Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

第三千禧年IIIM

@iiimchinese

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,037subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260686989
TypeChannel
Username@iiimchinese
Description圣道教育 面向全球 免费共享
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iiimchinese

Growth

2,0377 Aug 2026, 00:18 — 2,037 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:40 — 2,037 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:187 Aug 2026, 00:40
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,035–2,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 00:402,037no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:182,037first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.0%
avg views ÷ 2,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
856
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 February 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,425
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Videos
93
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
45m 08s
Average length
4m 06s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5371.6%
👍1824.3%
👏22.70%
🙏11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC606 viewsread 7 August 2026

🫶🫶亲爱的各位牧者、同工、组长,平安! 感恩在刚刚过往的三个周六的上午,我们恩城教会学院在线上完成了三次工人证书实践课程的培训。参与的组长们在讲员的教导和模拟的小组讨论中,都得着了如何更好带领小组的一些宝贵的建议,并感受到作为组长在把控时间、更智慧的鼓励组员参与、给圣灵的工作留白等方面,随时需要主的帮助和恩典的引导。求主不断的帮助我们每一位组长和组员,在每一次的小组团契中,都来依靠并经历主的扶持和圣灵奇妙的工作。 接下来,恩城学院即将推出门徒证书第一次的跟进培训 —— 探索基督教。特别邀请2026年春季和夏季进入恩城教会学院小组的组长们参加。 具体的培训时间和ZOOM信息如下: 时间:2026年08月22日 (周六) 8:30-11:30 AM(北京时间) ZOOM会议号: 891 0861 4691 密码: 1962 请各位组长预留时间参加此次培训,并预备带领各自小组的组员们开始本课程的学习。

31 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC965 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘️亲爱的各位牧者、组长们,平安! 感谢主引导我们7月18日《新要理问答》的线上组长培训。Jason老师充分结合了我们恩城学院的的教学核心理念思想力、生命力和行动力来设计学习的内容和步骤,其中还运用了一句话祷告,学习者成为主导者等济州岛退修会传递的元素。 在演练环节后,增加了演练后的反思,既新颖,又受益。除此之外,还有常见问题和建议。感觉到Jason老师多年带领小组累计的经验很宝贵,又能很切实的分享,帮助到组长们。盼望大家在其中都有所收获。 续6月13日,我们进行了工人学院第一次跟进课程中的理查德·科尼什的《简明教会历史》的培训,8月1日我们即将安排另一本埃德蒙.克鲁尼的《教会》的线上培训。 具体的培训时间和ZOOM信息如下: 时间:2026年08月01日 (周六) 8:30-11:30 AM(北京时间) ZOOM会议号: 891 0861 4691 密码: 1962 盼望我们明天见!☕️

3

13 Jul 2026, 05:06 UTC≈1,810 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌈🌈亲爱的各位组长,牧者,平安! 续7月18日的《新城要理问答》的线上培训,我们恩城教会学院会推出工人证书的第三模块实践课程第二部分的线上培训。 我们请讲员来带领组长们一同来学习《认识神》这本书。本书被公认为20世纪最重要的基督教经典著作之一。这本书的核心命题是:“知道关于神”与“亲自认识神”之间有天壤之别,真正的“认识”必然带来对神的敬拜、信靠与顺服。 具体的培训信息如下: 时间:2026年7月25日上午8:30-11:30(北京时间) ZOOM会议号: 891 0861 4691 密码: 1962 请各位组长预留时间来参加此次的培训。🫶🫶

👍42

7 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,900 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌈🌈亲爱的各位组长,牧者,平安! 本月我们恩城教会学院会推出工人证书的实践课程的线上培训。 我们会请讲员来带领组长们一同来学习《新城要理问答》这本书。这本书分为三个部分,分别对应着工人证书第三、第四和第五实践课程的第一部分。 具体的培训信息如下: 时间:2026年7月18日上午8:30-11:30(北京时间) ZOOM会议号: 891 0861 4691 密码: 1962 请各位组长预留时间来参加此次的培训。 期待两周后我们线上见!🫶🫶

3🙏1

18 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC≈2,300 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

亲爱的各位组长、牧者,平安! 再次邀请大家把我们恩城教会学院新组长培训的海报,以安全的方式发送给有需要的教会牧者和同工。 盼望更多的教会可以了解恩城教会学院和三千学院的资源,并通过装备有服侍心志的组长们,来祝福祂的国度和属祂的百姓。 谢谢!🌈🌈

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iiimchinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 502,520 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“第三千禧年IIIM” (@iiimchinese), 2,037 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iiimchinese.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.