5,980 views37 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥23😎6🍓4💊2⚡1❤1

25 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈6,200 views34 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026

Еще 100 мест осталось🫡

👍22❤9🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @ilyablanko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 20:21 UTCAnonymous Poll1,370 voters approx.

YOUTUBE смотрите?

  1. Да85%
  2. Нет18%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ILYA BLANKO” (@ilyablanko), 70,638 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyablanko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.