Channel
@igorantique
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
587subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001898172873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @igorantique |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/igorantique |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:44 | 587 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 588 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 590 | -1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 591 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 590 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 588 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 588 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 37.4% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 15.4% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про состояние сохранности эмали на царских знаках. Ещё давно, осуждая с товарищем требования, к состоянию сохранности знаков Российской Империи для хороших коллекций, он мне привёл вот такой интереснейший аргумент. На многих знаках, запечатлённых на фото, видны СИЛЬНЕЙШИЕ утраты эмалей. Интересно это тем, что по обыкновению, все повреждения, мы в основном, по умолчанию, списываем на 100+ летнее хранение непойми где, …
❤9🔥1
Когда говорят про то, почему знания важны коллекционера, говорят, в первую очередь, про то, чтобы избежать приобретения подделки. Однако, случается и обратное, когда заведомо подлинный предмет не попадает в коллекцию в силу неверной атрибуции или, совершенно излишних, сомнений. Именно про такую ситуацию расскажу вам я сегодня. Один мой клиент, в силу недостатка знаний, поставил под сомнение подлинность медали, на осн…
🔥3👍2❤1
Приятные были монетки! 16-17 века
❤6👍3
Фото сегодняшнего прибавления чуть получше. Часы за отличную стрельбу Павел Буре в золочении
👍5❤4
Вот такой вот сегодня Добрый День 😁
👍6🔥6❤1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍12❤2🕊1🤓1
Давно ничего вам не показывал. Покажу вам великолепно красивый Талер конца 16 века, Талер Саксен-Веймар (Старый Веймар) 1 талер 1595 года совместное правление Фридрих Вильгельм I и Иоганн III
❤9👍6🔥1🤓1
Из воспоминаний Брусилова: "Моим начальником штаба был генерал Ломновский. Это был человек умный, знающий, энергичный и в высшей степени трудолюбивый. Не знаю, почему он составил себе репутацию панического генерала. Подобная характеристика совершенно неверна. Он быстро соображал, точно выполнял мои приказания и своевременно их передавал в войска, был дисциплинирован и никогда не выказывал трусости и нерешительности.…
❤8🔥3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @igorantique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игорь Антиквар ️️🔍” (@igorantique), 587 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igorantique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.