aku gatau ini nomor siapa deh guys
Channel
@IJJANAUI SCAMMER
@ijjanauispill
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004341179743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ijjanauispill |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ijjanauispill |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 14 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4116.7%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.2
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (14 October 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 494 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Wa gua aja
Wa.me/6285755142619
ga sehat mental sih ni orang
ga ada disini sih cuma yang bikin bete tuh dia berkali kali bilang “saya izin hack kamu ya” kek aduh RAGEBAIT BANGET
ngomong samaa orang gila tuh beneran bisa gila sendiri sumpah dari pada aku ilang kewarasan mending aku ilang duit biar orang susah (RE: WELLY JMBT) bisa makan. aku anggep sebagai sedekah aja.
Sticker, posted without a caption
total kerugian aku ada di 120.000
Sticker, posted without a caption
karena he texted me pas aku di kantor and aku lagi banyak kerjaan, aku males urusin scam dan ancaman dia jadi aku tf lagi ke dia 20k, aku kira dia cuma butuh another 20k untuk imbangin 80k. dia juga sempet bilang katanya dia ga rela kasih aku 60k, to which aku bingung karena kalo ga rela mestinya bilang aja dari awal. tapi dia tetep ancem aku lagi dan bilang bakal lacak aku dan hack wa aku, aku kasih lagi trick quest…
pas weekend aku kena tipu qris pembayaran pas lagi live tiktok, nah aku emosi dan aku akhirnya wtb jasa hack di telegram. (sebelumnya aku ga tau tentang modus jasa hack yang ngescam ataupun welly scammer ini karena aku jarang nongkrong di baseee) karena udah kalap banget, aku chat aja si januar itu. kita diskusi harga, awalnya dia kasih bundle gitu harganya 120k, aku ga mau karena aku ga rela keluarin uang segitu unt…
aku lupa dia dulu atau aku dulu tapi aku bilang "kak simpen aja 50knya aku gamau tau apapun lagi tentang scammernya" terus tiba tiba dia chat aku terus maksa aku untuk bayar sisa 10knya, disana karena aku males ladenin aku kirim aja 10k dan aku tanyain "mana kak progressnya" gitu gitu pokoknya aku udah tau aku ditipu cuma aku berusaha positif thinking. terus dia jawab bentar lagi selesai dan abis itu ngilang. disana …
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ijjanauispill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@IJJANAUI SCAMMER” (@ijjanauispill), 1 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ijjanauispill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.