Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for nyil

Channel

nyil

@ikanghiyewonn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001981179029
TypeChannel
Username@ikanghiyewonn
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ikanghiyewonn

Growth

115 Aug 2026, 07:47 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 07:4715 Aug 2026, 08:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:001no change
15 Aug 2026, 07:471first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.0%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held19 (6 July 202625 July 2026)
Views total13
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
241
Videos
25
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

thanks for ur question, hari ini baik [] aktivitas aku hari ini semuanya berjalan lancar, ketemu anak2 manis. cuma bawaannya ngantuk sambil dengerin london boy. anw hbu?

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

selain jaehyun aku suka suho, alesannya karna apa ya kalo liat suho tuh kek adem banget kaya dia tuh "gantleman" banget vibesnya berwibawa dan clean looks kek MY TYPE BANGET. terus yang kedua aku suka kun gege, apa yah dia tuh ganteng ditambah kek manis banget senyumnya mana dia juga cowo "smart" aduh kek YUK NIKAH. yang ketiga ada jeno, kalo ini semua juga pasti bakal setuju kalo dia mantep banget ditambah eye smile

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

beberapa hari ini comfort song ku lagunya mami taylor swift yang london boy 🫣

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

mau jadi hewan magis, tapi yang bentuknya lucu terus jadi hewan peliharaan kesayangan gitu. kaya ga bakal cape deh

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

kenapa harus berpaling? aku bisa adil kok omah. siang sama omah, malamnya sama jaehyun kan bisa. atau gantian hari ini omah besoknya jaehyun gitu 😌

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

aku suka dua2nya dhira my kemangi.. [] biasanya aku tuh nonton sampe bosen, terus habis itu baca sampe bosen juga. jadi keduanya sama2 ku suka, aku jadi bingung harus pilih yang mana ~

25 Jul 2026, 03:27 UTC1 viewsread 15 August 2026

banyak deh kayanya, yang pasti ketemu sama orang2 baik yang selalu ada selama ini di semua fese rpku. ngobrol bareng bercanda bareng apapun itu, kaya dirayain waktu ultah kemarin, terus dibuatin new year latters, valentines day latters pokonya apapun hal yang menurutku manis semuanya berkesan

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ikanghiyewonn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,529,201 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nyil” (@ikanghiyewonn), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ikanghiyewonn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.