Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

الصورة تقول

@iiiii9

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

70,449subscribers

-306 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001010335773
TypeChannel
Username@iiiii9
Descriptionعندما يجف الحبر تتحدث الصورة . نحن نهتم بجمع أجمل الصور الإنسانية والمعبرة الي تلامس مشاعركم.
Created15 February 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iiiii9

Growth

70,44970,75570,6025 August 2026 — 70,755 subscribers6 August 2026 — 70,755 subscribers6 August 2026 — 70,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,682 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70,580 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70,544 subscribers11 August 2026 — 70,492 subscribers12 August 2026 — 70,449 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -306. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,403–70,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:4570,449-43
11 Aug 2026, 11:2270,492-52
10 Aug 2026, 10:5270,544-36
9 Aug 2026, 08:4170,580-53
8 Aug 2026, 06:0470,633-49
7 Aug 2026, 09:0170,682-53
6 Aug 2026, 11:5070,735-20
6 Aug 2026, 01:3570,755no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:3770,755first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.25%
avg views ÷ 70,449 subscribers
Avg views / post
176
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held96 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total16,915
Reactions total54
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,760
Videos
7,340
Links
3,850

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 21m
Average length
19m 04s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😍2958.0%
👍1836.0%
🔥36.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC119 viewsread 13 August 2026

‏يا وهّاب ‏هب لي من عطاياك ‏هب لي من متاع الدنيا والآخرة ‏هب لي رزقاً وفيراً وصب عليّ الخير صباً ‏هب لي من خزائن نعمك مالا عين رأت ‏ولا أذن سمعت ولا خطر على قلب بشر ‏هب لي تسخير وتيسير ويُسر ومسرة ‏هب لي حظ كريم وعوض جميل.

12 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC147 viewsread 13 August 2026

اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّنَا آتِنَا فِي الدُّنْيَا حَسَنَةً وَفِي الْآخِرَةِ حَسَنَةً وَقِنَا عَذَابَ النَّارِ.

12 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC174 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

https://quranygnnaty.com/public/filedetails/7766/video-view

12 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC162 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

https://quranygnnaty.com/public/filedetails/4867/video-view

12 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC120 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

https://quranygnnaty.com/public/filedetails/1476/video-view

12 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC150 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‏﴿ إنّ اللّٰهَ ومَلائكتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ على النبي يا أيُها الذينَ آمنوا صَلُّوا عليهِ وسلِّمُوا تسليمًا ﴾

😍1

12 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC154 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

https://quranygnnaty.com/filedetails/3976/vide-view

12 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC135 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

https://quranygnnaty.com/public/filedetails/4761/video-view

12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC158 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @QuranyjannatyofficialPhoto

قال تعالى ( وان ليس للإنسان إلا ما سعى وان سعيه سوف يرى ثم يجزاه الجزاء الأوفى. . .)

12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC150 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

زادك اليوم قراءة صفحة من القرآن = 4000 حسنة 🌹 الحرف = 10 حسنات 🌹 🌟 قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم { : من قرأ حرفا من كتاب الله فله حسنة والحسنة بعشر أمثالها ، لا أقول الم حرف ، ولكن ألف حرف ، ولام حرف ، وميم حرف } . رواه الترمذيhttps://quran.ksu.edu.sa/index.php?l=ar#aya=23_43&m=hafs&qaree=husary&trans=ar_mu

12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC125 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Quranyjannatyofficial

لا تغفلوا عن ذكر الله : • سبحان الله • الحمدلله • لا اله الا الله • الله اكبر • لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله • استغفر الله العظيم واتوب اليه • سبحان الله وبحمده، سبحان ربي العظيم • لا اله الا انت سبحانك اني كنت من الظالمين • لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له، له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شيء قدير • حسبنا الله سيؤتينا الله من فضله انّا الى الله راغبون • اللهم صلِّ وسلم وبارك على سيدنا محمد. • اللهم صبَّ علينا الخير والرزق

11 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC186 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ربي! ما سئِمتُ مناداتك، لأنني أعلمُ أنك تسمعني، ولا تردّدتُ في طلبي لأنني أوقن أنك تعطيني، ما ضاقت بي إلا اتّسعت بكرمك، ولا أظلمت إلا أشرقت بتدبيرك".

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @iiiii9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 343,040 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قرآني جناتي ♥️
@Quranyjannatyofficial · 179,107
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الصورة تقول” (@iiiii9), 70,449 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iiiii9.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.