Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐢 𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 [АРХИВ]

Channel

𝐢 𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 [АРХИВ]

@ihatetypology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,221subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002329464892
TypeChannel
Username@ihatetypology
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ihatetypology

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2212,2442,232.57 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,244 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,243 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,237 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,236 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,233 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,235 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,229 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,231 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,228 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,221 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 38 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,218–2,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:202,221-7
11 Sept 2026, 05:552,228-3
6 Sept 2026, 02:372,231+2
1 Sept 2026, 21:142,229-6
29 Aug 2026, 18:252,235+2
26 Aug 2026, 08:262,233-3
23 Aug 2026, 16:042,236-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:372,237-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:382,242-1
14 Aug 2026, 01:282,243+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:142,242-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:322,244+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:022,242no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:552,242first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

947 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35837.8%
💯10511.1%
🍓10010.6%
❤‍🔥798.34%
💘717.50%
🥰626.55%
🔥555.81%
💋495.17%
🎉181.90%
🏆121.27%
😘101.06%
🙏80.845%
👍70.739%
50.528%
🤝40.422%
🐳20.211%
🍾10.106%
👏10.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 947 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ihatetypology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2025 to 3 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2025, 18:45 UTC≈6,530 views98 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💯4722💋16🥰6🍓3👍2💘2

Signed агасфер

3 Oct 2025, 18:45 UTC≈5,240 views144 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Перевод книги по Эннеатипу 8 уже доступен к чтению! 🦋 Перед вами перевод книги, который я сделал почти сразу, как книга появилась в общем доступе в сети. На сём я спешу сообщить, что моя деятельность в сообществе подходит к концу. Я был рад стараться ради вас и я рад, что вы читали меня, были моей аудиторией. Вы самые лучшие! ❤

82💯24💘19😘10🍓5❤‍🔥2👍2

Signed агасфер

7 Sept 2025, 13:03 UTC≈7,040 views110 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нужно ли соответствовать архетипу?🤩 🤩 О корреляции как инструменте типирования Раз уж я выпустил несколько постов о корреляциях подряд, думаю, стоит прояснить и свой взгляд на вопрос корреляций, архетипов и мое личное отношение к ним как к методу типирования. В этой статье я продемонстрирую, почему система корреляций не выполняет поставленные в своём основании задачи, обладает плохой применимостью, а так же, как бы

🍓5724❤‍🔥16🔥6🎉3💋3🥰1

Signed агасфер

29 Aug 2025, 15:07 UTC≈5,120 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎀 Хотелось бы к различиям добавить ещё и то, что в MBTI и типологии Юнга функциональный стек, по сути, различный. В системе MBTI используется модель с чередованием установок EIEI для экстравертов и IEIE для интровертов, где вспомогательная функция всегда имеет противоположную направленность доминантной. Юнгианская же модель, напротив, утверждает иную структуру: EEII для экстравертов и IIEE для интровертов. Это означа

39🍓9💯7💘2👏1🥰1

Signed Пр вврп

29 Aug 2025, 13:30 UTC≈3,940 views97 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🌟 Почему между MBTI, Юнгом и Соционикой нет прямой корреляции Или почему перенос типа в этих трех системах 1:1 чреват ошибками 🎀 Очень часто люди в тпкм переносят 1:1 свой соционический тип, тип в MBTI и Юнгианский тип, например, типировавшись по MBTI в ESTP переносят в другие типологии как СЛЭ и ES(T). Кто то может написать, что эти три системы имеют общий источник, соответственно такой перенос возможен и окажется

60💯16🏆12💘4🍓3🍾1🥰1

Signed Пр вврп

26 Aug 2025, 13:06 UTC≈5,560 views42 reactions36 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🥰20💯98❤‍🔥4💋1

Signed агасфер

26 Aug 2025, 13:06 UTC≈2,670 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 В файле представлено изложение основных концепций книги Латышева о Психософии для быстрого введения в тему и удобного извлечения информации. Можете разослать файл друзьям, которые хотят быстро понять, что из себя представляет эта типология! 💗

💘2714🥰7🙏5❤‍🔥3

Signed агасфер

20 Aug 2025, 15:03 UTC≈3,210 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🏮 ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ БЛОКОВ В МОДЕЛИ А [4/4] (На базе материалов А. Аугустинавичюте) 🖤 ИД БЛОК 🌼 🦋 (Ограничительная + Фоновая) 🦋 🌟 ОБЩИЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ Психосоматический демонстративный блок, отвечающий за самореализацию организма среди других организмов. Это блок стремлений, желаний, устремлений и физической самореализации. Он послушно служит принятым социальным ценностям и характеризуется импульсивностью. Использует

15🥰10🔥6🎉3👍3💘3🤝2

Signed агасфер 8.0%

20 Aug 2025, 13:01 UTC≈2,670 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🏮 ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ БЛОКОВ В МОДЕЛИ А [3/4] (На базе материалов А. Аугустинавичюте) 🖤 СУПЕРИД БЛОК 🎀 🦋 (Суггестивная + Активационная) 🦋 🌟 ОБЩИЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ Физическая, психосоматическая основа личности. Это эгоцентричный блок, отражающий внутреннее состояние организма и являющийся источником бессознательных тревог и страхов. Он характеризуется выраженной склонностью к самопожертвованию и потребностью во внешней ре

15🎉12🔥8🥰3

Signed агасфер 8.0%

20 Aug 2025, 11:03 UTC≈1,800 views49 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

🏮 ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ БЛОКОВ В МОДЕЛИ А [2/4] (На базе материалов А. Аугустинавичюте) 🖤 СУПЕРЭГО БЛОК 🌺 🦋 (Ролевая + Болевая) 🦋 🌟 ОБЩИЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ Социально-конформный блок, через который индивид адаптируется к обществу и старается оправдать его ожидания. Является средством объективного познания мира и накопления информации. Это блок высокой самокритичности, социальной ответственности и долга, так называемая совест

27🥰95🙏3💘2💯2🐳1

Signed агасфер 8.0%

20 Aug 2025, 09:03 UTC≈1,880 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🏮 ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ БЛОКОВ В МОДЕЛИ А [1/4] (На базе материалов А. Аугустинавичюте) В течение дня собираюсь выпустить характеристики блоков и функций в Соционике, базируясь на трудах Аугустинавичюте. Каждые два часа планирую публиковать по одной статье. Первая на очереди статья о блоке Эго. Приятного прочтения! 🖤 ЭГО БЛОК 🌺 🦋 (Базовая + Творческая) 🦋 🌟 ОБЩИЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИ Блок социально демонстративен, полностью не

🍓2013💘11🔥5❤‍🔥1🐳1🥰1

Signed агасфер 8.0%

18 Aug 2025, 13:01 UTC≈2,100 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌺 Вторая статья из цикла о сочетаниях на этот раз про E9 и Экстравертный Ощущающий тип! 🎀 Почему-то в большинстве корр листов сложилось представление о архетипности связки Е9 с Интровертным Ощущающим типом (IS), что отрицается как самим Наранхо, так и более детальным анализом связки. По видимому путаница произошла из-за переноса 1:1 соционической базовой БС на Юнгианскую IS (что, конечно, некорректно). UPD: Персона

32🔥13💋8🥰3❤‍🔥2🤝2

Signed агасфер 8.0%

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ihatetypology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐢 𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 [АРХИВ]” (@ihatetypology), 2,221 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihatetypology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.