Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for У меня подагра 😱

Channel

У меня подагра 😱

@ihavegout

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,711subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285536891
TypeChannel
Username@ihavegout
Created20 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ihavegout

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6608,7118,685.57 August 2026 — 8,669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,669 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,666 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,661 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,667 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,662 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,660 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,662 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,665 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,669 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,670 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,674 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,664 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,663 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,691 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,694 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,699 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,700 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,697 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,699 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,703 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,711 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,707 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,711 subscribers7 August 20261 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,652–8,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 20:558,711+4
30 Oct 2026, 03:068,707-4
26 Oct 2026, 17:068,711+8
23 Oct 2026, 18:598,703+4
20 Oct 2026, 11:458,699+2
17 Oct 2026, 21:048,697-3
14 Oct 2026, 12:288,700+1
11 Oct 2026, 04:378,699+5
5 Oct 2026, 08:368,694+3
26 Sept 2026, 18:178,691+28
17 Sept 2026, 11:198,663-1
13 Sept 2026, 17:208,664-10
9 Sept 2026, 19:008,674+4
4 Sept 2026, 20:598,670+1
1 Sept 2026, 12:238,669+4
29 Aug 2026, 13:288,665+3
26 Aug 2026, 13:528,662+2
23 Aug 2026, 09:478,660-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:228,662-5
17 Aug 2026, 09:558,667first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 07s
Average length
6m 02s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,188 reactions across 21 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍42035.4%
🔥19316.2%
❤16113.6%
custom 526473767268490739615012.6%
custom 5402227731972771532867.24%
🤔363.03%
😁262.19%
custom 5406759193052995173252.10%
🎉231.94%
✍110.926%
custom 535524248626660193290.758%
👀90.758%
💯70.589%
🙏60.505%
👎50.421%
👏50.421%
🙈50.421%
🍌30.253%
🐳20.168%
🤯20.168%
4 further kinds40.337%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 22 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ihavegout. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC176 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Сегодня в 18:00 будет лекция по мотивам опроса об отношении к врачам. Расскажу о позитивных изменениях в лечении подагры за последнее время. По большей части эти изменения касаются контроля приступов в начале терапии аллопуринолом и фебуксостатом. Если сталкивались с этим, и вопрос актуальный - особенно рекомендую посетить. Подробности здесь https://t.me/ihavegout/1589 Билеты на лекцию здесь https://payform.ru/olci…

👍2👌1🤔1

22 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,590 views49 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍32✍11🔥4❤2

13 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈3,090 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥16👍12❤5😁3

10 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈3,230 views53 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍24❤17custom 53552424862666019329👎2🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈3,190 views24 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Вы довольны врачами, которые консультировали вас по подагре?

  1. Да, они (он) произвели хорошее впечатление16%
  2. Да, но хорошего пришлось поискать. Попадались и так себе17%
  3. Нет, был(а) у нескольких: хоть один бы что дельное сказал34%
  4. Нет. Был(а) у одного - не понравилось. К другим не обращался(лась)18%
  5. Не был(а) у врачей15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍19❤5

7 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,950 viewsread 28 August 2026

Совсем забыл 🤦‍♂️ у меня же был старый опрос в тему видео с анализом медицинского поста. Давно хотел обновить - вдруг отношение поменялось

3 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC≈4,150 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Молодой динамично развивающий соцсети кардиолог решил рассказать о подагре. К задаче подошёл творчески - пост вышел своеобразный (или, как написали у меня на Ютубе, "бред и верх не компетенции"😁). Я записал подробный разбор этого поста. Получилось что-то вроде мини-лекции о лекарствах для лечения подагры, ну и повод задуматься над вопросом: "Всегда ли сказанное врачом заслуживает доверия?" 🤔 Из-за особенностей теле…

👍33❤7🔥2🙈2

18 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈6,250 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔15🔥7👍6

18 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈5,960 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Мелоксикам - известный обезболивающий препарат😫 Относится к группе нестероидных противовоспалительных (НПВП). Их там много разных, поэтому часто встаёт вопрос, какой выбрать именно при подагре. Сначала про рейтинг Речь о голосовании за лучший/худший НПВП среди подписчиков “У меня подагра 😱”. В основе рейтинга два критерия: положительные оценки минус сообщения о побочках. Мелоксикам занял 4-е место - можно сказать, …

❤19👍14🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC≈4,100 views62 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В начале болезни я очень часто ходил на анализ и делал разные эксперименты - хотелось понять, что реально влияет на МК 🤔 На графике результаты >30 измерений, сделанных за полтора года в одной и той же лаборатории. Бо́льшую часть этого времени я принимал 100 мг Аллы (был период, когда игрался с дозировками - он помечен отдельно). Один из экспериментов: 100г вишни ежедневно (уверен, никому из собравшихся не нужно объя…

custom 540675919305299517325👍20❤16🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈4,290 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Зачем знать свою ФЭМК? Сомневаюсь, что кого-нибудь врач направлял на этот анализ👩‍⚕️ Более того, ему даже не обязательно знать, что это. В современных протоколах по диагностике и лечению подагры фракционная экскреция МК никак не участвует. Сейчас на неё смотрят только в специальных научных работах. По сути “рядовому” подагрику можно узнать свою ФЭМК просто для собственного интереса - убедиться, что его 🪨 действител…

👍30🔥5❤3🤔2

10 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC≈3,970 views34 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

“Вот говорят, что подагра от почек. Я на почки никогда не жаловался: на УЗИ всё в порядке, анализы в норме. Получается, что почки ни при чём, и надо искать другую причину?” Периодически вижу рассуждения подобного плана. Давайте попробуем разобраться, в чём тут дело 🧐 Базово есть 3 типа гиперурикемии: ▪️ Перепроизводство МК; ▪️ Недовыведение МК; ▪️ Смешанный тип. Чистое перепроизводство встречается редко (<10%)…

👍17❤12🤔3🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ihavegout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ihavegout edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Вы довольны врачами, которые консультировали вас по подагре?

  1. Да, они (он) произвели хорошее впечатление16%
  2. Да, но хорошего пришлось поискать. Попадались и так себе17%
  3. Нет, был(а) у нескольких: хоть один бы что дельное сказал34%
  4. Нет. Был(а) у одного - не понравилось. К другим не обращался(лась)18%
  5. Не был(а) у врачей15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 08:52 UTCAnonymous Poll700 voters

У вас были приступы подагры, когда мочевая кислота была в норме уже ДОЛГОЕ ВРЕМЯ?

  1. Были полноценные приступы14%
  2. Были лёгкие симптомы / "намёки на приступ"19%
  3. Что-то болело - уверенно сказать не могу11%
  4. Нет, всё нормально13%
  5. Посмотреть, как отвечали42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“У меня подагра 😱” (@ihavegout), 8,711 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihavegout.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.