Channel
@iizuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,002subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001876143843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iizuk |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iizuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 3,002 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 3,010 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 3,025 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 3,023 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 3,023 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 145 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8月6日, 广东网友发帖称, 广州荔湾区等地近期以“灭蚊防控”为由开展“全区攻坚周”, 强制基层及编外人员取消休假/早七晚九连续工作强制进入居民家中点烟消杀. 还有社区员工反映已被拖欠半年工资且无加班费, 而所谓“干部下沉”仅是到现场监督挑毛病. 同时, 工作人员强制入户点烟消杀也引发居民强烈反感, 被指侵犯隐私. 有网友质疑此类运动式防控“是否准备年年都搞”. -推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-08:00
网友爆料: 一男子在中国某外卖平台点外卖, 送来的鸭腿竟然吃出了活生生的蛆虫, 鸡腿里也是死蛆, 还在外卖盒子里发现了已经死了的疑似蟑螂. https://t.co/SPUUbxHZ4s-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:49
RT : 在任何场合, 台湾都在被中国打压, 不论是台湾人的台湾国还是中华民国, 所以所谓的“九二共识 ”根本就没有共识, 更拿不出黑纸白字的法律文件. 中共的所谓“共识”就是只有中华人民共和国, 醒醒吧! 舔共国民党. https://t.co/q1bPrWN2He-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:42
RT : 习近平老家陕西龙脉断了以后, 帝都北京淹水严重, 中南海早晚会被冲走. https://t.co/1PB3ALOG9s-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:29
RT : 补课举报怕报复?隔壁就是教育局但装聋作哑? 别怕, 你的身份我们来保密, 你的诉求我们替你发声. 严密保护隐私, 杜绝学校穿小鞋! 为我们提供详细的违规补课线索, 611 团队不仅会根据投稿拨打举报电话, 还会对红黑榜里特别恶劣的学校和校长定点质询! https://t.co/vpbtS2T9cQ-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:26
A police manhunt through Henan cornfields; a traditional bamboo toy becoming a symbol of resistance against Huawei; and state regulations tightening exit-and-entry controls. Here is what Chinese citizens documented this week in The Wall (August 1–7):-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:15
RT : 美国最近解密了, 北京打算接管台湾的文件. 也打算派武警来台北, 用无人机斩首 截断各大媒体讯号, 制造台湾各地失手的ai影片. 你说最近这些是不是在发生? 中国国师表示, 未来台湾不是省, 也不会是特别行政区. 是军事特别岛, 中国海权的基地, 对美日开战的前线. 不想打共军的, 可以去打美日联军呦. 48秒看不懂的, 完整版17分钟在摄徒日记YT. -推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-06:58
RT : 问台湾女生, 为什么捐款给日本, 不愿意中国? 台湾女生: 拜托你先搞清楚, 台湾不是没帮过中国, 汶川地震台湾人捐了超过70亿, 结果换来什么? 军机天天绕台, 打压/还阻挡我们进WHO. 日本311我们也捐, 人家感谢到现在, 中国呢?平常天天喊武统, 有事才喊同胞. 想要台湾人的爱心?先把导弹收回去. -推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-06:56
8月7号, 甘肃某商场出现“中国何以强缘有共产党”的标语牌遭到网友群嘲. https://t.co/ZIEv1Jt44K-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-07:00
阎锡山剖析中共何以得到江山, 八大原因, 字字扎心! -枫林漫谈 💠联合快讯 8.8-05:00
RT : 習近平の故郷である陝西省の龍脈が断たれた後/帝都北京は洪水がひどくなり/中南海は早晩流されてしまうだろう. 习近平老家陕西龙脉断了以后, 帝都北京淹水严重, 中南海早晚会被冲走. https://t.co/1PB3ALOG9s - YiFeng Su-推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-06:21
RT : 8月6日, 国际媒体广泛报道台湾国军在台北淡江大桥举行的军事演习. 这场演练展示了台湾防卫力量的准备与决心. 作为一名中国人, 我坚定支持台湾人民守卫自己的国家, 捍卫自由与民主, 不被任何外部势力侵略. 历史已经证明, 中国对香港的全面殖民, 严重削弱了当地的法治/言论自由与经济活力, 令许多香港人失望而出走流亡, 不少人遭到严重迫害. 中国所谓的“统一”台湾, 不仅会让台湾人民的生活方式与权利遭受到毁灭性打击, 对中国人自身也绝非福音. 因为长期以来, 中国都不善待其统治下的人民. -推特 💠联合快讯 8.8-06:21
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @iizuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,036,303 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💠联合快讯-@iiZUK” (@iizuk), 3,002 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iizuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.