OKNUM REPACK 2ND ini kemungkinan beda orang dari yang diatas yaa. gua rasa emoji lain disini juga bukan original dari dia karena beberapa gua tau pack aslinya. jadi buat kalian jangan pernah pake pack yang bukan dari pack asli ya sayang, siapapun yang save pack ini tolong di remove https://t.me/addemoji/sodoilooklikehim_by_TgEmojis_bot satu langkah kecil bagi kamu berarti besar buat kita, ini juga upaya biar pack o…
Channel
⚠️
@illexplainbabe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002378104957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @illexplainbabe |
| Created | 8 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/illexplainbabe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
spillan ini gua bikin sekalian warning dan reminder buat semuanya yaa, mungkin ada emoji kalian di pack beliau bisa sekalian ngamuk hehehe. biasakan bedain spillan mengandung informasi yang kamu butuhin atau engga nya, terimakasii 🤎🤎
makasi buat yang uda pake punya skaye, gua seneng kalian pake itu juga gua bikin buat public use ko. tapi harap digaris bawahi doesnt mean public use seenaknya jiplak ataupun repack
segini aja uda cukup menjelaskan semuanya kan?? tolong jangan ditiru yaa, gua yang nguras effort ngedit sampe ngeluarin duit jadiin ke animated emoji nyesek banget liatnya. gaperna gua ngedit emoji nyomot pin langsung dijadiin emoji, pasti ada sesuatu yang gua edit ntah itu ganti warna ataupun gua draw lagi.
Sticker, posted without a caption
ya ampun jauh jauh deh orang kaya gini, pas ngambil otak absen ya??
update, dari seller blue yang chatnya uda dibales wkwk tengil juga ni anak
ini kronologi dari si seller diatas
Awalnya dia ngepost pack2 emojinya di sini @Propertyalmond tapi sekarang udah dia edit, cuma chat gua ga dibales2 kemungkinan dia baca dari luar doang
bisa diliat disini, ini chattan dari seller yang jadi korban almond ini, t.me/illexplainbabe/4?single perhatiin lagi ya disini jelas pack nya sama punya dia
https://t.me/MONDEXTT/65 mas nya kenapa kalo bukan situ malah restrict tele gini? kan bisa jelasin atuh dan jelas jelas di link emoji sahabat atas nama 'almond' http://t.me/addemoji/t_me_almonds_by_fStikBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @illexplainbabe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 99,814 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@illexplainbabe named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚠️” (@illexplainbabe), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illexplainbabe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.