Channel
@ilkemarketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001569420095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilkemarketing |
| Created | 27 August 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilkemarketing |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:15 | 27 | -1 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 28 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 29 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 31 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 33 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 33 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 27 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
😀 Dextools 😀100 Bullish Votes $20 6h Trend $6500 12h Trend $7500 24h Trend $9000 🚀 CMC Daily Bullish Trend $300 CMC Bullish Votes CMC Listing Votes CoinGecko Votes Dexscreener Reactions 📥📥📥 Write me for negotiate the price. ◾ If you are interested, you can contact me. @ilkemarket
📱 Reddit Upvotes and Trend Posts Prices r/CryptoMoonShots (CMS) 💸 🔣 CMS post + 5 altsubreddit posts $20 🔣 10 CMS posts + 200 altsub posts $250 (in 10 hours) 🔥 Hot 1 $75 🔥 Hot 1-3 $50 🔥 Hot 1 CMS and 10 altsubs trend $100 🚀 Weekly Top 1 $125 🚀 Monthly Top 1 $175 🚀 Yearly Top 1 $300 🚀 All Time Top 1 $600 🔣 1K Upvotes $100 𝗛𝗼𝘁#𝟭 + 𝗧𝗼𝗽#𝟭 + 2K 𝗨𝗽𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 $200 🔥 ◾ If you are interested, you can contact me. @ilkemar
📱 Telegram DMs: $500 per 10K DMs $1000 per 25K DMs $2000 per 50K DMs $3750 per 100K DMs $7500 per 250K DMs $12,500 per 500K DMs $23,500 per 1M DMs 📱 Twitter DMs: $1000 per 25K DMs $2000 per 50K DMs $3750 per 100K DMs $7500 per 250K DMs $12,500 per 500K DMs $23,500 per 1M DMs 📱 Discord DMs: $1000 per 25K DMs $2000 per 50K DMs $3750 per 100K DMs $7500 per 250K DMs $12,500 per 500K DMs $23,500 per 1M DMs 📱 IG DMs:…
↗️ Coin Votes CoinSniper CoinHunt CoinVote CoinScope RugFreeCoin GemHunter GemFinder EarlyCoins CoinMooner CnToken 1k Votes $75 📱 Telegram Services Prices 1k Bot Slow $20 1k Bot Medium Speed $25 1k Bot Fast Speed $30 1k Real Members $40 1k Member Instantly $45 1k Post Views Last 5 Posts $1 Last 10 Posts $2 Last 50 Posts $5 Last 100 Posts $8 😀 4Chan Prices In /biz/ - Business & Finance 1 post $25 4 posts $75 …
📱 Twitter Services Prices Twitter Trend Topic $450 1k Twitter Followers $30 1k Tweet Likes $20 1k Retweet $40 10k Video Views 30$ Tweet Comments Twitter Interaction # Interaction Packet (Suggestion) Profile View 3k Tweet View 3k + 2k Like + 1k Retweet + 50k Video View and Organic Tweet Shilling 250$ * I can do as much as you want. ◾ If you are interested, you can contact me. @ilkemarket
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ilkemarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ilke Marketing Service” (@ilkemarketing), 27 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilkemarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.