Photo, posted without a caption
🍌1

Channel
@iknnee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
15,246subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001972883917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iknnee |
| Description | 專注 台灣正妹|極品少婦|日系氣質、OL御姐 每日高質短片推薦 18+ 成人向 高質量專屬 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iknnee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 15,246 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 15,249 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 15,253 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 15,258 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 15,266 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 15,267 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 15,275 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 15,285 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 15,288 | +27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 15,261 | +30 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 15,231 | +37 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 15,194 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 15,204 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 15,208 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 15,224 | +15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 15,209 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 15,203 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 15,220 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 15,232 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 15,238 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (18 June 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 38,346 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 35 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 85 | 73.9% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 11.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🍌1
高颜值白月光女神,装扮颜值太出众,之前看过,没想到瘦下来改变这么大,跟别人都不是一个画风,冲就完了 🎬蜜桃印畫Pro攝影工作室/把慾望拍成電影 成人性映像創作 最真实素人约炮(具體行為想象) 为兄弟们呈现您想要程度 更多精彩內容查看
🍌2
气质丰满人妻性感美乳乳交极致享受,丰满身材各种姿势轻松拿捏,冲就完了 🎬蜜桃印畫Pro攝影工作室/把慾望拍成電影 成人性映像創作 最真实素人约炮(具體行為想象) 为兄弟们呈现您想要程度 更多精彩內容查看
🍌2
韩系美乳御姐装扮身材都太顶了,乳交各种榨精淫技满足,颜值高,身材好,冲就完了 🎬蜜桃印畫Pro攝影工作室/把慾望拍成電影 成人性映像創作 最真实素人约炮(具體行為想象) 为兄弟们呈现您想要程度 更多精彩內容查看
🍌1
蜜桃印畫Pro pinned Deleted message
🗣博主联盟群(各种风格题材)每日持续更新中 ❗️ 只做精品内容 ❗️把品质拉满的体验,留给真正懂的人 当然也可以单独购买您需要喜欢的博主 预览:https://t.me/lianmenghuitui8888 点击购买:https://t.me/BOyuepabot?start=yqhjzktERB8GU 一次性解锁全部权限 ❗️原价💰999,现只需 💰777 巨省巨划算 一次付费,永久开通: ✅ 会员群 ✅ 已开发素人群 ✅ 摄影教学群 ✅ 素人开发教学群 ✅共计8个群 并同步获得 专属尊享群 权限。 尊享群在拥有以上全部资源权限, 私密内容 大佬定制专属作品与视频 未公开花絮与完整幕后 模特真实啪啪全程实录 更刺激的重度调教、羞辱、硬核玩法 会员群从未收录的高能私密版本 内容持续更新,一次进群长期有效。 性价比之王,名额有限。 需要直接点击购买, 审核通过后立刻拉入全部群。
Photo, posted without a caption
金发短发要素拉满,微胖丰满身材更是无敌,冲就完了,极致温柔的享受 🎬蜜桃印畫Pro攝影工作室/把慾望拍成電影 成人性映像創作 最真实素人约炮(具體行為想象) 为兄弟们呈现您想要程度 更多精彩內容查看
🍌1👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
🍌2
·性感御姐情趣装榨精淫技太顶了,微胖身材更是顶中顶,冲就完了 🎬蜜桃印畫Pro攝影工作室/把慾望拍成電影 成人性映像創作 最真实素人约炮(具體行為想象) 为兄弟们呈现您想要程度 更多精彩內容查看
🍌2
蜜桃印畫Pro pinned a video
Photo, posted without a caption
🍌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @iknnee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@iknnee edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“蜜桃印畫Pro” (@iknnee), 15,246 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iknnee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.