Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,303–8,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 15:08
8,374
-5
7 Nov 2026, 09:30
8,379
-7
4 Nov 2026, 11:39
8,386
+7
1 Nov 2026, 02:28
8,379
+6
29 Oct 2026, 06:28
8,373
+7
26 Oct 2026, 07:06
8,366
-4
22 Oct 2026, 20:46
8,370
-3
19 Oct 2026, 07:26
8,373
-4
15 Oct 2026, 21:36
8,377
+2
12 Oct 2026, 15:45
8,375
-3
6 Oct 2026, 01:55
8,378
+22
28 Sept 2026, 20:00
8,356
-9
19 Sept 2026, 11:37
8,365
+1
15 Sept 2026, 08:16
8,364
+50
6 Sept 2026, 17:59
8,314
-13
30 Aug 2026, 00:09
8,327
-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:43
8,331
-8
23 Aug 2026, 06:06
8,339
-7
19 Aug 2026, 12:26
8,346
-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:19
8,347
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 8,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
906
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
23 (25 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
6,345
Reactions total
141
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,710
Videos
≈26
Links
≈789
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
799 reactions across 22 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
567
71.0%
🔥
83
10.4%
💔
39
4.88%
❤🔥
28
3.50%
👎
22
2.75%
💘
15
1.88%
😨
8
1.00%
👍
7
0.876%
😍
6
0.751%
🙉
6
0.751%
🎉
5
0.626%
💯
4
0.501%
⚡
3
0.375%
👏
2
0.25%
😁
2
0.25%
😭
1
0.125%
🙏
1
0.125%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Post Wave Prize for Illustration начал принимать работы на тему «Мост в другой мир»
Конкурс для начинающих иллюстраторов детских книг, которые еще не публиковались. Подавать нужно готовые обложку и разворот, плюс 3 работы в поддержку их.
Проект победителя будет представлена на стенде британского издательства Post Wave на книжной ярмарке в Болонье в 2027 году. А также победитель получит 3000 фунтов.
Дедлайн 4 янва…
Начало 👆👆👆
Главное отличие от обычной графики — полное отсутствие внутренней моделировки: здесь нет светотени, объема, штриха или прорисовки деталей. Изображение строится исключительно на плоскостном локальном пятне (вырезанном из чёрной бумаги или залитом тушью). Силуэт требует виртуозного чувства линии, ведь характер, эмоция и узнаваемость профиля передаются только через край формы.
Искусство силуэта XIX века мож…
Итак, подводим итоги финальной недели челленджа «Самокатобер». На этой неделе победителей двое — это «Весенний лось» Анны и «Октябрь в Нови Саде» Вероники. К обеим художницам приду в ЛС, чтобы подарить подарки!
А пока обещанные пару слов о том, что такое силуэтная графика и в чем ее особенности.
Силуэт в искусстве XIX века — это не просто чёрно-белый рисунок, а техника максимального лаконизма, где всё выразительное…
Долгожданные итоги завершающей недели челленджа #Самокатобер 2026 года!
Тема с силуэтом оказалась сложной. Завтра напишу подробный пост о традиции силуэтной иллюстрации, о его особенностях и чем силуэт отличается просто от черно-белого рисунка!
Ниже список победителей этой недели. Голосуем в следующей публикации до среды!
1️⃣ Мария. Крадущаяся лошадка
2️⃣ Анна. Весенний лось
3️⃣ Вероника Кобер. Октябрь в Нови Саде…
Если говорить про технику Эдварда Гори, то у него, как правило, мы видим перьевые рисунки, отсылающие нас с черно-белым книжным иллюстрациям викторианской эпохи. А они, в свое очередь, выросли из богатой художественной традиции прошлых эпох.
Или даже еще дальше —к макабрическим офортам Гойи и его ужасающим сериям «Капричос» и «Бедствия войны». А их предшественниками, в свою очередь, можно назвать апокалипсический ци…
Конец октября и начало ноября — идеальное время вспомнить об Эдварде Гори (1925–2000): художнике, нью-йоркском интеллектуале, денди и заядлом театрале. В этом году «Самокат» впервые на русском опубликовал трилогию о Трихорне.
Его графика повлияла на кино, моду и детскую литературу, а термин goreyesque стал синонимом утончённого викторианского нуара с чёрным марабрическим юмором. Без него сложно представить эстетику …
Сегодня стало известно о смерти Яёи Кусамы — известной японской художницы, чей концептуальный взгляд на абстракцию сильно повлиял в том числе и искусство книги
В 2012 году своем авторском прочтении «Приключений Алисы в Стране чудес» Льюиса Кэрролла Кусама предложила концепцию тотального иммерсива: её фирменный паттерн polka dot и бесконечные сети (infinity nets) превратили развороты в визуальный лабиринт, где текст…
Кроме того, на нашем стенде вы всегда найдете подборку лучших иллюстрированных книг. А Маша Морозова, автор канала, написала статью в сборник «Рев(ь)ю. Про иллюстрации в книгах».
Вся программа фестиваля тут.
Расскажите в комментариях о ваших впечатлениях о МОРСе этого года!
Ужа завтра стартует наш любимый фестиваль «Морс».
«Самокат» приготовил специальную программу!
Пятница 28 августа
💙11.45 — онлайн-лекция Юлии Дробовой «Как будто это было со мной: о детстве и вещах, которые его хранят». Помните, что ее книжка «Лошадки» была отмечена на BRAW в Болонье?
💙13.40 — онлайн-встреча с Еленой Репетур на тему «Скетч в иллюстрации». На стенде «Самоката» ищите все книжки о Еноте с иллюстрациями…
В преддверии ежегодного фестиваля «Морс» Аня Чефранова руководитель, вдохновитель и главная движущая сила проекта дала интервью нашему каналу.
Аня, как «Морс» изменился за эти годы?
Глобально мы всё те же: делаем фестиваль для иллюстраторов и про иллюстраторов. Ядро «Морса» неизменно: нам важно, чтобы художники показывали свои работы, а зрители видели, сколько прекрасного создаётся вокруг. Сегодня мы в точке, где …
Уже меньше, чем через неделю стартует главное событие в иллюстраторской жизни Москвы — Двенадцатый Международный независимый Фестиваль книжной иллюстрации и визуальной литературы МОРС 2026.
Как всегда, Самокат приготовил для вас отличную и разнообразную программу на фестивале. В том числе вас ждут мастер-классы по книжным новинкам этого сезона от Даши Димитровой (иллюстрации к книге Луиса Сепульведы «Про котов, чаек…
❤21❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @illustrationslegends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Люстра | Книжная иллюстрация @lustra_tg · 25,652 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Ищу ИЛЛЮСТРАТОРА фриланс @rabota_illustrator · 19,773 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 October 2026
Artnagrada @artnagrada · 19,945 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Lil.School — онлайн-школа рисования @lilschool · 19,150 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Легенды иллюстрации” (@illustrationslegends), 8,374 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illustrationslegends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.