Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Игнатьева

Channel

Ольга Игнатьева

@ignatewa_olga

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

610subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979757171
TypeChannel
Username@ignatewa_olga
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ignatewa_olga

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5656376017 August 2026 — 570 subscribers8 August 2026 — 570 subscribers14 August 2026 — 565 subscribers3 September 2026 — 637 subscribers12 September 2026 — 633 subscribers30 September 2026 — 618 subscribers12 October 2026 — 610 subscribers6107 August 202612 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 66 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 554–648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 07:37610-8
30 Sept 2026, 17:37618-15
12 Sept 2026, 19:38633-4
3 Sept 2026, 21:15637+72
14 Aug 2026, 20:34565-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:32570no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:16570first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8046.0%
🔥7241.4%
👍169.20%
🙏52.87%
😁10.575%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ignatewa_olga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 19 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2026, 20:01 UTC467 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как ты считаешь, работа с психологом реально влияет на то, сколько человек зарабатывает? 33% отметили, что пока голову не починишь, деньги не придут. 48% проголосовали за баланс. Кто же прав? Все)) Действительно, для того чтобы деньги пошли, нужна одна простая вещь — твоя голова. Если в голове порядок — деньги находятся. Если в голове хаос — деньги не задерживаются или проходят мимо. А теперь вопрос: возможно ли…

❤7🔥6🙏3

17 Feb 2026, 12:17 UTC314 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как ты считаешь, работа с психологом, она реально влияет на то, сколько человек зарабатывает?

  1. 1. Только это и влияет. Пока голову не починишь, деньги не пойдут.32%
  2. 2. Лучше работать с маркетологом. Рынку плевать на твои тараканы, нужна система продаж.19%
  3. 3. 50/50. Должен быть баланс. Одно без другого не работает эффективно.48%
  4. 4. Ни то, ни другое, важно просто много работать0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Feb 2026, 14:35 UTC304 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когда мой 63-летний клиент заработал 7000 €, я была в шоке. 😁 Игорь – массажист, системный расстановщик. Таких клиентов у меня ещё не было. Просто поставил перед фактом, что заходит ко мне в работу и по-другому быть не может)) И сделал таки мне предложение, от которого я не смогла отказаться )) Вроде доход неплохой 1700€. Клиенты были. Работал, жил, жена, но вот чувствовалось какое-то напряжение. Хотелось большего …

🔥17❤4

13 Feb 2026, 14:11 UTC212 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не взяла в сопровождение прекрасную женщину. И правильно сделала 😏 Вообще, я считаю, что личная работа не может быть рассчитана на всех. Потому что невозможно дать результат прям любому человеку. Кого я обычно беру в личную работу? Тех экспертов, которые зарабатывают в районе 100К и считают, что это совсем небольшие деньги. Им я помогаю выявить и убрать психологические блоки, тревожность, страх высоких чеков, вну…

🔥9❤2👍1

11 Feb 2026, 14:06 UTC189 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Иногда хватает месяца работы, чтобы иметь такие результаты, как у моих клиентов.😅 После прошлого поста у некоторых появились вопросики. Слишком уж быстро у людей меняется состояние, доход. Да, признаюсь. По наивности своей я тоже когда-то думала, что чтобы был результат, нужен минимум год плотной работы. Это будет похоже на исповедь, но я реально потратила уйму времени на создание своей методики. Которую оттачивал…

❤9🔥4🙏2

9 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC206 views22 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ты даже не представляешь, сколько людей говорили мне, что я творю какую-то хэрню. Особенно в отношении смены профессии и работы онлайн)) И знаешь, кем были советчики? Родственники, которые рекомендовали надеть очки и заглянуть в паспорт. Ведь мне уже глубоко за 40, куда я лезу со своими онлайн-штучками? Друзья, которые в онлайн-пространстве умеют только на маркетплейсах заказывать и угорать над котиками в рилсах.…

❤12🔥7👍3

10 Jan 2026, 16:11 UTC358 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каникулы по красоте Ничего умного сегодня от меня не услышите. Правда, похвастаться очень хочется. Я ж не только оливье в бедра отправляла 😁 Год открыла с Символа желания. Провела роскошный эфир - практикум, групповая динамика Агонь. Коллеги такие теплые отзывы прислали, что я до сих пор хожу с Гагаринской улыбкой от счастья. Если что, они здесь лежат. А вы где сейчас? Какая у вас погода? Начну с себя: Сочи, гор…

🔥9

1 Jan 2026, 11:00 UTC413 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Есть кто живой? 😁

❤6😁1

31 Dec 2025, 06:03 UTC357 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спешу к тебе, чтобы поздравить с самым любимым праздником 🎄 Как же я обожаю Новый год. За огоньки на ёлке, за снег (да-да, в Сочи он пошёл 29 декабря, правда 30 растаял ), за фейерверки и за счастливые лица людей. В 2026 год вхожу ровно с 666 подписчиками, ваххх! Спасибо тебе за поддержку, за каждый лайк, за обратную связь, за то, что ты здесь. Мне без вас никуда, правда. Каждый из вас для меня — близкий человек, …

❤10🔥6👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ignatewa_olga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Feb 2026, 12:17 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Как ты считаешь, работа с психологом, она реально влияет на то, сколько человек зарабатывает?

  1. 1. Только это и влияет. Пока голову не починишь, деньги не пойдут.32%
  2. 2. Лучше работать с маркетологом. Рынку плевать на твои тараканы, нужна система продаж.19%
  3. 3. 50/50. Должен быть баланс. Одно без другого не работает эффективно.48%
  4. 4. Ни то, ни другое, важно просто много работать0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 19 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Игнатьева” (@ignatewa_olga), 610 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ignatewa_olga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.