запись стрима нужна?
❤42💯17👍13

Channel
@illyx07x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,688subscribers
+51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002167819245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @illyx07x |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/illyx07x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,688 | +16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 1,672 | +29 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 1,643 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1,637 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,637 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,948 |
| Reactions total | 412 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
412 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 197 | 47.8% | |
| 👍 | 83 | 20.1% | |
| 😁 | 29 | 7.04% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 4.13% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 3.16% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 2.91% | |
| 💊 | 10 | 2.43% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 2.43% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 2.18% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 1.94% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.46% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.971% | |
| 🙉 | 4 | 0.971% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.728% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.243% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.243% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
запись стрима нужна?
❤42💯17👍13
сегодня в 21:00 по еу стрим по твиттеру проведём в дискорде вечером. будут ещё гости но кого именно пока не палю узнаете когда зайдёте. по теме твиттера пройдёмся плотно свежие меты что работает сейчас что не работает и всё что накопилось за последнее время допилили наконец дискорд сервер он открыт для всех внутри уже нормальная структура каналы под разные направления система ролей чтобы найти своих и не тонуть в …
❤13❤🔥3👀1
не ну 3к баксов фикса без опыта, это сильно )))
😁18🤡5
добираем людей в команду на ведение аккаунтов что получаешь внутри: доступ к моим аккаунтам инструментам и рабочим связкам. работаешь с реальными активами не на песочнице команда кураторов по направлениям — монетизация, работа с проектами и тд. каждый пробит в своей теме и разбирает твои задачи по своей вертикали реальный опыт на живых задачах и настоящих проектах. учишься не в теории а в бою рядом с теми кто уже…
❤10👎4💩1🤡1
хожу по разным чатам и группам и всё чаще замечаю одну штуку новички которые пару недель в твиттере или максимум месяц реально верят что могут сделать лфч 100к+ за пару месяцев работы. не 2-3 тысячи в месяц которые в первые полгода реально сделать а сразу 6 значный чек и жизнь удалась и вот у меня к вам вопрос вы серьёзно верите что сейчас можно сделать 100к+ за пару месяцев в твиттере? на данном этапе рынка потом…
❤15
позвать еще кого-то из снг инфлов?
❤16
дискорд сервак почти готов когда делаем стрим по твиттеру
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
посоветуйте и подскажите кто сейчас топ снг инфл по твиттеру?
❤4👎1
в чате реально повторяются одни и те же вопросы, многие уже разобраны раньше, по 20-30 раз прежде чем спросить, попробуйте сначала тапнуть на поиск в чате и вбить ключевое слово. на скрине наглядный пример. вбил «гео», и выпало 56 результатов с реальными ответами: почему важно гео, что оно даёт, разбор от dantes про то что старые акки более трастовые и банов меньше, ссылки на предыдущие посты по темке это не «отста…
❤5👎2
может еще позвать лютого американского смарт инфла? у которого почти 170к фоловеров будет интересно послушать?
👍27😍13🔥4❤3
пацаны, делаем войс по твиттеру на выходных или в пятницу? как раз дс сервак будет готов если газ, жду тут много реакций
❤54👍18🔥8👏1
бля я уже дожился что готов писать хуйню на мейн аккаунтах лишь бы снг не спалили новую темку снг база любит парсить чужие акки смотреть кто что делает и сразу повторять один в один. через неделю после того как я бы что-то реальное дропнул вся ниша делала бы то же самое темка выжжена вот поэтому у меня публично светятся только пару моих старых аккаунтов. вся моя реальная ферма нигде не видна работает в тени и я не …
👍20💊10🤡4❤3👎1💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @illyx07x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
дискорд сервак почти готов когда делаем стрим по твиттеру
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 281,742 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“illyx07” (@illyx07x), 1,688 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illyx07x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.